Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hofheimer Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$204k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$204k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$278kHealth$234kHuman Services$198kReligion$192kFood & Nutrition$185kHousing & Shelter$102kPublic Safety & Disaster$89kArts & Culture$78kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$204,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEE STMT C$204,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 49 repeat orgs$258k to everyone else

49 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 49 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
13

Total granted

$1.4M
$54k

Still filing today

14%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalHousing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    Heartland Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +81%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +23%
  • MW
    MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCACY - VOICES OF COURAGE
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • CS
    COMMUNITY SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
3
Community Foundation of Central Mo

The community foundation of central missouri inspires and nurtures philanthropy for the public good.

Philanthropy
4
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
5
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
6
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
7
Missouri Jobs With Justice

Educate the community on workers' rights

Employment
8
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
9
Community Health Centers of Southeastern Iowa Inc

To provide primary health care to residents of the greater se iowa region, especially those individuals/families with limited resources or with other barriers to health care. see schedule o for additional information.

Health
10
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
11
Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center Inc

We, saint joseph regional medical center (sjrmc) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.sjrmc is a member of trinity health.

Health
12
Central Iowa Hospital Corporation

Improving the health of the community through healing, caring and teaching.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Child Advocacy Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEE STMT C: $204,000 · OtherSEE STMT CUNITED WAY: $200,000 · OtherUNITED WAYSECOND HARVEST: $80,000 · OtherTEMPLE ADATH JOSEPH: $80,000 · OtherNOYES HOME: $80,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR FOOD KITCHEN: $80,000 · OtherINTERSERVE: $60,000 · Other+51 more: $760,500 · Other+51 moreSAINT JOSEPH YOUTH ALLIANCE INC: $24,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $11,000 · Crime & LegalHeartland Foundation: $30,000 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY MISSIONS CORPORATION: $10,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSOURIINC: $4,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,544,500Crime & Legal$35,000Health$30,000Human Services$30,000Housing & Shelter$10,500Philanthropy$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHeartland Foundation: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH YOUTH ALLIANCE INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY MISSIONS CORPORATION: $10,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSOURIINC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBARTLETT CENTER: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Heartland Foundation ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOSEPH YOUTH ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MISSIONS CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Commerce Bancshares FoundationMO17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Heartland Regional Medical Center · Wm and Margaret Schreiber Char Tr · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hofheimer Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hofheimer Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hofheimer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph