Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Herrman Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$582k
Granted FY2023
31
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$200k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

64% of Herrman Family Charitable Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 17 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Herrman Family Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 19 organizations, $582k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

22
20
22
21
28
22
19
23
17
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Philanthropy$899kEducation$486kFood & Nutrition$420kAnimals$265kCivil Rights$213kHealth$101kArts & Culture$95kInternational$92kOther$0
02FY2023 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k17 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $142k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $415k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UBS Donor Advised Fund$200,000
MSPCA$65,000
QGLBTQ Legal Advocates GLAD$50,000
Greater Boston PFLAG$50,000
Worcester Academy$50,000
Nativity School of Worcester$27,143
Good Two Know Partners$25,000
Kennedy Health Center$21,917
Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute$15,000
Pan Mass Challenge$13,077
Fay School$10,000
Catholic Schools Foundation$10,000
Esperanza Academy$10,000
Call2Talk$10,000
Out Metrowest$7,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Small Cell Ovarian Cancer Foundatio: $500 → 8%Massachusetts Wonderfund Inc: $25k → 16%Mass211 Inc: $10k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST: $5k → 8%Home for Little Wanderers: $10k → 16%Brazilian American Center BRACE: $3k → 8%Brazilian-American Center BRACE: $3k → 8%Jewish Family Service of Metrowest: $510 → 8%Jewish Family Service of Metrowest: $500 → 8%Good Shepherd Community Care: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
KY
VA
MD
DE
DC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 33 repeat orgs$589k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2023, 14 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
41

Total granted

$1.8M
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+17%

Still filing today

76%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $104k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $252k · revenue +49%
  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $125k · revenue +44%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $90k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $43k
  • MW
    MASSACHUSETTS WONDERFUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -14%
  • CS
    CONNELLY SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD
    one grant, 2022 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
3
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
6
The Boston Foundation for Sight Inc

Our mission is to improve quality of life by transforming the understanding, treatment, and care of the ocular surface.

Human Services
7
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
8
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
9
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

10
Edward M Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate Inc

The edward m. kennedy institute for the united states senate is dedicated to educating the public about the important role of the united states senate in our system of government, encouraging participatory democracy, invigorating civil…

Arts & Culture
11
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
12
Massachusetts Foundation for the Humanities & Public Policy Inc

We create opportunities for the people of massachusetts to transform their lives and build a more equitable commonwealth through the humanities.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service of Metrowest Inc and the most unlike its peers is Small Cell Ovarian Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterEnvironmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesJewish Community Organizati…Policy Research and AdvocacyYouth Development CentersCommunity FoundationsYouth Sports ProgramsCancer Support ServicesLocal History MuseumsLgbtq+ Community SupportUnited Way AffiliatesSchool District FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%5%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%25%10–20yr19%24%20–35yr14%14%35–55yr14%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr19%47%20–35yr14%7%35–55yr14%39%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/62
the rest of the field
11%
4,713/42,296

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/59
Grantees still filing
41/59
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Harvest for Hope Inc — $420,000 · OtherHarvest for Hope IncGreater Boston PFLAG — $211,110 · OtherGreater Boston PFLAGUBS Donor Advised Fund — $200,000 · OtherUBS Donor Advised FundIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGood Two Know Partners — $80,000 · OtherPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $63,180 · OtherDon Bosco Cristo Rey High — $60,000 · OtherNATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC — $55,143 · Other+60 more — $426,346 · Other+60 moreRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $600,000 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Charitable …+5 more — $17,498 · PhilanthropyVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $125,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNI…WORCESTER ACADEMY — $75,000 · EducationWORCESTER ACA…THE FAY SCHOOL INC — $45,005 · EducationTHE FAY SCHOO…CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $38,500 · EducationCATHOLIC SCHO…KIMBALL UNION ACADEMY — $20,000 · EducationKIMBALL UNION…BOSTON BOOK FESTIVAL INC — $16,750 · EducationBETHANY HILL PLACE — $13,000 · EducationESPERANZA ACADEMY INC — $12,500 · Education+1 more — $2,000 · EducationMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $252,000 · AnimalsMASSACHUS…+5 more — $7,650 · AnimalsSave The Children Federation Inc — $90,000 · International+1 more — $1,080 · InternationalMASSACHUSETTS WONDERFUND INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesMASS211 INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST INC — $6,010 · Human ServicesBRAZILIAN AMERICAN CENTER INC — $5,500 · Human Services+2 more — $1,500 · Human ServicesOUT METROWEST INC — $22,500 · Civil RightsCAIR-MA INC — $1,500 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $1,030 · Civil Rights
Other$1,615,779Philanthropy$617,498Education$347,755Animals$259,650International$91,080Human Services$58,010Civil Rights$25,030

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $600,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $252,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER ACADEMY — $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $63,180 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC — $55,143 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRATTLESTICK PRODUCTIONS INC — $45,800 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FAY SCHOOL INC — $45,005 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $38,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS WONDERFUND INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOUT METROWEST INC — $22,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetKIMBALL UNION ACADEMY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRAMINGHAM HISTORY CENTER INC — $18,250 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetBOSTON BOOK FESTIVAL INC — $16,750 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLOUCESTER MARINE GENOMICS INSTITUTE INCORPORATED — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBETHANY HILL PLACE — $13,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetESPERANZA ACADEMY INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMETROWEST NONPROFIT NETWORK INC — $11,500 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetOPEN AVENUES FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASS211 INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMuseum of African American History Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST INC — $6,010 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBRAZILIAN AMERICAN CENTER INC — $5,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetA Place To Turn Inc — $5,256 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRED BULL THEATER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST COONHOUND RESCUE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $1,545 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAIR-MA INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE MASS INC — $1,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORKING FOR WORCESTER INC — $1,080 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSUDBURY VALLEY TRUSTEES INC — $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE — $1,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC — $1,005 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUARDIANS OF RESCUE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAPE ANN MUSEUM INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSQUASHBUSTERS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE A DOG INC — $950 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFramingham Country Club Charitable Organization Inc — $865 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetEDWARD M KENNEDY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLions Clubs International Foundation — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUSSIAN JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $512 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc)MA30.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Middlesex Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc · The Sudbury Foundation · Metrowest Health Foundation Inc · Avidia Charitable Foundation Inc · MutualOne Charitable Foundation · Highland Street Connection and Subsidiaries · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Analog Devices Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Herrman Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 200%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • MASS211 Inc79% of income from government
  • Museum of African American History Inc43% of income from government
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc38% of income from government
  • Cape Ann Museum Inc38% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • United Way of Tri County Inc18% of income from government
  • Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute Incorporated16% of income from government
  • Hospice of the Good Shepherd Inc13% of income from government
  • Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc11% of income from government
  • Edward M Kennedy Community Health Center Inc10% of income from government
  • Out Metrowest Inc9% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Peabody Essex Museum Inc3% of income from government
  • Boston Book Festival Inc2% of income from government
  • Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc1% of income from government
  • Hopkinton Center for the Arts1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
20get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Herrman Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Herrman Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph