· Private foundation
Hollie & Anna Oakley Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $7k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $143k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $363k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Art Spaces Inc | $163,000 |
| Swope Art Museum | $100,000 |
| Shepherds of Griffin Bike Park | $50,000 |
| Indiana State University Foundation | $50,000 |
| Optimist International Foundation | $25,000 |
| Wabash River Development & Beautification Inc | $25,000 |
| ReThink Inc | $25,000 |
| Terre Haute Symphony Orchestra | $15,000 |
| Team of Mercy Inc | $12,500 |
| Chances for Youth Inc | $10,000 |
| Streator Township High School | $10,000 |
| Terre Haute Childrens Museum | $10,000 |
| Boy Scouts of America | $10,000 |
| Providence Food Pantry | $5,000 |
| North Central JrSr High School | $1,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Indiana State University Foundation Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $275k · revenue +103%- ITIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +82%
- SMSAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGE3× · 2021–2023 · $250k · revenue +15%
Funded once
Purdue Research Foundation2× · 2021–2025 · $95k · revenue -4%- VCVigo Co Historical Societyone grant, 2022 · $50k
- HBHAPPINESS BAG PLAYERS INCone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advances the common good in the Wabash Valley by partnering with volunteers, companies and organizations to fund quality programs and initiatives in three core impact areas: Education, Health and Community Basics.
The mission of the Terre Haute Chamber of Commerce is to preserve, protect, and promote a business friendly envrionment free of obstacles to growth and development.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.
Education & Museum Operations
The Foundation supports the Indiana Philanthropy Alliance, Inc. and its member community foundations through special initiatives that support or expand philanthropy in Indiana.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.
Eskenazi Health Foundation inspires, energizes and promotes a vital, healthy Indianapolis community by providing strategic guidance and philanthropic resources to Eskenazi Health.
Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Hospital Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is 14th & Chestnut Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Indiana State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Sheldon Swope Art Museum Inc ↗
- Who funds WABASH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Rea Park Inc ↗
- Who funds Purdue Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds Wabash River Development & Beautification Inc ↗
- Who funds OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERDS OF GRIFFIN BIKE PARK INC ↗
- Who funds HAPPINESS BAG PLAYERS INC ↗
- Who funds TERRE HAUTE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds reTHink Inc ↗
- Who funds Wabash Valley Habitat for Humanity ↗
- Who funds 14th & Chestnut Community Center ↗
- Who funds TERRE HAUTE WOMEN'S CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Team of Mercy Inc ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Terre Haute Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gregory L Gibson Charitable Foundation Inc · Wabash Valley Community Foundation Inc · Clara Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Hulman & Company Foundation Inc · The George F and Marion D Johnson Charitable Trust · Indiana Chemical Trust Tr Ua-Fdt 320006018 · Frederick R Benson Trust · Max L Gibson & Jacqueline Gibson Foundation · The Weston Wabash Foundation · United Way of the Wabash Valley Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Hux Family Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hollie & Anna Oakley Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hollie & Anna Oakley Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Hollie & Anna Oakley Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.