Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hitchens Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$341k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$195kReligion$91kEducation$79kHuman Services$44kHousing & Shelter$32kInternational$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kRecreation & Sports$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $205k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
$5,264
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS$95,000
ST JOSEPH CHURCH$40,000
LELAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS$40,000
TRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC$35,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
PINE REST FOUNDATION$25,000
CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF NW MICHIGAN$20,000
SANTIAGO PANAMA MISSION ADVENTURE$10,000
ARCHANGEL GABRIEL GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH$10,000
CHRIST THE KING CHURCH$5,264
ST FRANCIS CHURCH$5,264
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH$5,264
ST WENCESLAUS CHURCH$5,263
LELAND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$5,000
CEDERVILLE MUSIC BOOSTER CLUB$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$285k · 31 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
4

Total granted

$285k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+138%

Still filing today

26%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $193k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthInternationalHousing & ShelterEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue +66%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +69%
  • CF
    CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • LT
    LELAND TOWNSHIP LIBRARY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • BL
    Bruces Legacy Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +138%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Pharmacy Foundation

To advance pharmacy through education, practice innovation and research focused on patient care, for the improvement and promotion of public health and public education.

Philanthropy
2
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
3
Mackinac Island Medical Center

To support funding of healthcare services for residents of mackinac island.

Health
4
Medical Care Access Coalition Inc

To promote cooperative medical services throughout marquette county and the upper peninsula of michigan that would provide a continuum of care for qualifying, uninsured, and/or under-insured persons.

—
5
Mackinac Straits Health Foundation

The organization's purpose is to support mackinac straits health system in order to improve the health status of the communities it serves.

Health
6
Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital

We, trinity health grand haven hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.trinity health grand haven hospital is a member of trinity…

Health
7
Michigan Animal Health Foundation

To provide financial assistance to individuals and institutions for educational and scientific purposes in order to advance science to benefit the health and welfare of animals.

Animals
8
Upper Peninsula Family Solutions Inc

The Agency is licensed by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services as a full-service adoption and foster care agency for families located in northern Michigan.

Human Services
9
Minnesota Hospital Foundation

The minnesota hospital foundation works on strategies that include data-led quality and safety improvement, education, research, training and leadership to improve the health of minnesotans.

—
10
Pace North

A provider of the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) which is a community-based, long-term care delivery program that provides comprehensive, coordinated, managed care to eligible participants.

Health
11
Lakeland Immediate Care Center

Our mission is to provide necessary, compassionate healthcare to people in our community.

Health
12
Michigan Health Leadership Fund

To advance the well-being of michigan residents through the promotion of sound public policies and responsible legislation. the purpose of these activities is to promote policies that strengthen the michigan health care system.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leelanau Township Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bruces Legacy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $95,000 · OtherMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONSST JOSEPH CHURCH: $49,000 · OtherST JOSEPH CHURCHLELAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $40,000 · OtherLELAND PUBLIC SCHOOLSCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $26,000 · OtherCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INCARCHANGEL GABRIEL GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $15,500 · OtherGRAND TRAVERSE AREA CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $14,000 · OtherMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION - COWELL CANCER CENTER: $13,000 · Other+30 more: $110,355 · Other+30 moreTRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION: $42,000 · HealthTRAVERSE HEA…MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 · HealthMUNSON MEDIC…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $31,500 · Housing & ShelterPINE REST FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesFATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Human ServicesSANTIAGO PANAMA MISSION ADVENTURES: $10,000 · InternationalLEELANAU TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyLEELANAU CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1,550 · Education
Other$362,855Health$52,000Housing & Shelter$31,500Human Services$27,500International$10,000Philanthropy$2,000Education$1,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $95,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION: $42,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $31,500 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $26,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPINE REST FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTIAGO PANAMA MISSION ADVENTURES: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetMUNSON MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLEELANAU TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLEELANAU CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1,550 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION: $1,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBruces Legacy Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds TRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE REST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANTIAGO PANAMA MISSION ADVENTURES ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FATHER FRED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Traverse Regional Community FoundationMI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · The John and Matilda Shumsky Foundation · The Art and Mary Schmuckal Family Foundation · The Broad Family Foundation · Oleson Foundation · The Carls Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hitchens Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hitchens Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hitchens Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph