Skip to content

· Private foundation

Honora M Cullinan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$367k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$874kFood & Nutrition$430kCommunity Improvement$280kInternational$254kHuman Services$242kEducation$122kHousing & Shelter$113kPublic Safety & Disaster$40k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $172k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRANCISCAN OUTREACH ASSOCIATION$60,000
FRANCISCAN CONNECTION$60,000
GENERAL MINISTER OF THE FRANCISCAN ORDER$52,000
LOAVES AND FISHES$35,000
ST ANTHONY OF PADUA PARISH$35,000
THOMAS TERRY COMMUNITY CENTER$30,000
SISTER THEA BHOWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL$25,000
CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS$25,000
LITTLE FLOWER OF JESUS CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,000
PETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES$10,000
ST MARY'S HOME LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$10,000
MORNINGSTART MISSION MINISTRIES INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $164k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $25k → 22%MORNINGSTART MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 7%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $20k → 22%MORNINGSTART MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 7%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $20k → 22%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $20k → 22%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $20k → 22%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $19k → 22%CHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $15k → 22%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $15k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MO
MD
TN
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Honora M Cullinan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 41% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 28%.

Honora M Cullinan Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 16 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$2.2M
$198k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionInternationalEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    The Franciscan Connection
    7× · 2019–2025 · $299k · revenue +157% · 29% of their budget
  • CC
    CHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLAND
    8× · 2018–2025 · $154k · revenue +4%
  • LF
    LOAVES & FISHES INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $140k · revenue +53% · 46% of their budget

Funded once

  • GA
    GENERAL ADMIN OF THE FRANCISCAN ORD
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • FO
    FRANCISEAN OUTREACH ASSOCI
    one grant, 2018 · $40k
  • CS
    CUSTODY SAINT BENEDICT OF THE AMAZON
    2× · 2024–2025 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Comfort Care Homes

To provide temporary housing and care

Human Services
2
St Francis Care Center Inc

Educational, religious and living assistance services for senior citizens

Human Services
3
St Francis Center Inc

The center serves the under-served and persons with disabilities by partnering with donors, area churchs, foundations, and agencies to provide food, clothing, home repairs, assistance with utility and prescription apyments, and access to…

—
4
Pope Francis Center

Assisting poor and homeless with accessing public benefits job readiness counseling job referrals and housing referrals mail drop and Pope Francis Center Ids

Religion
5
Saint Francis Ministries
Religion
6
St Louis Center

Serving individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in an intentional, faith-based community.

—
7
Franciscan Center Inc

The franciscan center, inc., a ministry of the sisterts of st. francis assisi of milwaukee franciscan centers, is a multi-faceted emergency outreach agency serving the poor and homelesss of baltimore regardless of age, race, creed,…

Human Services
8
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Pgh

Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…

Human Services
9
St Francis-St Joseph Catholic Worker House

Provide food and shelter to 16 homeless men at no cost to them while they transition onto independent living. Provide free soup kitchen to all who choose to come to our door.

—
10
Saint Francis Catholic Outreach and Charitable

Provide assistance to local community

Religion
11
Catholic Social Services

To perform the works of mercy in response to the call of god. our corporal works of mercy performed primarily include providing food, clothing, shelter, and prison ministry. our spiritual works of mercy performed primarily include…

—
12
Carthage Crisis Center Inc

The carthage crisis center is committed to restoring homeless and needy people to self sufficiency with god's help.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peter & Paul Community Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Childrens Center of the Cumberland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRANCISCAN OUTREACH ASSOCIATION: $370,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN OUTREACH ASSOCIATIONGENERAL MINISTER OF THE FRANCISCAN ORDER: $254,000 · OtherGENERAL MINISTER OF THE FRANCISCAN ORDERST ANTHONY OF PADUA PARISH: $177,000 · OtherST ANTHONY OF PADUA PARISHLOAVES & FISHES INC: $140,000 · OtherLOAVES & FISHES INCFRANCISCAN MISSIONARY UNION: $100,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN MISSIONARY UNIONLITTLE FLOWER OF JESUS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $92,500 · OtherLITTLE FLOWER OF JESUS CATHOLIC CHURCHTHOMAS TERRY COMMUNITY CENTER: $70,000 · Other+11 more: $320,500 · Other+11 moreThe Franciscan Connection: $299,000 · ReligionThe Franciscan…FRANCISCANS FOR THE WORLD: $275,000 · InternationalFRANCISCANS F…CHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLAND: $154,000 · Human ServicesMORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $76,550 · EducationPETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $15,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,524,000Religion$299,000International$275,000Human Services$164,000Education$76,550Housing & Shelter$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Franciscan Connection: $299,000 over 7y, 29% of budgetFRANCISCANS FOR THE WORLD: $275,000 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetCHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLAND: $154,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES INC: $140,000 over 8y, 46% of budgetQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $76,550 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC URBAN PROGRAMS NFP: $40,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetPETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Franciscan Connection ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCANS FOR THE WORLD ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLAND ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC URBAN PROGRAMS NFP ↗
  • Who funds PETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Honora M Cullinan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Honora M Cullinan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Honora M Cullinan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Honora M Cullinan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Honora M Cullinan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph