Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hope 2 Others Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$463k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.0MEducation$740kReligion$378kHuman Services$334kInternational$266kHousing & Shelter$250kScience & Tech$192kRecreation & Sports$183kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $284k
$18,631
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOSHEN VALLEY FOUNDATION$125,000
MID VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$84,000
AURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION$75,000
GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL$40,000
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$34,323
AMISTAD MCALLEN$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY$21,712
ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT$18,631
THE FRYDERYK CHOPIN SOCIETY OF TEXAS INC$7,500
UNIVERSITY OF BALAMAND$7,394
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$6,950
VALLEY NATURE CENTER$3,500
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-KINGSVILLE FOUNDATION$3,000
SU CASA DE ESPERANZA$3,000
MUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXAS HISTORY$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $909k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%GOSHEN VALLEY FOUNDATION: $125k → 6%AURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION: $148k → 27%AURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION: $135k → 27%AURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION: $114k → 27%AURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION: $113k → 27%AURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION: $108k → 27%AURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION: $75k → 27%AURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION: $75k → 27%AURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION: $5k → 27%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MO
MD
NC
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 19 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
20

Total granted

$2.9M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+27%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $164k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    AURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $774k · revenue +44% · 37% of their budget
  • GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $266k · revenue +32%
  • AM
    AMISTAD MCALLEN
    2× · 2020–2024 · $230k · revenue +8% · 51% of their budget

Funded once

  • FT
    FACE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1.2M · revenue -87% · 89% of their budget
  • TM
    THE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $47k · revenue ×285
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY
    one grant, 2021 · $39k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
2
Scott & White Memorial Hospital

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
9
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas

The primary mission or purpose of methodist health system is to serve people in defined service areas by meeting their health needs effectively and in a manner that reflects a "commitment to the christian concepts of life and learning" as…

Health
10
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
11
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
12
Newman University Inc

We are a catholic university named for saint john henry newman and founded by the adorers of the blood of christ for the purpose of empowering graduates to transform society. our core values (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Samaritan Center of San Antonio; the most unlike its peers is Su Casa De Esperanza Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HOME DEPOT FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherTHE HOME DEPOT FOUNDATIONGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $191,735 · OtherGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYStreet Soccer 2 U: $182,980 · OtherStreet Soccer 2 UIMMACULATE CONCEPTION SCHOOL: $172,814 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION SCHOOLMID VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $163,530 · OtherMID VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCOUR LADY OF REFUGE CHURCH: $88,500 · OtherOUR LADY OF REFUGE CHURCHAVIATION FLIGHT TRAINING LLC DBA WAYMAN AVIATION ACADEMY: $86,202 · OtherAVIATION FLIGHT TRAINING LLC DBA WAYMA…UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $85,683 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEYIndividual grant recipient: $74,361 · OtherWILEY MINISTRIES INC: $54,888 · Other+17 more: $181,302 · Other+17 moreFACE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION INC: $1,200,000 · HealthFACE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION INCTHE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $47,400 · Health+2 more: $10,500 · HealthAURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION: $773,712 · Human ServicesAURORA HOUSE FOUNDATIO…GOSHEN VALLEY FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesGOSHEN VALLEY FOUNDATI…+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesSu Casa De Esperanza Inc: $199,460 · EducationEmory University: $36,155 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $27,562 · EducationSouthern Methodist University: $25,000 · EducationThe New School: $19,731 · Education+1 more: $3,000 · EducationGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $266,000 · InternationalAMISTAD MCALLEN: $230,000 · ReligionFRYDERYK CHOPIN SOCIETY OF TEXAS INC: $39,500 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXAS HISTORY: $11,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MISSOURI VALLEY CONFERENCE: $250 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,531,995Health$1,257,900Human Services$908,712Education$310,908International$266,000Religion$230,000Arts & Culture$50,500Recreation & Sports$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFACE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION INC: $1,200,000 over 1y, 89% of budgetAURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION: $773,712 over 8y, 37% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $266,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetAMISTAD MCALLEN: $230,000 over 2y, 51% of budgetSu Casa De Esperanza Inc: $199,460 over 7y, 14% of budgetStreet Soccer 2 U: $182,980 over 4y, 100% of budgetMID VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $163,530 over 2y, 18% of budgetGOSHEN VALLEY FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRYDERYK CHOPIN SOCIETY OF TEXAS INC: $39,500 over 4y, 15% of budgetEmory University: $36,155 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $27,562 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe New School: $19,731 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXAS HISTORY: $11,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTeam Luke Hope for Minds: $9,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTexas A&M University - Kingsville Foundation Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MISSOURI VALLEY CONFERENCE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FACE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMISTAD MCALLEN ↗
  • Who funds Su Casa De Esperanza Inc ↗
  • Who funds Street Soccer 2 U ↗
  • Who funds MID VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds GOSHEN VALLEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILEY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRYDERYK CHOPIN SOCIETY OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds The New School ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXAS HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds Team Luke Hope for Minds ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M University - Kingsville Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raul Tijerina Jr FoundationTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raul Tijerina Jr Foundation · Valley Baptist Legacy Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hope 2 Others Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hope 2 Others Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hope 2 Others Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hope 2 Others Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hope 2 Others’ filings →

    More from the funding graph