· Private foundation
Hlh Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $105k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IMOPACT ASSETS INC | $200,000 |
| THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR TOTUS TUUS FUND (KRR) | $200,000 |
| AMALGAMATED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| UNLOCKING DOORS | $135,000 |
| KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH | $125,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN | $125,000 |
| TEXAS WOMENS FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| NOMI NETWORK INC | $100,000 |
| WAY TO RISE | $100,000 |
| ALL STARS PROJECT | $75,000 |
| FRACTURED ATLAS PRODUCTIONS INC | $75,000 |
| EQUALITY NOW INC | $50,000 |
| WOMEN'S MEDIA CENTER | $50,000 |
| NEW YORK WOMENS FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| RC ACTIVITIES | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $233k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $385k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN4× · 2021–2024 · $337k · revenue +25% · 48% of their budget
- UDUnlocking Doors Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $215k · revenue +23%
- NNNOMI NETWORK INC4× · 2021–2024 · $168k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- TTOBETone grant, 2023 · $65k
MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +150%- TJTHE JENSEN PROJECT INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $48k · revenue +64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.
The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…
Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.
IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing
Wbenc's mission is to fuel economic growth globally by identifying, certifying, and facilitating the development of women-owned businesses.
Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.
Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.
To channel collective power and resources in solidarity with movements to advance the organization's vision of creating a just and sustainable world where everyone can safely and freely determine their own futures.
The sisterhood is global institute, inc. (sigi) has consultative status with the united nations, and for more than three decades has played a leading policy-formulation, strategic and activist role in the evolution of the international…
Engage more individuals in the civic process, educate them about the impact of public policies on their lives and our economy, and build support for policies that empower individuals.
Founded in 1995 wfpg works to expand the foreign policy dialogue across policital divides and generations and to support women at every stake of their careers. as champions of womens leadership we are proud of our role in expanding the…
Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ms Foundation for Women Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Jensen Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN ↗
- Who funds Unlocking Doors Inc ↗
- Who funds IMPACTASSETSINC ↗
- Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Texas Women's Foundation ↗
- Who funds NOMI NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WAY TO RISE ↗
- Who funds Equality Now Inc ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE JENSEN PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Solidaire Network Inc ↗
- Who funds DALLAS SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds ENTRYWAY ↗
- Who funds NEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE GROUNDSWELL GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGO RELATIONSHIPS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN CROSS DMZ Attn CATHI CHOI ↗
- Who funds Daybreak University ↗
- Who funds THE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds Fordham University ↗
- Who funds Texas Appleseed ↗
- Who funds THE SYNERGOS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds NATION FUND FOR INDEPENDENT JOURNALISMINC ↗
- Who funds GODLY RESPONSE TO ABUSE IN THE ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN WOMEN'S POLITICAL INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Embrey Family Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · The Dallas Foundation · Tides Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The San Francisco Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hlh Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Gordon College — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hlh Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Hlh Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.