Skip to content
Hope for Poor Children Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Hope for Poor Children Foundation Inc

To provide destitute children and their families in third world countries with basic needs such as clean water, medical care, food, clothing, and education.

$698k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$3.7MHealth$261kEducation$112kYouth Development$95kPhilanthropy$44kArts & Culture$5kEnvironment$3k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $675,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $697,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $22,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $600k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL$200,000
CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD$200,000
AQUAYA INSTITUTE$100,000
WATER AID AMERICA$100,000
SACRED VALLEY HEALTH$25,000
HOSPITALITO ATITLAN$20,000
LIMITLESS HORIZONS$10,000
MISSION SANTA MARIA$10,000
ORKEESWA SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CHARITY NAVAGATOR: $500 → 7%ORKEESWA SCHOOL: $10k → 10%TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND: $5k → 8%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $25k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
WY
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 15 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
20

Total granted

$4.0M
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+26%

Still filing today

67%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthEducationScience & TechPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HK
    HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +44%
  • WA
    WATERAID AMERICA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $810k · revenue +63%
  • TA
    THE AQUAYA INSTITUTE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $343k · revenue +305%

Funded once

  • SH
    SACRED HEART SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • MS
    MARYKNOLL SISTERS
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • AF
    ASHOKA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
3
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
4
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
5
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
6
Amani Global Works

Amani Global Works ("Amani") was formed to develop and implement a comprehensive, inclusive and sustainable model for the provision of healthcare and related services to underserved rural communities in Africa. Amanis mission is to save…

Health
7
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
8
Muso Inc

Muso works to create a cure for delay because no one should die waiting for health care.

International
9
The Virtue Foundation

Virtue foundation's mission is to increase awareness, inspire action, and render assistance through initiatives on healthcare, education, and women and justice programs, as well as innovative work in research and analytics.

Public Benefit
10
HDIInc

HDI`s mission is to advance world public health and human dignity, especially the health and socioeconomic situation of under-served populations which more others are significantly constrained by preventable, degrading disease.

International
11
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
12
Project Orbis International Inc

Orbis builds strong and sustainable eye care systems globally that put treatment and prevention within reach

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $1,416,273 · InternationalHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONALCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $950,684 · InternationalCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INCWATERAID AMERICA INC: $810,000 · InternationalWATERAID AMERICA INC+4 more: $131,500 · InternationalSACRED VALLEY HEALTH: $170,000 · OtherSACRED VA…HOSPITALITO ATITLAN: $35,000 · OtherHOSPITALI…SACRED HEART SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherSACRED HE…ORKEESWA SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherORKEESWA …INDIGENOUS EDUCATION FDTN OF TANZANIA: $25,000 · OtherINDIGENOU…+14 more: $83,771 · Other+14 moreTHE AQUAYA INSTITUTE: $342,500 · Science & TechTHE AQUAY…MISSION SANTA MARIA: $75,000 · EducationTHE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY: $5,000 · EducationTHE MARANYUNDO INITIATIVE INC: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST: $43,466 · PhilanthropyAmigos Hospitalito Atitlan: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $40,000 · Human ServicesORKEESWA INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesThe Fistula Foundation: $25,000 · HealthCancer Care Inc: $2,500 · HealthEVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $2,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · Health
International$3,308,457Other$363,771Science & Tech$342,500Education$86,000Philanthropy$63,466Human Services$55,500Health$31,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $1,416,273 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $950,684 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWATERAID AMERICA INC: $810,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTHE AQUAYA INSTITUTE: $342,500 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetMISSION SANTA MARIA: $75,000 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST: $43,466 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSACRED VALLEY HEALTH: $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAmigos Hospitalito Atitlan: $20,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetLIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMIRACLES IN ACTION INC: $16,500 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetORKEESWA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MARANYUNDO INITIATIVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCancer Care Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNER COMPASS INITIATIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCharity Navigator: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERAID AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AQUAYA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MISSION SANTA MARIA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SACRED VALLEY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Amigos Hospitalito Atitlan ↗
  • Who funds LIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLES IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds ORKEESWA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARANYUNDO INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds EVERY MOTHER COUNTS ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds INNER COMPASS INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Charity Navigator ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hope for Poor Children Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hope for Poor Children Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 85%
  • The Maranyundo Initiative Inc: 85% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hope for Poor Children’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home