Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hiram Francis Mills Trust Uwill #0704163

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$135kHealth$92kYouth Development$53kReligion$8kCrime & Legal$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,801
Median grant
2
States reached
$374k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC$8,892
TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INC$4,472
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LOWELL$4,472
HOME HEALTH VNA$4,446
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE$4,446
YWCA OF LOWELL$3,801
YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSCIATIONS$3,801
LOWELL GENERAL HOSPITAL$3,578
LGH CHARITABLE TRUST INC$2,964
YWCA OF NORTHEASTERN MA$2,964
MERRIMACK VALLEY YMCA$2,964
MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN$2,236
SALVATION ARMY OF MASSACHUSETTS$1,482
MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN LAWRENCE$1,482
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%GREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA: $8k → 8%TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INC: $4k → 8%TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INC: $4k → 8%GREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA: $4k → 8%GREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA: $4k → 8%FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC: $9k → 10%FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC: $9k → 10%FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC: $9k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$309k · 21 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$309k
$1k

Still filing today

43%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LOWELL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +117%
  • THE LOWELL GENERAL HOSPITAL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +35%
  • MV
    MERRIMACK VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tufts Medicine Inc

Our mission, vision and values are our guiding light. together, we bring them to life with our care, our actions, our learning and our commitment to excellence.at tufts medicine, we know the power of community. it's that feeling of being…

Health
2
Tufts Medicine Integrated Network Inc

To bring together private practice and employed physicians, community-based and academic care providers, and primary care and medical and surgical specialists to improve care and reduce costs for defined populations.

Health
3
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
4
Tufts Medical Center Physicians Organization Inc

The tufts medical center physicians organization, inc. supports the tufts group practices in their mission of providing quality health care services to the patients of tufts medical center, inc. and to the residents of the community it…

Health
5
Tufts Medicine Care At Home Parent Inc

Tufts medicine care at home parent, inc.'s primary purposes are to act as a holding company and provide management services to affiliated home care providers providing services to patients in the merrimack valley and other regions,…

Health
6
Home Care Inc

Home care, inc.'s primary purposes were to provide home health care, homemaker and personal care services.

Health
7
New England Quality Care Alliance Inc

New england quality care alliance, inc. operates for the purpose of supporting activities of tufts medical center parent, inc. and its affiliates. new england quality care alliance, inc. was formed to improve the health of patients and to…

Health
8
Community Medical Associates Inc

To provide sophisticated, high quality, and passionate patient-centered care to the general public.

Health
9
Greater Lowell Health Alliance Chna 10 Inc

To sustain a strategic alliance of community organizations that improves the overall health and wellness of those living in the greater lowell region. by raising awareness and providing resources for our communities, schools, civic and…

Health
10
Emerson Health System Inc

Emerson health systems is the parent organization of four subsidiaries - emerson hospital, emerson occupational health services, emerson property development and emerson health care foundation. emerson health systems provides its…

Health
11
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
12
Berkshire Health Systems Inc

The mission of berkshire health systems is to advance health & wellness for everyone in our community in a welcoming,inclusive & personalized environment.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lowell General Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Boys & Girls Club of Greater Lowell Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY SERVICES INC: $26,490 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES INCCIRCLE HOME INC: $17,773 · OtherCIRCLE HOME INCLGH Charitable Trust Inc: $17,728 · OtherLGH Charitable Trust IncYWCA OF LOWELL: $15,204 · OtherYWCA OF LOWELLBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE: $13,347 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCEBOYS & GIRLS CLUB LAWRENCE: $13,245 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB LAWRENCEYWCA OF NORTHEASTERN MA: $8,898 · OtherYWCA OF NORTHEASTERN MAIndividual grant recipient: $8,887 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $8,864 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF MASSACHUSETTSYWCA OF NORTEASTERN MA: $8,830 · OtherYWCA OF NORTEASTERN MAYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSCIATIONS: $7,602 · OtherYMCA OF GREATER LOWELL: $7,505 · Other+2 more: $5,900 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC: $26,694 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF…GREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA: $15,107 · Human ServicesGREATER LOWELL FAM…TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INC: $8,944 · Human ServicesTUFTS MEDICINE CAR…HOME HEALTH VNA INC: $26,592 · HealthHOME HEALTH VNA I…THE LOWELL GENERAL HOSPITAL: $21,376 · HealthTHE LOWELL GENERA…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LOWELL INC: $26,717 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLU…MERRIMACK VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $17,728 · Youth DevelopmentMERRIMACK VALLEY…MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN: $7,436 · Crime & Legal
Other$160,273Human Services$50,745Health$47,968Youth Development$44,445Crime & Legal$7,436

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LOWELL INC: $26,717 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC: $26,694 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOME HEALTH VNA INC: $26,592 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LOWELL GENERAL HOSPITAL: $21,376 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE HOME INC: $17,773 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetMERRIMACK VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $17,728 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLGH Charitable Trust Inc: $17,728 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA: $15,107 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INC: $8,944 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN: $7,436 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LOWELL INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOME HEALTH VNA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOWELL GENERAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds MERRIMACK VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LGH Charitable Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Demoulas Foundation · DCU for Kids · Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Aubert J Fay Charitable Fund · Greater Lowell Health Alliance Chna 10 Inc · RCB Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hiram Francis Mills Trust Uwill #0704163 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hiram Francis Mills Trust Uwill #0704163. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greater Lowell Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Family Services of the Merrimack Valley Inc: 11% of income from government
  • The Lowell General Hospital: 5% of income from government
  • Tufts Medicine Care at Home Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hiram Francis Mills Trust Uwill #0704163’s filings →

More from the funding graph