Skip to content
Hlh Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Hlh Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$640kReligion$605kCrime & Legal$393kInternational$387kYouth Development$255kHuman Services$253kHealth$251kArts & Culture$235kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.6M
$100,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMOPACT ASSETS INC$200,000
THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR TOTUS TUUS FUND (KRR)$200,000
AMALGAMATED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$200,000
UNLOCKING DOORS$135,000
KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH$125,000
FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN$125,000
TEXAS WOMENS FOUNDATION$100,000
NOMI NETWORK INC$100,000
WAY TO RISE$100,000
ALL STARS PROJECT$75,000
FRACTURED ATLAS PRODUCTIONS INC$75,000
EQUALITY NOW INC$50,000
WOMEN'S MEDIA CENTER$50,000
NEW YORK WOMENS FOUNDATION$50,000
RC ACTIVITIES$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $233k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $70k → 17%NEW YORK WOMENS FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%THE NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%THE NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%THE JENSEN PROJECT: $48k → 14%THE GROUNDSWELL GROUP INC: $30k → 17%CHANGE AGENT NETWORK: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CT
CA
VA
MD
KS
DC
HI
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 12 repeat orgs$866k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
26

Total granted

$2.0M
$481k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+8%

Still filing today

75%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $385k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationInternationalCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN
    4× · 2021–2024 · $337k · revenue +25% · 48% of their budget
  • UD
    Unlocking Doors Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $215k · revenue +23%
  • NN
    NOMI NETWORK INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $168k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • T
    TOBET
    one grant, 2023 · $65k
  • MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +150%
  • TJ
    THE JENSEN PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $48k · revenue +64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Womens Funding Network

Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.

Education
2
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
3
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
4
International Womens Writing Guild

IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing

Education
5
Women's Business Enterprise National Council

Wbenc's mission is to fuel economic growth globally by identifying, certifying, and facilitating the development of women-owned businesses.

Civil Rights
6
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
7
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
8
Women Donors Network Action

To channel collective power and resources in solidarity with movements to advance the organization's vision of creating a just and sustainable world where everyone can safely and freely determine their own futures.

—
9
Sisterhood Is Global Institute Inc

The sisterhood is global institute, inc. (sigi) has consultative status with the united nations, and for more than three decades has played a leading policy-formulation, strategic and activist role in the evolution of the international…

International
10
Independent Women's Forum

Engage more individuals in the civic process, educate them about the impact of public policies on their lives and our economy, and build support for policies that empower individuals.

Civil Rights
11
Womens Foreign Policy Group Inc

Founded in 1995 wfpg works to expand the foreign policy dialogue across policital divides and generations and to support women at every stake of their careers. as champions of womens leadership we are proud of our role in expanding the…

International
12
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ms Foundation for Women Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Jensen Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
17/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR TOTUS TUUS FUND (KRR): $605,000 · OtherTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR TOTUS TUUS FUND (KRR)ALL STARS PROJECT: $225,000 · OtherALL STARS PROJECTTexas Women's Foundation: $175,000 · OtherTexas Women's FoundationKRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH: $125,000 · OtherKRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTHTOBET: $65,000 · Other+17 more: $328,000 · Other+17 moreFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN: $336,500 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR WOMENIMPACTASSETSINC: $200,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACTASSETSINCAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $200,000 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable Foun…Solidaire Network Inc: $40,000 · PhilanthropyDALLAS SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $30,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $55,000 · Philanthropy+3 moreUnlocking Doors Inc: $215,000 · Crime & LegalUnlocking Do…NOMI NETWORK INC: $167,500 · Crime & LegalNOMI NETWORK…+1 more: $10,000 · Crime & LegalNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesTHE JENSEN PROJECT INC: $48,000 · Human ServicesTHE GROUNDSWELL GROUP INC: $30,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC: $125,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureEquality Now Inc: $100,000 · InternationalWOMEN CROSS DMZ Attn CATHI CHOI: $25,000 · InternationalTHE SYNERGOS INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 · InternationalSouthwest Jewish Congress: $10,000 · InternationalWAY TO RISE: $100,000 · EducationFordham University: $20,000 · EducationUNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $10,000 · EducationGORDON COLLEGE: $5,000 · Education
Other$1,523,000Philanthropy$861,500Crime & Legal$392,500Human Services$233,000Arts & Culture$200,000International$145,000Education$135,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN: $336,500 over 4y, 48% of budgetUnlocking Doors Inc: $215,000 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTexas Women's Foundation: $175,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetNOMI NETWORK INC: $167,500 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC: $125,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetEquality Now Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWAY TO RISE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JENSEN PROJECT INC: $48,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSolidaire Network Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $30,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE GROUNDSWELL GROUP INC: $30,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetNEST FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetENTRYWAY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDaybreak University: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetWOMEN CROSS DMZ Attn CATHI CHOI: $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFordham University: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Appleseed: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATION FUND FOR INDEPENDENT JOURNALISMINC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE SYNERGOS INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGODLY RESPONSE TO ABUSE IN THE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSouthwest Jewish Congress: $10,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN WOMEN'S POLITICAL INITIATIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetGORDON COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHANGE AGENT NETWORK INC ERIC WOWOH: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Embrey Family Foundat…Texas Women's Foundat…Amalgamated Charitabl…The Ford FoundationAlice Kleberg Reynold…The Dallas FoundationTides FoundationThe Chicago Community…The San Francisco Fou…Greater Houston Commu…National Philanthropi…
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX18.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Embrey Family Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · The Dallas Foundation · Tides Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The San Francisco Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hlh Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hlh Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Gordon College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hlh Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hlh Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hlh Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home