Skip to content
Hollymar Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Hollymar Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0165% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$12kHealth$10kArts & Culture$9kRecreation & Sports$5kAnimals$1kCommunity Improvement$1kReligion$600Youth Development$575Other$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
2
States reached
$148k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Kings College$200
Individual grant recipient$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($51k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($7k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Uryadis Village: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
IL
WI
MA
PA
CT
KY
VA
DC

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($7k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$7k · 5 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$38k · 11 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
23

Total granted

$38k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+30%

Still filing today

55%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Sigma Chi Foundation
    3× · 2018–2023 · $12k · revenue +59%
  • MC
    MIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL
    2× · 2022–2023 · $700 · revenue +0%
  • MT
    MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $200 · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • LT
    LOUDOUN THERAPEUTIC RIDING FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue 0%
  • LH
    Loudoun Hunt Pony Clubgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue ×19
  • AP
    A PLACE TO BEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Loudoun Museum Inc

Discover, Conserve, Interpret and disseminate knowledge of Loudouns Culture and History.

Arts & Culture
2
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
3
Masters of Foxhounds Association of America

The Masters of Foxhounds Association (MFHA) is the governing body of organized, mounted hunting of acceptable quarry within North America and Canada. It promotes and protects the sport, recognizes organized hunts which meet its published…

Recreation & Sports
4
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
5
Virginia Harness Horse Association

The association promotes the harness racing industry in virginia by promoting harness racing in virginia, and by promoting the breeding of virginia-bred standardbreds.

Community Improvement
6
Longneck Manor Conservation Foundation

To create memorable guest experiences which promote actions to help save species, habitats, and the communities who share those same landscapes

Animals
7
London Town Foundation

To support the preservation, reconstruction and operation of london town and to provide education about colonial maryland

—
8
The National Sporting Library and Museum

The mission of the organization is to preserve, promote, and share the literature, art, and culture of equestrian, angling, and field sports.

Education
9
Hampshire Country School

Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…

—
10
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
11
Equine Land Conservation Resource

Access to and conservation of land for equine use

Environment
12
President and Fellows of Middlebury College

Through a commitment to immersive learning, we prepare students to lead engaged, consequential, and creative lives, contribute to their communities, and address the world's most challenging problems.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is King's College; the most unlike its peers is Colonial Beach Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $6,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientA PLACE TO BE: $1,026 · OtherLoudoun 4H Canterlopes: $750 · Other+20 more: $3,333 · Other+20 moreSigma Chi Foundation: $11,500 · EducationSigma Chi FoundationMIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $700 · EducationMIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CHA…+1 more: $200 · EducationOATLANDS INC: $8,500 · Arts & CultureOATLANDS INC+1 more: $120 · Arts & CultureLOUDOUN THERAPEUTIC RIDING FOUNDATION INC: $8,610 · HealthLOUDOUN THERAPEUT…Loudoun Hunt Pony Club: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsLoudoun Hun…LOUDOUN HUNT INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsLOUDOUN HUN…COLONIAL BEACH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Community ImprovementCOLONIAL BEACH RESCUE SQUAD INC: $275 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$20,109Education$12,400Arts & Culture$8,620Health$8,610Recreation & Sports$6,000Community Improvement$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$275

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSigma Chi Foundation: $11,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOUDOUN THERAPEUTIC RIDING FOUNDATION INC: $8,610 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOATLANDS INC: $8,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetA PLACE TO BE: $1,026 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOUDOUN HUNT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLONIAL BEACH RESCUE SQUAD INC: $275 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKING'S COLLEGE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $120 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLEBURG HUMANE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLEBURG HUNT ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Sigma Chi Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LOUDOUN THERAPEUTIC RIDING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OATLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Loudoun Hunt Pony Club ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE TO BE ↗
  • Who funds LOUDOUN HUNT INC ↗
  • Who funds COLONIAL BEACH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds COLONIAL BEACH RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds URYADIS VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KING'S COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLEBURG HUMANE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLEBURG HUNT ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giv…Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hollymar Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hollymar Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hollymar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home