Skip to content

· Public charity

Hope for Youth Foundation Inc

The Foundation was established for the purpose of promoting the health, opportunity, promise and education of our youth.It generates revenue through the sale of calendars, contributions and various fund raising events.The proceeds are then donated to various charities.

$249k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$157kHealth$141kEducation$108kPhilanthropy$104kFood & Nutrition$68kYouth Development$60kCrime & Legal$37kEnvironment$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $214,260, the rows itemized in this filing. The $248,910 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $34,650 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $177k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$981k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION$20,000
PEEKSKILL ROTARY FOUNDATION$18,860
CENTER FOR SAFETY & CHANGE$18,500
HILLSIDE FOOD OUTREACH$15,000
ARC OF WESTCHESTER$12,900
WILD EARTH$12,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$10,000
SPARC INC$10,000
ST DOMINICS FAMILY CENTER$10,000
NY PRESBYTERIAN HUDSON VALLEY$10,000
FRIENDS OF KAREN$10,000
CAREERS SUPPORT SOLUTIONS$10,000
OSSINING CHILDRENS CENTER$10,000
CROTON CARING COMMITTEE$10,000
BLUE PATH SERVICE DOGS$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CENTER FOR SAFETY & CHANGE: $19k → 9%OSSINING CHILDRENS CENTER: $10k → 9%SPARC INC: $10k → 9%CENTER FOR SAFETY & CHANGE: $10k → 9%OSSINING CHILDRENS CENTER: $10k → 9%CENTER FOR SAFETY AND CHANGE: $9k → 9%OSSINING CHILDRENS CENTER: $8k → 9%SPARC INC: $7k → 9%SPARC INC: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$759k · 20 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against -20% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
8

Total granted

$759k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-20%

Still filing today

65%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF KAREN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $72k · revenue +21%
  • WA
    WESTCHESTER ARC FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $47k · revenue +67%
  • YP
    YONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $45k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • AC
    ARC CHILDRENS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
  • PV
    PUTNAM VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westchester Exceptional Children Inc

Provide educational services to disabled children

—
2
Central New York Quest Inc

Central ny quest has been established to serve the needs of persons with intellectual, developmental and mental health disorders in the central new york region.

Human Services
3
White Plains Childrens Center Inc

A developmental day care center providing care for special needs and non-special needs children.

—
4
Children's Center of New Paltz Inc

Operate and maintain a day care center for children of students, faculty, and staff of the state university of new york at new paltz, and for children of the greater new paltz community.

Human Services
5
The County Chamber of Commerce

The business council of westchester's mission is to work hard to grow the economy, create jobs and build a strong business community in westchester county.

—
6
Family Service Society of Yonkers

The mission of family service society of yonkers is to be the premier provider of human services through a range of programs focusing on home health care, diverse family supports, education and advocacy. family service society of yonkers…

Human Services
7
New York Soccer Club of Westchester

Pursue the highest standard in youth development by providing the best possible environment for player growth, enjoyment and character development within a unified and cohesive club structure.

Recreation & Sports
8
Mount Kisco Child Care Center

To help working families thrive by providing equitable access to high-quality child care and early education to a diverse group of children through innovative, developmentally appropriate programming and a holistic approach to supporting…

Human Services
9
Family Ties of Westchester Inc

Through the power of peer-led support, education and advocacy, family ties builds resilience and ignites hope in families living in westchester county experiencing trauma, behavioral health needs and other systemic challenges.

Human Services
10
Westchester Jewish Community Services Inc

Westchester jewish community services (wjcs) is a non-sectarian, not for profit, broad based human service agency dedicated to helping people of all ages cope with emotional, cognitive, environmental, physical, social, and educational…

Health
11
Westchester Institute for Human Development

The westchester institute for human development (wihd) creates better futures for people with disabilities, for vulnerable children, and for their families and caregivers. wihd accomplishes its mission through professional education,…

Health
12
Alternatives for Children

To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Careers Support Solutions Inc; the most unlike its peers is Arts 10566 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEEKSKILL ROTARY FOUNDATION: $103,889 · OtherPEEKSKILL ROTARY FOUNDATIONMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $72,500 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONGILDAS CLUB-KIDS GROUP: $30,000 · OtherGILDAS CLUB-KIDS GROUPNY PRESBYTERIAN HUDSON VALLEY: $30,000 · OtherNY PRESBYTERIAN HUDSON VALLEYCROTON CARING COMMITTEE INC: $24,750 · OtherCROTON CARING COMMITTEE INCST DOMINICS FAMILY CENTER: $18,200 · OtherCAREERS SUPPORT SOLUTIONS INC: $18,000 · OtherCENTER FOR SAFETY: $16,500 · OtherST DOMINICS HOME: $14,000 · OtherBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC: $24,000 · OtherBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC+10 more: $66,510 · Other+10 moreFRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $72,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF KAREN…WESTCHESTER ARC FOUNDATION INC: $46,900 · HealthWESTCHESTER ARC …CENTER FOR SAFETY & CHANGE INC: $37,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR …OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $27,500 · Human ServicesOSSINING CH…SPARC INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesSPARC INCYONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC: $45,000 · EducationYONKERS PAR…SAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH: $36,000 · EducationSAN MIGUEL …HILLSIDE FOOD OUTREACH INC: $60,000 · Food & NutritionTEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC: $31,000 · Public BenefitWILD EARTH WILDERNESS SCHOOL: $29,500 · Youth Development
Other$418,349Health$118,900Human Services$87,000Education$81,000Food & Nutrition$60,000Public Benefit$31,000Youth Development$29,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $72,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHILLSIDE FOOD OUTREACH INC: $60,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetWESTCHESTER ARC FOUNDATION INC: $46,900 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER FOR SAFETY & CHANGE INC: $37,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH: $36,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC: $31,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWILD EARTH WILDERNESS SCHOOL: $29,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCROTON CARING COMMITTEE INC: $24,750 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC: $24,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSPARC INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCAREERS SUPPORT SOLUTIONS INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTS 10566 INC: $5,500 over 1y, 4.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KAREN INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSIDE FOOD OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTCHESTER ARC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR SAFETY & CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH ↗
  • Who funds TEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD EARTH WILDERNESS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CROTON CARING COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPARC INC ↗
  • Who funds CAREERS SUPPORT SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS 10566 INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pcsb Community FoundationNY19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pcsb Community Foundation · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Td Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Peckham Family Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hope for Youth Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hope for Youth Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hope for Youth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph