Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Honorhealth

HONORHEALTH's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

$15M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$12M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$71MCommunity Improvement$6.4MRecreation & Sports$126kEnvironment$110kReligion$110kInternational$47kEmployment$30kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $168k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $405k
  • $250k+3 grants · $14M
$27,750
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.8B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION$12,000,000
DESERT MISSION INC$1,559,900
NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH ACC TO HEALTH$600,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$155,000
Mcdowell Sonoran Conservancy$100,000
Society of St Vincent De Paul Phoenix$100,000
COALITION TO STRENGTHEN HEALTHCARE$50,000
SCOTTSDALE CHARROS$40,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$27,750
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$25,000
Goodwill of Central & Northern AZ$15,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA$15,000
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$15,000
SCOTTSDALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$10,000
LIVING IN FULFILLED ENLIGHTENMENT LLC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CIRCLE THE CITY: $11k → 11%CIRCLE THE CITY: $10k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$77M · 16 repeat orgs$731k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$77M
$556k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+14%

Still filing today

94%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $62M · revenue +31% · 34% of their budget
  • NO
    NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH ACCESS TO HEALTH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.9M · revenue +282%
  • GP
    GREATER PHOENIX CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.3M · revenue +4% · 45% of their budget

Funded once

  • KA
    KEEPING ARIZONA HEALTHY
    one grant, 2020 · $386k
  • SH
    Scottsdale Healthcare Auxiliary
    one grant, 2017 · $62k
  • FS
    FIESTA SPORTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $31k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
3
American Council of Engineering Companies of Arizona

To assist member firms in achieving higher professional, ethical business and economic standards, enabling member firms to provide quality consulting and engineering services for their clients and the public.

—
4
The Dons of Arizona
Education
5
Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Foundation

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

Health
6
Arizona Association of Community Health Centers Inc

To promote and facilitate the development and delivery of affordable and accessible primary healthcare for everyone in arizona through advocacy, education and technical assistance.

Health
7
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
8
Arizona Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics

Azaap is committed to improving the health of arizona children and supporting the pediatric professionals who care for them.

Health
9
Arizona Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Inc

To promote higher business standards and advancement of common interest of its members, to improve business conditions in the metro phoenix area, to promote economic, social, and cultural development and the role of spanish speaking…

—
10
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
11
Banner Health Foundation

Established in 2001, banner health foundation secures and stewards charitable contributions to advance banner health's mission, investing in facilities and programs that support advancements in care, research, medical education, patient…

Health
12
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of the Valley and the most unlike its peers is Living in Fulfilled Enlightenment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyProfessional Trade Associat…Youth Sports ProgramsCommunity Organizations & A…Performing Arts Organizatio…Senior Affordable HousingArizona Policy Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number30%4%<5yr17%8%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr14%8%20–35yr10%25%35–55yr10%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value30%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr14%0%20–35yr10%81%35–55yr10%9%55yr+

The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
17%
2,923/17,022

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION — $62,140,693 · HealthHONORHEALTH FOUNDATIONNEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH ACCESS TO HEALTH — $7,852,130 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH ACCESS TO HEALTH+4 more — $595,750 · HealthGREATER PHOENIX CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $6,261,593 · OtherGREATER PH…KEEPING ARIZONA HEALTHY — $386,000 · OtherKEEPING AR…+14 more — $417,378 · Other+14 moreGREATER PHOENIX ECONOMIC COUNCIL — $80,000 · Community ImprovementThe Hatcher Urban Businesses — $20,000 · Community ImprovementPARADA DEL SOL — $20,000 · Community ImprovementMCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY — $110,000 · EnvironmentDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX — $100,000 · ReligionJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA — $47,126 · InternationalCIRCLE THE CITY — $20,650 · Human ServicesHospice of the Valley — $5,500 · Human Services
Health$70,588,573Other$7,064,971Community Improvement$120,000Environment$110,000Religion$100,000International$47,126Human Services$26,150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION — $62,140,693 over 8y, 34% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH ACCESS TO HEALTH — $7,852,130 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetGREATER PHOENIX CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $6,261,593 over 8y, 45% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $446,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKEEPING ARIZONA HEALTHY — $386,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetMCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY — $110,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCOTTSDALE CHARROS INC — $95,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $92,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PHOENIX ECONOMIC COUNCIL — $80,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetScottsdale Healthcare Auxiliary — $62,078 over 1y, 10% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCOTTSDALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $49,400 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA — $47,126 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFIESTA SPORTS FOUNDATION — $30,900 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGoodwill of Central and Northern Arizona — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE THE CITY — $20,650 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Hatcher Urban Businesses — $20,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetPARADA DEL SOL — $20,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetSCOTTSDALE ARTS — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPhoenix Police Reserve Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetLIVING IN FULFILLED ENLIGHTENMENT — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPHOENIX ART MUSEUM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCOTTSDALE FIREFIGHTER CHARITIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNO ON 208 — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Thunderbirds CharitiesVirginia G Piper Char…Banner HealthMercy CareThe Foundation for Co…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Arizona Community FoundationAZ19.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Banner Health · Mercy Care · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Honorhealth funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines