Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Howard and Barbara Farkas Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$349k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$349k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$2.2MFood & Nutrition$206kInternational$132kYouth Development$95kEducation$66kPublic Safety & Disaster$43kHousing & Shelter$25kArts & Culture$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$349,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Total paid to recipients listed below$349,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Queens Community House: $8k → 13%Queens Community House: $8k → 13%Hour Children: $5k → 17%Hour Children: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 24 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
3

Total granted

$2.8M
$19k

Still filing today

46%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthInternationalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +98%
  • NY
    NEW YORK EDGE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +71%
  • QC
    QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k
  • SP
    STS PETER & PAUL PRESERVATION CORP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Home Care Association of New York State Inc

To promote and enhance the quality and accessibility of health care and support at home.

Community Improvement
2
Hebrew Health Care Inc

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…

Health
3
Alliance Human Services Inc

The company shall promote and provide safe, healthy, quality services and living environments for children who cannot care for themselves.

Human Services
4
Abilitypath Housing

Abilitypath housing advances affordable, accessible housing projects that promote independence and inclusive communities for adults with developmental disabilities. through partnerships and innovative program designs, abilitypath housing…

Human Services
5
Leadingage New York Inc

Leadingage new york represents not-for-profit, mission-driven and public continuing care providers, including nursing homes, senior housing, adult care facilities, continuing care retirement communities, assisted living and community…

Civil Rights
6
The Way Back Inc

To provide rehabilitative housing services and support to help people with psychiatric disabilities reintegrate into the community.the agency provides rehabilitative housing services and staff support as a primary mechanism for achieving…

Human Services
7
Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc

To provide accountable, responsive quality care with the highest degree of sensitivity to the needs of our diverse, multilingual population while fulfilling the professional and educational needs of our members.

Health
8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
10
Advance Care Alliance of Ny Inc

Advance care alliance of new york, inc. (acany) is dedicated to providing the support and services for you or your loved one with an intellectual or developmental disability need to lead an active, healthy, and fulfilling life. acany was…

Human Services
11
Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities Inc

The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…

12
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alzheimer's Foundation of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Aphasia Association I. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Total paid to recipients listed below — $2,165,750 · OtherTotal paid to recipients listed belowNA — $341,600 · OtherNA+17 more — $210,000 · Other+17 moreNEW YORK EDGE INC — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE — $15,000 · Human ServicesHOUR CHILDREN INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $20,000 · InternationalALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $10,000 · HealthCHILDREN OF BELLEVUE INC — $5,000 · HealthGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,717,350Recreation & Sports$25,000Human Services$25,000International$20,000Health$15,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK EDGE INC — $15,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE — $15,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES — $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOUR CHILDREN INC — $10,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT HOSPITALITY INC — $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $10,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN OF BELLEVUE INC — $5,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL APHASIA ASSOCIATION I — $2,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK EDGE INC
  • Who funds QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE
  • Who funds CATHOLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES
  • Who funds HOUR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PROJECT HOSPITALITY INC
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF BELLEVUE INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL APHASIA ASSOCIATION I

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY15.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Howard and Barbara Farkas Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Howard and Barbara Farkas Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Howard and Barbara Farkas Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph