Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Homeless Action Network of Detroit

Our mission is to increase awareness of the problems of people who are homeless and the development and carrying out of strategies to create permanent solutions to homelessness in our community.

$5.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.7M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Housing & Shelter$293M
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $247k
  • $250k+6 grants · $5.7M
$438,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wayne Metro Community Action Agency$2,723,304
Michigan Coalition Against Homelessness$1,010,891
Community and Home Supports$713,883
United Community Housing Coalition$438,600
Ruth Ellis Center$393,943
Detroit Pheonix Center$373,825
Methodist Children's Home Society$246,712
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%Michigan Coalition Against Homelessness: $1.0M → 9%Detroit Pheonix Center: $374k → 21%COMMUNITY AND HOME SUPPORTS: $259k → 21%DETROIT PHOENIX CENTER: $124k → 21%COMMUNITY AND HOME SUPPORTS: $44k → 21%Community and Home Supports: $714k → 21%COMMUNITY & HOME SUPPORTS: $526k → 21%FEEDOM HOUSE: $446k → 21%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $547k → 21%Methodist Children's Home Society: $247k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$292M · 10 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$292M
$446k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Wayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $198M · revenue +86% · 53% of their budget
  • CH
    COMMUNITY & HOME SUPPORTS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +2%
  • UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
    2× · 2022–2023 · $779k · revenue +795%

Funded once

  • FH
    FREEDOM HOUSE DETROIT
    one grant, 2024 · $446k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
2
Washtenaw Housing Alliance

The mission of the washtenaw housing alliance is to end homelessness in our community.

Housing & Shelter
3
Housing Services of Mid Michigan

To assist people with low or moderate income to obtain safe and affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
4
Center for Family Health

The mission of the Center for Family Health is opening the door to health care for all.

Health
5
Habitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc

Our mission is to assist our affiliates to increase capacity to build simple decent homes in partnership with people in need in the State of Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
6
Methodist Children's Home Society Supporting Organization

To support Methodist Children's Home Society, which is a not for profit organization that provides shelter and services to emotionally impaired children.

Human Services
7
Michigan Advocacy Program

To advance the safety, independence, and economic stability of those most affected by poverty, racism, and other structurally oppressive systems by increasing access to justice and working for systemic solutions.

Crime & Legal
8
Fair Housing Center of W Michigan

The fair housing center of west michigan's mission is to ensure fair housing choice and equal access to housing opportunities for all. through education and advocacy, we affirm the right of all people to choose where they live, free from…

Housing & Shelter
9
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
10
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

11
Community Education Commission

CEC works with diverse stakeholders across Detroit to develop critical resources and system-level solutions that address common challenges faced by Detroit families in accessing quality education.

Education
12
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michigan Coalition Against Homelessness and the most unlike its peers is Ruth Ellis Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Wayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc — $197,597,224 · Community ImprovementWayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency IncUNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION — $85,457,624 · Housing & ShelterUNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITIO…+1 more — $185,123 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY & HOME SUPPORTS INC — $1,542,673 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS — $1,010,891 · Human ServicesMethodist Children's Home Society — $793,879 · Human ServicesDETROIT PHOENIX CENTER — $497,628 · Human ServicesFREEDOM HOUSE DETROIT — $446,403 · Human ServicesTHE HEAT AND WARMTH FUND — $3,158,434 · OtherSOUTHWEST COUNSELING SOLUTIONS — $1,397,383 · HealthUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $779,051 · Public Safety & DisasterRUTH ELLIS CENTER — $476,437 · Recreation & Sports
Community Improvement$197,597,224Housing & Shelter$85,642,747Human Services$4,291,474Other$3,158,434Health$1,397,383Public Safety & Disaster$779,051Recreation & Sports$476,437

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc — $197,597,224 over 5y, 53% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION — $85,457,624 over 5y, 85% of budgetTHE HEAT AND WARMTH FUND — $3,158,434 over 2y, 14% of budgetCOMMUNITY & HOME SUPPORTS INC — $1,542,673 over 4y, 11% of budgetSOUTHWEST COUNSELING SOLUTIONS — $1,397,383 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetMICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS — $1,010,891 over 1y, 35% of budgetMethodist Children's Home Society — $793,879 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $779,051 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetDETROIT PHOENIX CENTER — $497,628 over 2y, 19% of budgetRUTH ELLIS CENTER — $476,437 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE DETROIT — $446,403 over 1y, 13% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS — $185,123 over 2y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way for Southeastern MichiganMI23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · McGregor Fund · The Kresge Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · James and Cleo Hamilton Family Charitable Trust · Ally Charitable Foundation · The Skillman Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Homeless Action Network of Detroit funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Homeless Action Network of Detroit?

    Find your warmest path to Homeless Action Network of Detroit through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph