Skip to content

· Private foundation

Honeybee Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$58kCivil Rights$35kEducation$30kHealth$28kReligion$24kEnvironment$22kFood & Nutrition$16kHuman Services$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,800
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST CONGREGATION$3,716
OASIS OF PEACE$3,600
NEW ISRAEL FUND$3,600
SAYTHE STUTTERING ASSOCIATION FOR THE YOUNG (OUR TIME THEATRE COMPANY)$3,600
THE HESPERIAN FOUNDATION$3,600
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS$2,700
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$2,500
WILLIAMS COLLEGE$2,500
SHALVA$1,800
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICES$1,800
AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION$1,800
HEARTLAND ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN NEEDS & HUMAN RIGHTS$1,800
FREE PRESS$1,800
TECHNOSERVE$1,800
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN WCK DC$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $2k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $2k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $900 → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $900 → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $540 → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $500 → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $371 → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $360 → 14%SHALVA: $3k → 14%SHALVA: $2k → 14%SHALVA: $2k → 14%SHALVA: $2k → 14%SHALVA: $720 → 14%SHALVA: $450 → 14%SHALVA: $450 → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $180 → 14%SHALVA: $450 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
CT
CA
MO
VA
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$228k · 57 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

57 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
17

Total granted

$228k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+10%

Still filing today

74%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $144 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalCivil RightsHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Williams College
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +33%
  • HH
    HESPERIAN HEALTH GUIDES
    7× · 2018–2025 · $11k · revenue +17%
  • SI
    SHALVA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $10k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVE SHALOMOASIS OF PEACE
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • NS
    NORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
4
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
5
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists Inc

International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.

International
6
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
7
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
8
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
9
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
10
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
11
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
12
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waterorg; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/56
Grantees still filing
38/56
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST CONGREGATION: $15,982 · OtherJEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST CONGREGATIONSAYTHE STUTTERING ASSOCIATION FOR THE YOUNG (OUR TIME THEATRE COMPANY): $13,050 · OtherSAYTHE STUTTERING ASSOCIATION FOR THE YOUNG (OU…Heartland Alliance for Human Needs and Rights: $7,020 · OtherHeartland Alliance for Human Needs and RightsOASIS OF PEACE: $5,400 · OtherANGELIC ORGANICS LEARNING CENTERCSA LEARNING CENTER: $4,750 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN WCK DC: $4,740 · OtherLEGAL MOMENTUM: $4,500 · OtherCHICAGO PUBLIC RADIO WBEZ: $4,320 · OtherCHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN: $4,050 · OtherThe Against Malaria Foundation: $6,660 · OtherThe Against Malaria Foundation+32 more: $39,258 · Other+32 moreHESPERIAN HEALTH GUIDES: $10,800 · InternationalHESPERIAN HEALTH GUIDESNEW ISRAEL FUND: $10,260 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $7,920 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SE…TECHNOSERVE INC: $7,470 · InternationalTECHNOSERVE INCHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $5,400 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INCGLOBAL EXCHANGE: $3,330 · InternationalGLOBAL EXCHANGE+10 more: $10,036 · International+10 moreWilliams College: $15,000 · EducationWilliams Col…The President and Trustees of Colby College: $7,500 · EducationThe Presiden…BRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationBRYN MAWR CO…WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $1,800 · EducationWILLIAM J BR…+1 more: $500 · EducationSHALVA INC: $10,470 · Human ServicesSHALVA INCInspiration Corporation: $7,171 · Human ServicesInspiratio…GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $5,190 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECT…+2 more: $900 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $17,400 · Civil RightsCENTER FO…CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $2,400 · Civil RightsCHILDREN'…PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $1,680 · Civil RightsPEOPLE FO…+3 more: $1,440 · Civil Rights+3 moreGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $9,770 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $1,440 · Food & NutritionFREE PRESS: $6,660 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $1,650 · Arts & CultureTHE ART CENTER OF HIGHLAND PARK: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$109,730International$55,216Education$28,800Human Services$23,731Civil Rights$22,920Food & Nutrition$11,210Arts & Culture$8,810

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $17,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHESPERIAN HEALTH GUIDES: $10,800 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSHALVA INC: $10,470 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $10,260 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $9,770 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $7,920 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTECHNOSERVE INC: $7,470 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetInspiration Corporation: $7,171 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHeartland Alliance for Human Needs and Rights: $7,020 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation: $6,660 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFREE PRESS: $6,660 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $5,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $5,190 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL MOMENTUM: $4,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN: $4,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL EXCHANGE: $3,330 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVE SHALOMWAHAT AL-SALAM INC: $3,240 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGREEN AMERICA: $3,060 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $2,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRESIST INC: $2,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $1,760 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $1,680 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $1,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACCION INTERNATIONAL: $1,620 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,530 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,460 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,440 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY: $1,440 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOCEANA ACTION INC: $1,440 over 4y, 36% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $1,440 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $1,340 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,320 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $1,280 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE IN POLITICS: $1,260 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWATERORG: $810 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMAN UTILITY: $720 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $540 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds HESPERIAN HEALTH GUIDES ↗
  • Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College ↗
  • Who funds TECHNOSERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Inspiration Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Heartland Alliance for Human Needs and Rights ↗
  • Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FREE PRESS ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL MOMENTUM ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds BRYN MAWR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL EXCHANGE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVE SHALOMWAHAT AL-SALAM INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
  • Who funds RESIST INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John D and Catherine T Macarthur FoundationIL16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Honeybee Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Honeybee Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Honeybee Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Honeybee Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Honeybee’s filings →

More from the funding graph