Skip to content
Hoosier Uplands Economic Development Corporation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Hoosier Uplands Economic Development Corporation

To plan, implement or cause to be implemented, and provided comprehensive services to the poor, elderly, and disabled.

$191k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$453kEducation$401kHealth$158kCrime & Legal$154kPublic Safety & Disaster$141kYouth Development$133kAnimals$110kHuman Services$72kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $162,712, the rows itemized in this filing. The $191,412 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $28,700 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $116k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$44M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF SALEM$19,700
TOWN OF ORLEANS$17,005
GIVING RECOVERY A CHANCE EVERYDAY INC GRACE HOUSE$12,500
CAST INC$12,500
EAST WASHINGTON SCHOOL CORP$12,000
TOWN OF PAOLI$11,100
ORANGE COUNTY RURAL VFD DISTRICT 1$11,000
YOUTH FIRST INC$10,000
WASHINGTON COUNTY YMCA$10,000
SOUTHERN IN VETERANS LIVING AND REHAB FACILITY$8,000
CRAWFORD COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$7,500
ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT$7,407
SHOALS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$6,500
LOOGOOTEE PICKLEBALL INC$6,000
WEST WASHINGTON SCHOOL CORP$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CHOICES LIFE RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 10%WASHINGTON CO YMCA: $20k → 13%WASHINGTON COUNTY YMCA: $10k → 13%WASHINGTON COUNTY YMCA: $10k → 13%WASHINGTON COUNTY YMCA: $10k → 13%WASHINGTON CO YMCA: $7k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 33 repeat orgs$326k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
25

Total granted

$1.5M
$309k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+29%

Still filing today

27%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YF
    YOUTH FIRST
    6× · 2019–2024 · $133k · revenue +83%
  • MB
    MUSIC BOOSTER CLUB OF BEDFORD NORTH LAWRENCE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $111k · revenue +138% · 86% of their budget
  • MC
    MARTIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $70k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • CC
    CRAWFORD COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $35k
  • SC
    STONE CITY ALLIANCE FOR RECOVERY & HOPE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +172%
  • PC
    PAOLI COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION THROOP ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Township Volunteer Fire Department of Starke County Indiana

Volunteer fire department

—
2
Washington Volunteer Fire Department

To provide fire and emergency services protection for washington township in grant county indiana.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Marion County Humane Society

The marion county humane society was established for the purpose of providing temporary care and housing of stray or homeless dogs and cats, to assist in the return of lost dogs and cats to their owners, to provide a means of finding new…

Animals
4
Indiana County Humane Society

To provide and to promote humane treatment toward animals

Animals
5
Centenary Community Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Provide fire protection for the rural area of marion county.

—
6
Fire Department of Washington Township Inc

Voluntary fire department the organization is voluntary fire dept located in washington township in knox county, indiana

—
7
Friends of Franklin County Indiana Animal Shelter

Friends of Franklin County Indiana Animal Shelter is dedicated to providing shelter, care, medical support, and adoption services for stray, surrendered, and homeless dogs and other animals in Franklin County, Indiana. The organization…

Animals
8
Harrison Township Volunteer Fire Co

To provide firefighting services to residents of harrison township in bartholomew county, indiana.

—
9
Washington Township Volunteer Fire Company

The organizations mission is to prevent the outbreak of fire and to save, rescue, and protect the lives and property of the citizens of washington township

—
10
Steuben County Humane Society Inc

Welfare and care of animals

Animals
11
Wayne County Humane Society
Animals
12
Starke County Humane Society Inc

Animal shelter

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orange County Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Huron Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIVING RECOVERY A CHANCE EVERYDAY INC GRACE HOUSE: $97,500 · OtherGIVING RECOVERY A CHANCE EVERYDAY INC GRACE HOUSECITY OF SALEM: $96,328 · OtherCITY OF SALEMTOWN OF ORLEANS: $69,329 · OtherGRANT LAW PC: $69,000 · OtherLAWRENCE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE: $54,640 · OtherTOWN OF PAOLI: $52,690 · OtherSHOALS COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION: $48,300 · OtherWASHINGTON CTY ECONOMIC GRWTH PSHIP: $45,250 · Other+43 more: $800,902 · Other+43 moreYOUTH FIRST: $133,000 · HealthYOUTH FIRS…GIVING RECOVERY A CHANCE EVERYDAY: $52,700 · HealthGIVING REC…MUSIC BOOSTER CLUB OF BEDFORD NORTH LAWRENCE: $111,000 · EducationMUSIC BOO…Creating Avenues for Student Transformation Inc: $55,000 · EducationCreating …MARTIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $69,500 · AnimalsORANGE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 · AnimalsORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $44,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $56,500 · Human ServicesCHOICES FOR WOMEN RESOURCE CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesPRISONER AND COMMUNITY TOGETHER PACT INC: $31,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,333,939Health$185,700Education$166,000Animals$89,500Philanthropy$69,500Human Services$66,500Crime & Legal$31,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH FIRST: $133,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMUSIC BOOSTER CLUB OF BEDFORD NORTH LAWRENCE: $111,000 over 5y, 86% of budgetMARTIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $69,500 over 6y, 14% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $56,500 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetCreating Avenues for Student Transformation Inc: $55,000 over 3y, 39% of budgetGIVING RECOVERY A CHANCE EVERYDAY: $52,700 over 2y, 30% of budgetWASHINGTON CTY ECONOMIC GRWTH PSHIP: $45,250 over 2y, 36% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $44,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetHURON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $34,779 over 3y, 75% of budgetPRISONER AND COMMUNITY TOGETHER PACT INC: $31,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSTONE CITY ALLIANCE FOR RECOVERY & HOPE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $20,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $20,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetORANGE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetORANGE COUNTY RURAL VFD DISTRICT 1: $11,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCHOICES FOR WOMEN RESOURCE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPAOLI VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $8,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCatholic Charities Bloomington Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMartin County Senior Citizens Housing Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUTH FIRST ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC BOOSTER CLUB OF BEDFORD NORTH LAWRENCE ↗
  • Who funds MARTIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Creating Avenues for Student Transformation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIVING RECOVERY A CHANCE EVERYDAY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON CTY ECONOMIC GRWTH PSHIP ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HURON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds PRISONER AND COMMUNITY TOGETHER PACT INC ↗
  • Who funds STONE CITY ALLIANCE FOR RECOVERY & HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Washington County Com…Regional Opportunity …The Smithville Charit…Lilly Endowment IncDuke Energy FoundationUniversity of Indiana…Johnson Family Founda…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation Partnership IncIN45× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Partnership Inc · Washington County Community Foundation Inc · Regional Opportunity Initiatives Inc · The Smithville Charitable Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · University of Indianapolis · Johnson Family Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hoosier Uplands Economic Development Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hoosier Uplands Economic Development Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hoosier Uplands Economic Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home