Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hoogerwerf Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$27kHuman Services$8kCommunity Improvement$6kHousing & Shelter$4kFood & Nutrition$3kEducation$3kEmployment$3kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$33k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Grand Haven Salvation Army$1,000
Tri Cities Love in Action$1,000
Genev Camp and Retreat Center$1,000
K-Love$600
Tri-Cities Habitat for Humanity$500
WCSG$300
Lightbridge Int'l$200
Individual grant recipient$200
The People Center$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%The People Center: $200 → 8%The People Center: $200 → 8%The People Center: $200 → 8%The People Center: $200 → 8%The People Center: $200 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$48k · 17 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
7

Total granted

$48k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
0%

Still filing today

35%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER
    4× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +230%
  • FC
    FRESH COAST ALLIANCE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +34%
  • TP
    THE PEOPLE CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • TL
    TriCities Love in Actio
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • KB
    KIDS BELONG
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • KH
    Kids Hope USA
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan

Expressing God's love by reaching out to the hurting and homeless of the Great Lakes Bay Region by providing shelter and care, proclaiming the Gospel of Christ, and establishing Christian disciples among disadvantaged people.

Housing & Shelter
2
Network of Hope Inc

To provide Christian, faith-based social assistance services which address the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of individuals and families in crisis.

Community Improvement
3
Wnc Lighthouse Inc

The mission of WNC Lighthouse Inc is Changing lives, by being a light for Christ our Lord. Our vision is To be fully devoted to Jesus Christ, by opening our arms and providing Christian services to the underseved children, adults and…

Human Services
4
Loaves & Fishes the Church Without Walls

Community outreach and church services

Religion
5
American Adoptions of California Dba Family Connection Christian Adoption

Family connections christian adoptions exists to assist the waiting children of the world into permanent, loving families. it is our belief that god's love is best expressed in the family. the work of fcca is a living expression of our…

Unclassified
6
Light of the Gospel Ministries

In association with Light of the Gospel Church, we propagate the gospel of Jesus Christ by all available means, both at home and in foreign lands. We provide evangelism and rehabilitation to orphaned and/or drug addicted children and…

Religion
7
Lighthouse Ministries Inc

Lighthouse ministries, inc. is set apart by the spirit of god to communicate the gospel of jesus christ to meet the physical, emotional, and other needs of the poor and at-risk population.

Religion
8
Ministry Center

We build bridges between people experiencing the immediate effects of poverty and homelessness to the physical and spiritual resources available to alleviate suffering and facilitate long term transformation.

Human Services
9
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
10
Lifechangers Outreach

We are a 12-month residential Christian ministry for men and women ages 18 and up who have drug and alcohol addictions or other life controlling issues. We seek to help men and women overcome those life controlling issues.

Health
11
Bridge of Hope Ministries

Transforming lives in the Ville through access to supportive services and efficacy.

Religion
12
Light International Inc

Evangelistic and mission programs

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids Belong; the most unlike its peers is First Priority of the Lakeshore. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WATERMARK CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherWATERMARK CHURCHDILLON COMMUNITY CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherDILLON COMMUNITY CHURCHTriCities Love in Action: $4,500 · OtherTriCities Love in ActionSalvation Army Grand Haven: $3,000 · OtherSalvation Army Grand HavenFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $3,000 · OtherFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGANK-Love: $2,800 · OtherK-LoveTri-Cities Habitat for Humanity: $2,750 · OtherTri-Cities Habitat for HumanityTriCities Love in Actio: $2,000 · OtherWCSG: $1,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · Other+8 more: $3,820 · Other+8 moreGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $7,000 · ReligionGENEVA CAMP & RE…LIGHTBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL LIGHTBRIDGE INTERNAT: $1,000 · ReligionLIGHTBRIDGE INTE…+1 more: $100 · ReligionFRESH COAST ALLIANCE: $2,500 · Community ImprovementKIDS BELONG: $2,000 · Civil RightsTHE PEOPLE CENTER INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesKids Hope USA: $1,000 · EducationLA ROCA MINISTRIES INC: $850 · Housing & Shelter
Other$40,070Religion$8,100Community Improvement$2,500Civil Rights$2,000Human Services$1,000Education$1,000Housing & Shelter$850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH COAST ALLIANCE: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS BELONG: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CENTER INC: $1,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHTBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL LIGHTBRIDGE INTERNAT: $1,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKids Hope USA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds FRESH COAST ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds KIDS BELONG ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL LIGHTBRIDGE INTERNAT ↗
  • Who funds Kids Hope USA ↗
  • Who funds LA ROCA MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds First Priority of the Lakeshore ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Haven Area Community Foundation IncMI15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hoogerwerf Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hoogerwerf Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hoogerwerf’s filings →

    More from the funding graph