Skip to content

· Private foundation

Holzheimer Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$227kArts & Culture$78kAnimals$38kHealth$27kPhilanthropy$15kReligion$5kPublic Benefit$4kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$156k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEWBERRY LIBRARY$7,500
SHEDD AQUARIUM$2,500
FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$2,500
ADLER PLANETARIUM$1,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND$1,000
WTTW$1,000
MENLO COLLEGE$1,000
PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC$1,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$1,000
PHILIP LEE PHILLIPS MAP SOCIETY OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS$1,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$800
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$500
ANIXTER CENTER$500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$500
HISTORIC NEW ORLEANS COLLECTION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PHILIP LEE PHILLIPS MAP SOCIETY OF: $3k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION - AGS LIBRARY RESEARCH FUND: $15k → 10%PHILIP LEE PHILLIPS MAP SOCIETY OF: $3k → 14%UNIV OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%SHEDD AQUARIUM: $5k → 14%PHILIP LEE PHILLIPS MAP SOCIETY OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS: $3k → 14%UNIV OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%SHEDD AQUARIUM: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%SHEDD AQUARIUM: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%SHEDD AQUARIUM: $5k → 14%UNIV OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION HISTORY OF CARTOGRAPHY: $10k → 10%FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $3k → 14%UNIV OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%SHEDD AQUARIUM: $3k → 14%UNIV OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%SHEDD AQUARIUM: $3k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION - HISTORY OF CARTOGRAPHY PROJECT: $10k → 10%FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $3k → 14%UNIV OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $3k → 14%ADLER PLANETARIUM: $3k → 14%UNIV OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $3k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HARLEY: $5k → 10%FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $3k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HARLEY FELLOWSHIP: $5k → 10%FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $3k → 14%FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $3k → 14%ADLER PLANETARIUM: $3k → 14%SHEDD AQUARIUM: $3k → 14%SHEDD AQUARIUM: $3k → 14%FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $3k → 14%ADLER PLANETARIUM: $3k → 14%ADLER PLANETARIUM: $3k → 14%ADLER PLANETARIUM: $3k → 14%SHEDD AQUARIUM: $3k → 14%FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $3k → 14%NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $28k → 14%NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $9k → 14%NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $8k → 14%NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $8k → 14%NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $8k → 14%NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $8k → 14%NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $8k → 14%NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $8k → 14%NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
CA
DE
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$340k · 26 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
18

Total granted

$340k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-6%

Still filing today

62%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyHousing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $96k · revenue +43%
  • SA
    SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +67%
  • TA
    THE ADLER PLANETARIUM
    8× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION - AGS LIBRARY RESEARCH FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION - HISTORY OF CARTOGRAPHY PROJECT
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIV OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION HISTORY OF CARTOGRAPHY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
7
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
10
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
11
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
12
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is The Clare Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $95,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $89,000 · EducationTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $8,000 · Education+3 more: $4,815 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION - AGS LIBRARY RESEARCH FUND: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FO…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION - HISTORY OF CARTOGRAPHY PROJECT: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FO…UNIV OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION HISTORY OF CARTOGRAPHY: $10,000 · OtherUNIV OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATI…MENLO COLLEGE: $8,000 · OtherMENLO COLLEGEPHILIP LEE PHILLIPS MAP SOCIETY OF: $6,000 · OtherPHILIP LEE PHILLIPS MAP SO…PHILIP LEE PHILLIPS MAP SOCIETY OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS: $5,500 · OtherPHILIP LEE PHILLIPS MAP SO…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HARLEY: $5,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HARLEY FELLOWSHIP: $5,000 · OtherHISTORIC NEW ORLEANS COLLECTION: $4,500 · OtherWTTW - CHANNEL 11: $4,000 · OtherAMERICAN TRUST FOR THE BRITISH: $4,000 · OtherNATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $4,000 · Other+14 more: $8,200 · Other+14 moreFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $22,500 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEU…THE ADLER PLANETARIUM: $15,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ADLER P…WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $32,500 · AnimalsSHEDD AQU…PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $8,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · HealthJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $9,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyLESTER AND ROSALIE ANIXTER CENTER: $4,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE CLARE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $500 · Housing & ShelterMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $900 · International
Education$197,315Other$94,200Arts & Culture$40,000Animals$32,500Health$13,500Philanthropy$13,000Housing & Shelter$5,000International$3,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $95,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $89,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $32,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADLER PLANETARIUM: $15,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMENLO COLLEGE: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLESTER AND ROSALIE ANIXTER CENTER: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLARE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Norman B Leventhal Map & Education Center Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $115 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetART ENCOUNTER: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds THE ADLER PLANETARIUM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MENLO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds LESTER AND ROSALIE ANIXTER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLARE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Norman B Leventhal Map & Education Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Holzheimer Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Holzheimer Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Holzheimer Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Holzheimer Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Holzheimer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph