Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hollie & Anna Oakley Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$507k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$163k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.2MArts & Culture$858kRecreation & Sports$168kCommunity Improvement$140kPublic Safety & Disaster$114kEnvironment$113kFood & Nutrition$105kPhilanthropy$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $363k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Art Spaces Inc$163,000
Swope Art Museum$100,000
Shepherds of Griffin Bike Park$50,000
Indiana State University Foundation$50,000
Optimist International Foundation$25,000
ReThink Inc$25,000
Wabash River Development & Beautification Inc$25,000
Terre Haute Symphony Orchestra$15,000
Team of Mercy Inc$12,500
Terre Haute Childrens Museum$10,000
Streator Township High School$10,000
Chances for Youth Inc$10,000
Boy Scouts of America$10,000
Providence Food Pantry$5,000
North Central JrSr High School$1,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%14th and Chestnut Community Center: $15k → 19%Happiness Bag Inc: $50k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 26 repeat orgs$508k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
18

Total granted

$2.5M
$434k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+1%

Still filing today

50%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Indiana State University Foundation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $275k · revenue +103%
  • SM
    SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $250k · revenue +15%
  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • Purdue Research Foundation
    2× · 2021–2025 · $95k · revenue -4%
  • HB
    HAPPINESS BAG PLAYERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • VC
    Vigo Co Historical Society
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of the Wabash Valley Inc

Advances the common good in the Wabash Valley by partnering with volunteers, companies and organizations to fund quality programs and initiatives in three core impact areas: Education, Health and Community Basics.

Philanthropy
2
Terre Haute Area Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of the Terre Haute Chamber of Commerce is to preserve, protect, and promote a business friendly envrionment free of obstacles to growth and development.

—
3
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
6
Vigo County Historical Society Inc

Education & Museum Operations

—
7
Indiana Philanthropy Alliance Foundation Inc

The Foundation supports the Indiana Philanthropy Alliance, Inc. and its member community foundations through special initiatives that support or expand philanthropy in Indiana.

—
8
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
10
Eskenazi Health Foundation Inc

Eskenazi Health Foundation inspires, energizes and promotes a vital, healthy Indianapolis community by providing strategic guidance and philanthropic resources to Eskenazi Health.

Health
11
Healthlinc Incorporated

Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.

—
12
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is 14th & Chestnut Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Art Spaces Inc: $398,000 · OtherArt Spaces IncUniversity of Central Florida: $125,000 · OtherUniversity of Central FloridaTerre Haute Police Department: $113,500 · OtherTerre Haute Police DepartmentThrive West Central: $100,000 · OtherThrive West CentralTerre Haute Symphony Orchestra: $90,000 · OtherTerre Haute Symphony OrchestraRose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $53,900 · OtherVigo Co Historical Society: $50,000 · OtherHAPPINESS BAG PLAYERS INC: $50,000 · Other+27 more: $489,650 · Other+27 moreIndiana State University Foundation Inc: $275,000 · EducationIndiana State University Founda…SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGE: $250,000 · EducationSAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGEIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · EducationIVY TECH FOUNDATION INCPurdue Research Foundation: $95,257 · EducationPurdue Research FoundationSheldon Swope Art Museum Inc: $250,000 · Arts & CultureSheldon Sw…TERRE HAUTE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureTERRE HAUT…WABASH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyOPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyFriends of Rea Park Inc: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsSHEPHERDS OF GRIFFIN BIKE PARK INC: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsWabash River Development & Beautification Inc: $75,000 · EnvironmentreTHink Inc: $37,500 · EnvironmentMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $80,000 · Food & NutritionHOOSIERS FEEDING THE HUNGRY INC: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,470,050Education$870,257Arts & Culture$290,000Philanthropy$175,000Recreation & Sports$150,000Environment$112,500Food & Nutrition$90,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIndiana State University Foundation Inc: $275,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGE: $250,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSheldon Swope Art Museum Inc: $250,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetWABASH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFriends of Rea Park Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetPurdue Research Foundation: $95,257 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $80,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWabash River Development & Beautification Inc: $75,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetOPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetRose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $53,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAPPINESS BAG PLAYERS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTERRE HAUTE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $40,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetreTHink Inc: $37,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetWabash Valley Habitat for Humanity: $20,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetTERRE HAUTE WOMEN'S CLUB INC: $15,000 over 1y, 67% of budget14th & Chestnut Community Center: $15,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCatholic Charities Terre Haute Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUNION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOOSIERS FEEDING THE HUNGRY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGREENE COUNTY HEALTH INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Indiana State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Sheldon Swope Art Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds WABASH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Rea Park Inc ↗
  • Who funds Purdue Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Wabash River Development & Beautification Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds HAPPINESS BAG PLAYERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERDS OF GRIFFIN BIKE PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds TERRE HAUTE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds reTHink Inc ↗
  • Who funds Wabash Valley Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds TERRE HAUTE WOMEN'S CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds 14th & Chestnut Community Center ↗
  • Who funds Team of Mercy Inc ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities Terre Haute Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gregory L Gibson Charitable Foundation IncIN26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gregory L Gibson Charitable Foundation Inc · Wabash Valley Community Foundation Inc · Clara Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Hulman & Company Foundation Inc · The George F and Marion D Johnson Charitable Trust · Indiana Chemical Trust Tr Ua-Fdt 320006018 · Frederick R Benson Trust · Max L Gibson & Jacqueline Gibson Foundation · The Weston Wabash Foundation · United Way of the Wabash Valley Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Hux Family Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hollie & Anna Oakley Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hollie & Anna Oakley Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hollie & Anna Oakley Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hollie & Anna Oakley Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hollie & Anna Oakley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph