Skip to content
Hope Overflowing in Atlanta Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Hope Overflowing in Atlanta Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Religion$6kHealth$2kCommunity Improvement$2kHousing & Shelter$1kInternational$500Youth Development$400Philanthropy$250Food & Nutrition$181Other$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAILY LIVING MINISTRIES INC$1,200
MARKETPLACE LEADERS$800
NORTH POINT PRODUCTIONS INC$800
HUNTINGTONS DISEASE SOCIETY OF AMER$569
RISE AGAINST HUNGER$500
CHRIST LED COMMUNITIES$500
WISDOM HUNTERS RESOURCES$300
ATLANTA MISSION SUPPORT CORP$300
SEEDBED INC$181
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SERVANTEE INC: $100 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Hope Overflowing in Atlanta Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Hope Overflowing in Atlanta Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6k · 5 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$6k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+73%

Still filing today

40%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
ReligionHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    NORTH POINT PRODUCTIONS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • HD
    HUNTINGTONS DISEASE SOCIETY OF AMER
    4× · 2020–2023 · $2k
  • ML
    MARKETPLACE LEADERS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1k

Funded once

  • BC
    BUCKHEAD CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $400 · revenue +21%
  • GO
    GENERATIONS OUTREACH MINISTRIES IN
    one grant, 2022 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
3
National Christian Foundation -- Wisconsin Inc

Equipping followers of christ to give wisely to advance his kingdom by inspiring biblical stewardship and generosity.

Religion
4
Reaching International

Reaching the marketplace with the gospel of the kingdom of god through local/regional gatherings with business leaders, small business alliance groups and multigenerational mentoring programs for businesses.

Religion
5
Atlanta Pregnancy Resource Centers Inc

To share the truth and compassion of jesus christ, support life-affirming choices and promote healthy relationships by serving and caring for women and families in pregnancy-related circumstances

—
6
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
7
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
8
International Partnerships Inc

To provide support for the efforts of christians of the former soviet union in reaching the influencers of their countries for christ.

Religion
9
Align Life Ministries

To share the gospel of jesus christ and the sacredness of human life through pregnancy services, strategic partnerships, and equipping resources

—
10
New York Fellowship Inc

Interdenominational christian ministry reaching men, women, and youth with the gospel message of jesus christ; providing spiritual and material needs in the metropolitan ny area, national and international communities.

Religion
11
Faith Warrior Ministry

To reach gods elect with the gospel

Religion
12
Home of Grace for Christ's Workers

Christian worship & retreat center to equip christian workers and ministers to preach the gospel worldwide and to provide a retreat for short-term bible studies and prayers.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Mission Support Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Covenant House Georgia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUNTINGTONS DISEASE SOCIETY OF AMER: $1,528 · OtherHUNTINGTONS DISEASE SOCIETY OF AMERMARKETPLACE LEADERS: $1,400 · OtherMARKETPLACE LEADERSDAILY LIVING MINISTRIES INC: $1,200 · OtherDAILY LIVING MINISTRIES INCBUCKHEAD CHURCH: $1,000 · OtherBUCKHEAD CHURCHCHRIST LED COMMUNITIES INC FORMERLY CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP CONCEPTS: $500 · OtherCHRIST LED COMMUNITIES INC FORMERLY CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP CONCEPTSCOVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC: $400 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INCGENERATIONS OUTREACH MINISTRIES IN: $250 · Other+5 more: $809 · Other+5 moreNORTH POINT PRODUCTIONS INC: $1,700 · ReligionNORTH POINT PRODU…INTERFACE MINISTRIES INC: $100 · ReligionINTERFACE MINISTR…ATLANTA MISSION SUPPORT CORPORATION: $1,050 · Housing & ShelterATLANTA MI…WISDOM HUNTERS RESOURCES INC: $800 · Recreation & SportsRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $500 · InternationalNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $250 · PhilanthropySERVANTEE INC: $100 · Human Services
Other$7,087Religion$1,800Housing & Shelter$1,050Recreation & Sports$800International$500Philanthropy$250Human Services$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH POINT PRODUCTIONS INC: $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA MISSION SUPPORT CORPORATION: $1,050 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWISDOM HUNTERS RESOURCES INC: $800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHRIST LED COMMUNITIES INC FORMERLY CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP CONCEPTS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY AID CLINIC INC: $228 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFACE MINISTRIES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hope Overflowing in Atlanta Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hope Overflowing in Atlanta Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hope Overflowing in Atlanta’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home