Skip to content

· Public charity

Homeaid Georgia Inc

HomeAids mission is to help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement, and education.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $51,561, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,160,954 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,109,393 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$5,022
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
BREAKTHRU HOUSE$19,709
MUST MINISTRIES$5,022
NORTH GEORGIA ANGEL HOUSE$1,509
PEACE PLACE SHELTER$200
GIGIS HOUSE$121
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NORTH GEORGIA ANGEL HOUSE: $2k → 6%PEACE PLACE SHELTER: $200 → 7%MUST MINISTRIES: $20k → 8%MUST MINISTRIES: $5k → 8%GIGIS HOUSE: $50k → 13%GIGIS HOUSE: $121 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
2
Home for Homeless Women
—
3
Gateway House Inc

Through crisis intervention, comprehensive support services and community collaboration, gateway domestic violence center helps create an environment for safe, healthy, self-sufficient growth, and violence prevention.

Human Services
4
Empowering Men and Women on the Move for Re-Entry Inc

Empowering Men and Women On the Move for Re-entry Inc, Supportive Housing Program for who are Homeless in Metro Atlanta. Mission Improve Quality of Life.

Crime & Legal
5
His House for Her Inc

We believe women deserve a chance to triumph over trauma and a place to become whole.

Housing & Shelter
6
Lifehouse Ministries Inc
Housing & Shelter
7
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

—
8
Shalom House Ministries Inc

Shalom House Ministries Inc operates a treatment center for women struggling with drug and alcohol addition. It also offers transitional dwelling for women who need a safe place after treatment.

Health
9
Julia Greeley Home Inc

Julia greeley home, inc. serves single unaccompanied women in the denver metro area between the ages of 18 and 64 who are struggling with chronic or repeated homelessness. the program fulfills existing gaps between overnight short term…

Housing & Shelter
10
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
11
CaringWorks Inc

Caringworks' mission is to reduce homelessness and empower the marginalized by providing access to housing and services that foster dignity, self-sufficieny & well-being.

Human Services
12
Mom Community Inc

To provide low-cost transitional living and life skill programs to pregnant mothers and new moms between the ages of 18 and 24

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Candid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/49
Grantees still filing
30/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VETERANS EMPOWERMENT ORGANIZATION OF GEORGIA: $101,327 · Public BenefitVETERANS EMPOWERMENT ORGANIZATION OF GEORGIAGigis House Inc: $50,121 · Human ServicesGigis House IncMust Ministries Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesMust Ministries Inc+2 more: $1,709 · Human ServicesHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,000 · InternationalHABITAT FOR …BREAKTHRU HOUSE INC: $19,709 · HealthBREAKTHRU…STATUS HOME INC F/K/A JERUSALEM HOUSE INC: $5,750 · Housing & Shelter
Public Benefit$101,327Human Services$76,830International$25,000Health$19,709Housing & Shelter$5,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVETERANS EMPOWERMENT ORGANIZATION OF GEORGIA: $101,327 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetGigis House Inc: $50,121 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMust Ministries Inc: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTATUS HOME INC F/K/A JERUSALEM HOUSE INC: $5,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEACE PLACE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Atlanta IncGA48.3× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc · Betty and Davis Fitzgerald Foundation Inc · The Scott Hudgens Family Foundation Inc · AEC Trust · Tw Marian W Ottley Atlanta Main

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Homeaid Georgia Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Homeaid Georgia Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Homeaid Georgia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph