Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Honora M Cullinan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$367k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Religion$874kFood & Nutrition$430kCommunity Improvement$280kInternational$254kHuman Services$242kEducation$122kHousing & Shelter$113kPublic Safety & Disaster$40k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $172k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRANCISCAN OUTREACH ASSOCIATION$60,000
FRANCISCAN CONNECTION$60,000
GENERAL MINISTER OF THE FRANCISCAN ORDER$52,000
ST ANTHONY OF PADUA PARISH$35,000
LOAVES AND FISHES$35,000
THOMAS TERRY COMMUNITY CENTER$30,000
SISTER THEA BHOWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL$25,000
CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS$25,000
LITTLE FLOWER OF JESUS CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,000
PETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES$10,000
ST MARY'S HOME LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$10,000
MORNINGSTART MISSION MINISTRIES INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $164k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $25k → 22%MORNINGSTART MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 7%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $20k → 22%MORNINGSTART MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 7%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $20k → 22%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $20k → 22%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $20k → 22%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $19k → 22%CHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $15k → 22%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $15k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MO
MD
TN
LA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Honora M Cullinan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 41% of the giving stays in IL; read by stated purpose it is 28% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Honora M Cullinan Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 16 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$2.2M
$198k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionInternationalEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    The Franciscan Connection
    7× · 2019–2025 · $299k · revenue +157% · 29% of their budget
  • CC
    CHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLAND
    8× · 2018–2025 · $154k · revenue +4%
  • LF
    LOAVES & FISHES INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $140k · revenue +53% · 46% of their budget

Funded once

  • GA
    GENERAL ADMIN OF THE FRANCISCAN ORD
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • FO
    FRANCISEAN OUTREACH ASSOCI
    one grant, 2018 · $40k
  • CS
    CUSTODY SAINT BENEDICT OF THE AMAZON
    2× · 2024–2025 · $28k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Comfort Care Homes

To provide temporary housing and care

Human Services
2
St Francis Care Center Inc

Educational, religious and living assistance services for senior citizens

Human Services
3
St Francis Center Inc

The center serves the under-served and persons with disabilities by partnering with donors, area churchs, foundations, and agencies to provide food, clothing, home repairs, assistance with utility and prescription apyments, and access to…

4
Pope Francis Center

Assisting poor and homeless with accessing public benefits job readiness counseling job referrals and housing referrals mail drop and Pope Francis Center Ids

Religion
5
Saint Francis Ministries
Religion
6
St Louis Center

Serving individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in an intentional, faith-based community.

7
Franciscan Center Inc

The franciscan center, inc., a ministry of the sisterts of st. francis assisi of milwaukee franciscan centers, is a multi-faceted emergency outreach agency serving the poor and homelesss of baltimore regardless of age, race, creed,…

Human Services
8
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Pgh

Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…

Human Services
9
St Francis-St Joseph Catholic Worker House

Provide food and shelter to 16 homeless men at no cost to them while they transition onto independent living. Provide free soup kitchen to all who choose to come to our door.

10
Saint Francis Catholic Outreach and Charitable

Provide assistance to local community

Religion
11
Catholic Social Services

To perform the works of mercy in response to the call of god. our corporal works of mercy performed primarily include providing food, clothing, shelter, and prison ministry. our spiritual works of mercy performed primarily include…

12
Carthage Crisis Center Inc

The carthage crisis center is committed to restoring homeless and needy people to self sufficiency with god's help.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peter & Paul Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Childrens Center of the Cumberland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRANCISCAN OUTREACH ASSOCIATION — $370,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN OUTREACH ASSOCIATIONGENERAL MINISTER OF THE FRANCISCAN ORDER — $254,000 · OtherGENERAL MINISTER OF THE FRANCISCAN ORDERST ANTHONY OF PADUA PARISH — $177,000 · OtherST ANTHONY OF PADUA PARISHLOAVES & FISHES INC — $140,000 · OtherLOAVES & FISHES INCFRANCISCAN MISSIONARY UNION — $100,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN MISSIONARY UNIONLITTLE FLOWER OF JESUS CATHOLIC CHURCH — $92,500 · OtherLITTLE FLOWER OF JESUS CATHOLIC CHURCHTHOMAS TERRY COMMUNITY CENTER — $70,000 · Other+11 more — $320,500 · Other+11 moreThe Franciscan Connection — $299,000 · ReligionThe Franciscan…FRANCISCANS FOR THE WORLD — $275,000 · InternationalFRANCISCANS F…CHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLAND — $154,000 · Human ServicesMORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION — $76,550 · EducationPETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $15,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,524,000Religion$299,000International$275,000Human Services$164,000Education$76,550Housing & Shelter$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Franciscan Connection — $299,000 over 7y, 29% of budgetFRANCISCANS FOR THE WORLD — $275,000 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetCHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLAND — $154,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES INC — $140,000 over 8y, 46% of budgetQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION — $76,550 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC URBAN PROGRAMS NFP — $40,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetPETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Franciscan Connection
  • Who funds FRANCISCANS FOR THE WORLD
  • Who funds CHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLAND
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES INC
  • Who funds QUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION
  • Who funds CATHOLIC URBAN PROGRAMS NFP
  • Who funds PETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds MORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Honora M Cullinan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Honora M Cullinan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Honora M Cullinan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph