Skip to content
Hlmh Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Hlmh Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$272k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$2.7MEducation$2.1MRecreation & Sports$1.0MInternational$650kYouth Development$450kCivil Rights$369kArts & Culture$360kHealth$330kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $268k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $272k
$10,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT - BNEI AKIVA OF THE UNITED STATES AND$271,585
CAMPS RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC$215,317
NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC$206,739
YESHIVA UNIVERSITY$120,000
FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC$112,400
YESHIVAT HE'ATID$111,111
PARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIES$93,920
JEP CONGREGATIONS OF LONG ISLAND$91,300
THE RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT - BNEI AKIVA OF THE UNITED STATES AND$85,003
EDEN VILLAGE CAMP INC$50,000
HILLEL SCHOOL OF TAMPA INC$50,000
PARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIES$17,852
RAMAH DAROM$10,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO$10,000
CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 81% of grant dollars ($6.9M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 19% that went abroad ($1.6M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $742k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JCC OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $10k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC: $250k → 20%NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES: $22k → 7%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC: $250k → 20%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO: $100k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO: $100k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MD
NC
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 19% of all-years giving ($1.6M)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$1.6M · 8 grants
Canada$30k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 20 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
15

Total granted

$4.4M
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+52%

Still filing today

70%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $859k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NR
    NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $438k · revenue +6%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    2× · 2020–2022 · $369k · revenue +68%
  • RAMAH IN THE ROCKIES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $270k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • HL
    HAMERCAZ LECHINUCH YEHUDI TZIONI (OFAKIM)
    one grant, 2023 · $600k
  • TI
    THE ISRAEL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY CENTERS LTD
    one grant, 2020 · $550k
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING I
    one grant, 2023 · $400k · revenue -56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gan Israel Chabad Inc

Operation of summer day camp and overnight camp which combines activities with a Torah education

Recreation & Sports
2
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
5
Jewish Reconstructionist Camping Corporation

Incredibly diverse and welcoming communities where we encourage children to discover what being jewish means to themno matter who they are or where they come from.

Recreation & Sports
6
Young Judaea Global Inc

Young judaea is a diverse community that educates and empowers jewish youth to deeply engage with israel and to lead positive change for the jewish people, israel and the world.

Education
7
Yeshivath Gesher

Yeshivath Gesher is a local Jewish School whose primary purposes are to strengthen the religious, moral and intellectual welfare of its members, their families and the community. The Yeshiva also promotes the principles of the Orthodox…

Religion
8
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
9
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
10
Hadar Hatorah Rabbinical College and Subsidary Machon Chana

Religious education

Education
11
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
12
Sherit Isroel
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shalom Institute Camp & Conference Center; the most unlike its peers is Names Not Numbers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
25/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION OF ORTHODOX JEWISH CONGREGATIONS OF AMERICA: $770,000 · OtherUNION OF ORTHODOX JEWISH CONGREGATIONS OF AMERICAHAMERCAZ LECHINUCH YEHUDI TZIONI (OFAKIM): $600,000 · OtherHAMERCAZ LECHINUCH YEHUDI TZIONI (OFAKIM)THE ISRAEL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY CENTERS LTD: $550,000 · OtherTHE ISRAEL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY CENTERS LTDNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $437,701 · OtherNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INCTHE RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT - BNEI AKIVA OF THE UNITED STATES AND: $406,588 · OtherTHE RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT - BNEI AKIVA OF THE UNITED …Individual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $225,317 · OtherHAMERCAS LECHINUCH YEHUDI TZIONI (OFAKIM): $180,000 · Other+27 more: $1,391,617 · Other+27 moreINTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING I: $400,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL MA…NAMES NOT NUMBERS INC: $284,160 · EducationNAMES NOT NUMBER…PRIZMAH CENTER FOR JEWISH DAY SCHOOLS INC: $150,000 · EducationPRIZMAH CENTER F…YESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $120,000 · EducationYESHIVA UNIVERSI…YESHIVAT HEATID INC: $111,111 · EducationYESHIVAT HEATID …HEBREW AT THE CENTER INC: $100,000 · EducationHEBREW AT THE CE…HILLEL SCHOOL OF TAMPA INC: $50,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $500,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN F…Jewish Community Centers of Chicago: $210,000 · Human ServicesJewish Com…ASSOCIATION OF JEWISH AGING SERVICES: $45,250 · Human ServicesASSOCIATIO…+2 more: $32,336 · Human ServicesRAMAH IN THE ROCKIES: $270,000 · Recreation & SportsRAMAH IN …CAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC: $200,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP MOSH…BEBER CAMP PROPERTY INC: $110,465 · Recreation & SportsBEBER CAM…EDEN VILLAGE CAMP INC: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsEDEN VILL…+5 more: $60,000 · Recreation & Sports+5 moreTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $288,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $369,025 · Civil RightsHOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND: $200,000 · Health
Other$4,811,223Education$1,215,271Human Services$787,586Recreation & Sports$690,465Philanthropy$438,000Civil Rights$369,025Health$200,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $500,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $437,701 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING I: $400,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $369,025 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $288,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMES NOT NUMBERS INC: $284,160 over 2y, 30% of budgetRAMAH IN THE ROCKIES: $270,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $225,317 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetJewish Community Centers of Chicago: $210,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND: $200,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC: $200,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetJEP CONGREGATION OF LONG ISLAND: $156,735 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRIZMAH CENTER FOR JEWISH DAY SCHOOLS INC: $150,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTHE JEWISH STUDIO PROJECT: $126,745 over 1y, 17% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $120,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $112,400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVAT HEATID INC: $111,111 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBEBER CAMP PROPERTY INC: $110,465 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHEBREW AT THE CENTER INC: $100,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetDRISHA INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH EDUCATION INC: $84,375 over 1y, 32% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $56,416 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSPERTUS INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP: $50,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEDEN VILLAGE CAMP INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHILLEL SCHOOL OF TAMPA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetASSOCIATION OF JEWISH AGING SERVICES: $45,250 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetNETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES INC: $22,336 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG JUDAEA CAMP TEL YEHUDAH INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMIDWEST CAMPERS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWilderness Torah: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP HACHSHARA-MOSHAVA OF NY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHERZL CAMP FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN THE POCONOS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for Jewish…The Harold Grinspoon …Ahba IncYlry IncJewish Communal FundThe Shimon Ben Joseph…Clrc IncLmcl IncOclo IncJewish Community Fede…Covenant FoundationThe Jewish Federation…
Foundation for Jewish Camp IncNY38.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc · The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Ahba Inc · Ylry Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Clrc Inc · Lmcl Inc · Oclo Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Covenant Foundation · The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hlmh Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hlmh Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Hillel School of Tampa Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hlmh Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hlmh Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hlmh’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home