Skip to content

· Private foundation

Holliday Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$201kEducation$63kCommunity Improvement$45kRecreation & Sports$34kHuman Services$19kYouth Development$19kPhilanthropy$18kCrime & Legal$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$4,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$180k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$30,000
SK8 CHURCH$8,649
KINGDOM SPORTS$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
CONVERGE WORLDWIDE$4,500
SELAH$2,500
SUMMIT CHRISTIAN COLLEGE$1,250
COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION$750
NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%SELAH: $3k → 6%OPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MI
NY
CA
CO
NE
MO
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$394k · 17 repeat orgs$126k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
24

Total granted

$394k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
0%

Still filing today

35%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHealthReligionHuman ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SUMMIT CHRISTIAN COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +51%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +54%
  • M
    MYBRIDGE
    6× · 2017–2023 · $17k · revenue +174%

Funded once

  • MT
    MENTORING TIMOTHY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $31k · revenue -22%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • AR
    ALIYAH RETURN CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

—
2
Grateful Shepherd Ministries

Training pastors and leaders in christian faith

Religion
3
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
4
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
5
WIRED4SPORT

wired4sport resources are uniquely designed by sportspeople for sportspeople to strengthen your love for God, to train in godliness and to put your faith into practice. Unlike other resources, these strategies will enable you to apply your…

Education
6
Mission Partners for Christ Aka Community Health Initiatives
Community Improvement
7
Ministerial Health Fellowship
Arts & Culture
8
Explore God Network
—
9
Hopewell Ministries

To provide Christian counseling.

Human Services
10
Christian Ministries International
—
11
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
12
Faith to Faith Ministry Faith to Fatih Ministry

Radio braodcast

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fellowship of Christian Athletes; the most unlike its peers is Christ for Life Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOREGON TRAIL FOUNDATION: $56,500 · OtherOREGON TRAIL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $37,740 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,140 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $12,840 · Other+27 more: $102,919 · Other+27 moreMENTORING TIMOTHY INC: $30,593 · ReligionMENTORING T…MYBRIDGE: $16,750 · ReligionMYBRIDGEINTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN EMBASSY JERUSALEM - USA INC: $6,940 · ReligionINTERNATION…FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP …Christ for Life Ministry: $18,649 · Youth DevelopmentChrist for …Called to Compete Inc: $12,500 · Youth DevelopmentCalled to C…SUMMIT CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $46,050 · EducationSUMMIT CH…FESTIVAL OF HOPE: $9,500 · HealthGOLDEN HALO FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthOPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER: $2,500 · Human ServicesSelah: $2,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $200 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$360,139Religion$54,283Youth Development$51,149Education$46,050Health$10,000Human Services$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUMMIT CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $46,050 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetMENTORING TIMOTHY INC: $30,593 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChrist for Life Ministry: $18,649 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetMYBRIDGE: $16,750 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCalled to Compete Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFESTIVAL OF HOPE: $9,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetOPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSelah: $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNEBRASKA GREATS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUMMIT CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MENTORING TIMOTHY INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds Christ for Life Ministry ↗
  • Who funds MYBRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds Called to Compete Inc ↗
  • Who funds FESTIVAL OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN EMBASSY JERUSALEM - USA INC ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Selah ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA GREATS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Holliday Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Holliday Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Holliday Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Holliday Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Holliday Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph