· Public charity
Hockey Helps Inc
To assist individuals struggling with addiction, mental illness, and cancer, and to provide support for children and youth facing economic disadvantages, illness, or related hardships.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $593,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $620,863 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $27,863 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k8 grants · $149k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $444k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOULFUL LIVING ADDICTION | $80,000 |
| NORTH SHORE HOLIDAY HOUSE | $80,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE | $75,000 |
| FRIENNDS OF NORTHPORT | $55,000 |
| AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUIC | $54,000 |
| STEPHANE MATTEAU FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| SMILEZONE FOUNDATION USA | $50,000 |
| THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN | $30,000 |
| LONG ISLAND SLED HOCKEY | $25,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $20,000 |
| GARDEN OF DREAMS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| HENRIK LUNDQVIST FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| NEW ENGLAND AMATEUR SKATING F | $14,000 |
| JUNIOR WELFARE LEAGUE OF HUNT | $10,000 |
| COMPANIONS IN COURAGE FDTN | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $204k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NSNORTH SHORE HOLIDAY HOUSE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $520k · revenue +100% · 25% of their budget
- FOFRIENNDS OF NORTHPORT INC6× · 2020–2025 · $305k · revenue +71% · 97% of their budget
- FSFAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC4× · 2022–2025 · $174k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- FKFLYING KITES INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +39%
- TSTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMENone grant, 2023 · $25k
- AHAUGUST HECKEL INDEPENDENT TRone grant, 2023 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our Mission is to inspire our communities to invest in health and scientific advances to improve the health of children and their families in Canada and around the world.
Northwell health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to promote clinical care, health education, conduct biomedical research, and caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.
Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…
End pediatric brain cancer by raising money for research and raising awareness for the diagnosis. our research investments focus on innovative non-toxic therapy development for children.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…
Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…
North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…
Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…
South shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stephane Matteau Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOULFUL LIVING FOR ADDICTION AND LONG TERM RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH SHORE HOLIDAY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENNDS OF NORTHPORT INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHANE MATTEAU FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SMILEZONE FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds LONG ISLAND SLED HOCKEY INC ↗
- Who funds HENRIK LUNDQVIST FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND AMATEUR SKATING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds COMPANIONS IN COURAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GARDEN OF DREAMS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds FLYING KITES INC ↗
- Who funds THE JUNIOR WELFARE LEAGUE OF HUNTINGTON ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds ICE HOCKEY IN HARLEM INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc ↗
- Who funds PINK AID INC ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC GROUP RETURN ↗
- Who funds WORKWELL INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Intermountain Deaconess Childrens Services ↗
- Who funds THE CARLEIGH MAC FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hockey Helps Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Nova Southeastern University Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.