· Public charity
Greater Lowell Health Alliance Chna 10 Inc
To sustain a strategic alliance of community organizations that improves the overall health and wellness of those living in the greater lowell region.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $156,565 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $197,746 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $41,181 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TOWN OF WESTFORD | $40,000 |
| LOWELL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $25,000 |
| LOWELL PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $20,300 |
| CAMBODIAN MUTUTAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION | $18,865 |
| YMCA | $12,400 |
| TUFTS-LOWELL GENERAL HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| TOWN OF CHELMSFORD | $10,000 |
| CHALLENGE UNLIMITED AT IRONESTONE FARM | $10,000 |
| THE MEGAN HOUSE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $164k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +104% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LHLOWELL HOUSE INC6× · 2017–2022 · $249k · revenue +278%
- LCLOWELL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC5× · 2017–2024 · $163k · revenue +78%
- MCMILL CITY GROWS INC7× · 2017–2023 · $104k · revenue +104%
Funded once
- CECASA ESPERANZA INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $59k · revenue +29%
- CTCHELMSFORD- TOWN OF (SENIOR CENTER)one grant, 2022 · $50k
Community Teamwork Incone grant, 2022 · $45k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.
To sustain a strategic alliance of community organizations that improves the overall health and wellness of those living in the greater lowell region. by raising awareness and providing resources for our communities, schools, civic and…
Mfhc is committed to ending systemic housing discrimination and creating inclusive communities through education, outreach, advocacy, housing counseling and enforcement.
The purpose and mission of community counseling of bristol county, inc. (ccbc) is to develop and deliver compassionate, responsive, culturally competent, and quality mental health and substance abuse services to meet the…
We work to ensure that individuals with disabilities can live independently as equal members of society.
Metro housing boston mobilizes wide-ranging resources to provide innovative and personalized services that lead families and individuals to housing stability, economic security, and an improved quality of life.
Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…
To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.
Brookview's mission is to help homeless and at risk families learn the skills necessary to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty.
Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.
The Well's mission is to deliver real solutions in behavioral health through compassion, innovation, and collaboration. By building an inclusive community, we offer comprehensive treatment and resources to empower individuals of diverse…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lowell Community Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is African Community Center of Lowell. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOWELL HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds LOWELL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MILL CITY GROWS INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LOWELL INC ↗
- Who funds CASA ESPERANZA INC ↗
- Who funds Community Teamwork Inc ↗
- Who funds ELLIE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX MULTISPORT INC ↗
- Who funds LOWELL TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA ↗
- Who funds ELIOT COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CLARENDON EARLY EDUCATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LOWELL INC ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGE UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HOPE & HEALING INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS ALLIANCE OF PORTUGUESE SPEAKERS INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR A BETTER ACRE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MEGAN HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOWELL INC ↗
- Who funds Cambodian Mutual Assistance Association of Greater Lowell Inc ↗
- Who funds HISTORY UNERASED INC ↗
- Who funds PLACE OF PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOWELL GENERAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER LOWELL ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds LOWELL PARKS & CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds DWELLING HOUSE OF HOPE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Lowell Community Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Theodore Edson Parker Foundation · Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Health Resources in Action Inc · Richard K & Nancy L Donahue Charitable Foundation · We Share A Common Thread Foundation Inc · Aubert J Fay Charitable Fund · Lowell Five Charitable Foundation Inc · The Battles Foundation Inc · The Saab Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater Lowell Health Alliance Chna 10 Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Hope & Healing Inc — 73% of income from government
- Casa Esperanza Inc — 59% of income from government
- Douglas a Thom Clinic Inc — 37% of income from government
- Lowell Community Health Center Inc — 34% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Greater Lowell Inc — 27% of income from government
- Clarendon Early Education Services Inc — 25% of income from government
- International Institute of New England Inc — 24% of income from government
- Community Teamwork Inc — 23% of income from government
- Ellie Fund Inc — 15% of income from government
- The Megan House Foundation Inc — 15% of income from government
- Family Services of the Merrimack Valley Inc — 11% of income from government
- Mill City Grows Inc — 7% of income from government
- Dwelling House of Hope Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Lowell General Hospital — 5% of income from government
- Massachusetts Alliance of Portuguese Speakers Inc — 4% of income from government
- Merrimack Valley Food Bank Inc — 3% of income from government
- History Unerased Inc — 3% of income from government
- Girls Incorporated of Greater Lowell — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.