· Private foundation
Hitt Contracting Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $458k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $74k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON | $73,750 |
| WASHINGTON NATIONALS PHILANTHROPIES | $48,000 |
| TRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL | $45,000 |
| THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $30,000 |
| NATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT & RECOVERY | $29,555 |
| WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION | $28,580 |
| BREAKTHROUGH T1D - MID ATLANTIC | $26,100 |
| ACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF AMERICA INC | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC | $20,700 |
| FINABILITY | $20,000 |
| THE CITADEL FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM | $20,000 |
| JK COMMUNITY FARM | $15,000 |
| LOUDOUN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $15,000 |
| HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $356k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NBNATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM2× · 2023–2024 · $184k · revenue +32%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE2× · 2023–2024 · $92k · revenue +16%
- NCNATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY3× · 2022–2024 · $65k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- TMTravis Manion Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $27k · revenue +27%
- JJDRFone grant, 2023 · $26k
- TDTROOPSTER DONATION CORPgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +57%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ia Reach Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE ↗
- Who funds TRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds ACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON NATIONALS PHILANTHROPIES ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds Travis Manion Foundation ↗
- Who funds TROOPSTER DONATION CORP ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CITADEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FinAbility ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
- Who funds JK COMMUNITY FARM ↗
- Who funds LOUDOUN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds The Virginia Hospital Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds BLOOM OUR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds CARBON LEADERSHIP FORUM ↗
- Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds AGC EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds READY WILLING & WORKING INC ↗
- Who funds CARINGMATTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Casey Trees ↗
- Who funds UNIDOSUS ↗
- Who funds IA REACH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Women's Center ↗
- Who funds LOUDOUN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Washington Forrest Foundation · Community Foundation for Loudoun and Northern Fauquier Counties · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Adams Charitable Foundation · The Jv Schiro Zavela Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hitt Contracting Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.