Skip to content

· Private foundation

Howard & Carolee White Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$204k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$314kAnimals$209kFood & Nutrition$207kPhilanthropy$176kHealth$101kEducation$68kPublic Benefit$60kReligion$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $199k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA$45,000
MENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$40,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$39,000
PETS IN NEED$15,000
MUTTVILLE$15,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SILICON VALLEY$15,000
PENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY$15,000
SWORDS TO PLOUGHSHARES$15,000
LUCILLE PACKARD HOSPITAL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 25% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY: $15k → 7%LUCILE PACKARD HOSPITAL: $24k → 8%SWORDS TO PLOUGHSHARES: $15k → 10%LIVE IN PEACE: $25k → 14%PETS IN NEED: $15k → 7%SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES: $10k → 10%PETS IN NEED: $13k → 7%SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES: $10k → 10%PETS IN NEED: $12k → 7%SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES: $10k → 10%PETS IN NEED: $10k → 7%SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES: $10k → 10%PETS IN NEED: $10k → 7%SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES: $10k → 10%PETS IN NEED: $10k → 7%SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES: $10k → 10%PETS IN NEED: $10k → 7%SCHWAB FUND FOR CHARITABLE GIVING: $26k → 10%PETS IN NEED: $10k → 7%SCHWAB FUND FOR CHARITABLE GIVING: $26k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA: $45k → 7%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SILICON VALLEY: $15k → 8%SCHWAB FUND FOR CHARITABLE GIVING: $26k → 10%MENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $40k → 7%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $39k → 8%SCHWAB FUND FOR CHARITABLE GIVING: $26k → 10%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA: $34k → 7%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $25k → 8%SCHWAB FUND FOR CHARITABLE GIVING: $26k → 10%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA: $34k → 7%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $25k → 8%SCHWAB FUND FOR CHARITABLE GIVING: $26k → 10%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA: $34k → 7%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $25k → 8%SCHWAB FUND FOR CHARITABLE GIVING: $20k → 10%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA: $30k → 7%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $24k → 8%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA: $30k → 7%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $20k → 8%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA: $30k → 7%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $20k → 8%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA: $30k → 7%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $15k → 8%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA: $22k → 7%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $14k → 8%RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $17k → 7%STANFORD HOSPITALS AND CLINICS: $19k → 8%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 11 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +133% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$1.1M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+133%
+34%

Still filing today

45%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsYouth DevelopmentHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $289k · revenue +133%
  • PI
    Pets In Need
    8× · 2018–2025 · $90k · revenue +181%
  • M
    MUTTVILLE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $90k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • LI
    LIVE IN PEACEgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +34%
  • SU
    STANFORD UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT SER
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
5
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Northern Nv

Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…

Unclassified
7
Spark Rescue Santa Barbara

It is Spark Rescue's mission to rescue, rehabilitate, medically treat, spay and neuter unwanted dogs and cats and place them into permanent homes. To prevent future un wanted litters we spay the mother of the litter being surrendered. We…

Animals
8
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
9
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
10
Peninsula Humane Society & Spca

The peninsula humane society & spca, guided by the humane ethic, builds healthy relationships between people and animals.

Animals
11
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
Lovebugs Rescue

Lovebugs rescue is a foster-based animal rescue located in southern california. we began our mission in october 2010 and focus on rescuing dogs from high kill shelters and neglect. we rescue all breeds and all ages. we provide all medical…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Live in Peace; the most unlike its peers is Kingdom First Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $206,500 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKSCHWAB FUND FOR CHARITABLE GIVING: $176,000 · OtherSCHWAB FUND FOR CHARITABLE GIVINGSWORDS TO PLOWSHARES: $60,000 · OtherSWORDS TO PLOWSHARESLUCILE PACKARD HOSPITAL: $59,000 · OtherLUCILE PACKARD HOSPITALMENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherMENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH+6 more: $70,500 · Other+6 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $289,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PEN…LIVE IN PEACE: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentLIVE IN PEACEPets In Need: $89,500 · AnimalsPets In NeedMUTTVILLE: $89,500 · AnimalsMUTTVILLEHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $15,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY SIL…RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $17,500 · EducationSTANFORD HEALTH CARE: $37,000 · Health
Other$612,000Youth Development$314,000Animals$194,000Education$52,500Health$37,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $289,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPets In Need: $89,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMUTTVILLE: $89,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSTANFORD HEALTH CARE: $37,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLIVE IN PEACE: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKINGDOM FIRST MINISTRIES: $12,000 over 2y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds Pets In Need ↗
  • Who funds MUTTVILLE ↗
  • Who funds STANFORD HEALTH CARE ↗
  • Who funds RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIVE IN PEACE ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM FIRST MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY15.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Howard & Carolee White Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Howard & Carolee White Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Howard & Carolee White Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Howard & Carolee White Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Howard & Carolee White’s filings →

    More from the funding graph