Skip to content

· Public charity

Hockey Helps Inc

To assist individuals struggling with addiction, mental illness, and cancer, and to provide support for children and youth facing economic disadvantages, illness, or related hardships.

$621k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$997kRecreation & Sports$739kEducation$325kYouth Development$298kHuman Services$289kPhilanthropy$160kInternational$50kPublic Benefit$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $593,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $620,863 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $27,863 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $149k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $444k
$30,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH SHORE HOLIDAY HOUSE$80,000
SOULFUL LIVING ADDICTION$80,000
FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE$75,000
FRIENNDS OF NORTHPORT$55,000
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUIC$54,000
SMILEZONE FOUNDATION USA$50,000
STEPHANE MATTEAU FOUNDATION$50,000
THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN$30,000
LONG ISLAND SLED HOCKEY$25,000
HENRIK LUNDQVIST FOUNDATION$20,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$20,000
GARDEN OF DREAMS FOUNDATION$20,000
NEW ENGLAND AMATEUR SKATING F$14,000
COMPANIONS IN COURAGE FDTN$10,000
JUNIOR WELFARE LEAGUE OF HUNT$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $204k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN: $30k → 10%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $75k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $33k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $33k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $33k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
RI
KY
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 15 repeat orgs$282k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$2.6M
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+27%

Still filing today

93%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NORTH SHORE HOLIDAY HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $520k · revenue +100% · 25% of their budget
  • FO
    FRIENNDS OF NORTHPORT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $305k · revenue +71% · 97% of their budget
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $174k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • FK
    FLYING KITES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +39%
  • TS
    THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • AH
    AUGUST HECKEL INDEPENDENT TR
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospital for Sick Children Foundation

Our Mission is to inspire our communities to invest in health and scientific advances to improve the health of children and their families in Canada and around the world.

Human Services
2
Northwell Health Inc

Northwell health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to promote clinical care, health education, conduct biomedical research, and caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Community Improvement
3
Ross K Macneill Foundation

End pediatric brain cancer by raising money for research and raising awareness for the diagnosis. our research investments focus on innovative non-toxic therapy development for children.

—
4
Northwell Healthcare Inc

Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…

Health
5
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
6
North Shore Health System Medical Faculty Group Practice

North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…

Health
7
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…

Human Services
8
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
9
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Washongton Dc Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

Health
10
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
11
South Shore University Hospital

South shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
12
Lenox Hill Hospital Medical Pc

Lenox hill hospital medical, pc is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Stephane Matteau Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
11/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOULFUL LIVING FOR ADDICTION AND LONG TERM RECOVERY INC: $540,000 · HealthSOULFUL LIVING FOR ADDICTION…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $80,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $54,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUIC…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $40,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW…+1 more: $15,000 · HealthNORTH SHORE HOLIDAY HOUSE INC: $520,000 · Recreation & SportsNORTH SHORE HOLIDAY HOUS…LONG ISLAND SLED HOCKEY INC: $105,000 · Recreation & SportsLONG ISLAND SLED HOCKEY …FRIENNDS OF NORTHPORT INC: $305,000 · EducationFRIENNDS OF …Nova Southeastern University Inc: $20,000 · EducationNova Southea…STEPHANE MATTEAU FOUNDATION INC: $242,976 · Crime & LegalSTEPHANE …SMILEZONE FOUNDATION USA: $235,000 · Youth DevelopmentSMILEZONE…HENRIK LUNDQVIST FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · PhilanthropyHENRIK LU…COMPANIONS IN COURAGE FOUNDATION: $60,000 · PhilanthropyCOMPANION…GARDEN OF DREAMS FOUNDATION: $55,000 · PhilanthropyGARDEN OF…PINK AID INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyPINK AID …THE CARLEIGH MAC FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyFAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $174,000 · Human ServicesTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesNEW ENGLAND AMATEUR SKATING FOUNDATION INC: $84,000 · OtherNEW ENGLAND…ICE HOCKEY IN HARLEM INC: $30,000 · OtherICE HOCKEY …THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN: $25,000 · OtherTHE SHELTER…AUGUST HECKEL INDEPENDENT TR: $20,000 · OtherAUGUST HECK…OHIOHEALTH CORPORATION: $13,000 · OtherIntermountain Deaconess Childrens Services: $10,000 · OtherFLYING KITES INC: $50,000 · OtherFLYING KITE…THE JUNIOR WELFARE LEAGUE OF HUNTINGTON: $50,000 · OtherTHE JUNIOR …WORKWELL INDUSTRIES INC: $15,000 · Other
Health$729,000Recreation & Sports$625,000Education$325,000Crime & Legal$242,976Youth Development$235,000Philanthropy$235,000Human Services$204,000Other$297,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOULFUL LIVING FOR ADDICTION AND LONG TERM RECOVERY INC: $540,000 over 6y, 98% of budgetNORTH SHORE HOLIDAY HOUSE INC: $520,000 over 6y, 25% of budgetFRIENNDS OF NORTHPORT INC: $305,000 over 6y, 97% of budgetSTEPHANE MATTEAU FOUNDATION INC: $242,976 over 5y, 65% of budgetSMILEZONE FOUNDATION USA: $235,000 over 5y, 100% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $174,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLONG ISLAND SLED HOCKEY INC: $105,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetHENRIK LUNDQVIST FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AMATEUR SKATING FOUNDATION INC: $84,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPANIONS IN COURAGE FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetGARDEN OF DREAMS FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $54,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLYING KITES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE JUNIOR WELFARE LEAGUE OF HUNTINGTON: $50,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetICE HOCKEY IN HARLEM INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetPINK AID INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC GROUP RETURN: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORKWELL INDUSTRIES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIntermountain Deaconess Childrens Services: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARLEIGH MAC FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hockey Helps Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hockey Helps Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hockey Helps’ filings →

More from the funding graph