· Private foundation
Hope 2 Others Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $145k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $284k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GOSHEN VALLEY FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| MID VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $84,000 |
| AURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL | $40,000 |
| GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $34,323 |
| AMISTAD MCALLEN | $30,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY | $21,712 |
| ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT | $18,631 |
| THE FRYDERYK CHOPIN SOCIETY OF TEXAS INC | $7,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF BALAMAND | $7,394 |
| NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY | $6,950 |
| VALLEY NATURE CENTER | $3,500 |
| SU CASA DE ESPERANZA | $3,000 |
| TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-KINGSVILLE FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| MUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXAS HISTORY | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $909k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $164k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHAURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $774k · revenue +44% · 37% of their budget
GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC4× · 2021–2024 · $266k · revenue +32%- AMAMISTAD MCALLEN2× · 2020–2024 · $230k · revenue +8% · 51% of their budget
Funded once
- FTFACE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $1.2M · revenue -87% · 89% of their budget
- TMTHE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $47k · revenue ×285
- UOUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEYone grant, 2021 · $39k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…
The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)
The primary mission or purpose of methodist health system is to serve people in defined service areas by meeting their health needs effectively and in a manner that reflects a "commitment to the christian concepts of life and learning" as…
Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.
To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).
We are a catholic university named for saint john henry newman and founded by the adorers of the blood of christ for the purpose of empowering graduates to transform society. our core values (see schedule o for continuation)
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Samaritan Center of San Antonio and the most unlike its peers is Su Casa De Esperanza Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FACE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AURORA HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds AMISTAD MCALLEN ↗
- Who funds Su Casa De Esperanza Inc ↗
- Who funds Street Soccer 2 U ↗
- Who funds MID VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds GOSHEN VALLEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WILEY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRYDERYK CHOPIN SOCIETY OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
- Who funds The New School ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXAS HISTORY ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds Team Luke Hope for Minds ↗
- Who funds Texas A&M University - Kingsville Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Raul Tijerina Jr Foundation · Valley Baptist Legacy Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hope 2 Others Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hope 2 Others Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hope 2 Others Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.