Skip to content

· Private foundation

Heritage Youth-for-All-Nations Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$86k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$258kInternational$123kYouth Development$15kCivil Rights$11kPhilanthropy$10kScience & Tech$5kArts & Culture$2kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $51k
$4,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$52k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Daybreak Development$30,000
Frontiers$11,300
OMF$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,900
TEAM$6,200
National Network of Youth Ministrie$4,100
Intervarsity Christian Fellowship$4,000
Cincinnati Chinese Church$3,100
Chinese Bible Mission$3,100
Blue Ridge Christian Counseling$2,500
Artists in Christian Testimony$1,400
CRU$1,200
Ethnos 360$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 22% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Westminster Presbyterian Church: $2k → 22%Chinese Bible Mission: $3k → 9%Ethnos 360: $2k → 11%Cru: $2k → 13%Daybreak Development: $30k → 6%LDI Foundation: $3k → 8%PCA Foundation: $2k → 9%OMF: $30k → 8%Cincinnati Chinese Church: $10k → 16%TEAM: $6k → 7%Moody Bible Institute: $7k → 14%Christian Renewal Ministries: $3k → 8%Blue Ridge Christian Counseling: $3k → 21%Answers in Genesis: $7k → 7%Westminster Theological Seminary: $2k → 22%Chinese Bible Mission: $3k → 9%Ethos: $2k → 11%Daybreak Development: $30k → 6%LDI Foundation: $3k → 8%OMF: $30k → 8%Cincinnati Chinese Church: $10k → 16%TEAM: $6k → 7%Moody Bible Institute: $7k → 14%Christian Renewal Ministries: $3k → 8%Blue Ridge Christian Counseling: $2k → 21%Answers in Genesis: $7k → 7%Westminster Presbyterian Church: $2k → 22%Chinese Bible Mission: $3k → 9%Ethnos 360: $2k → 11%Daybreak Development: $26k → 6%OMF: $30k → 8%Cincinnati Chinese Church: $10k → 16%TEAM: $6k → 7%Moody Bible Institute: $7k → 14%Christian Renewal Ministries: $3k → 8%Answers in Genesis: $7k → 7%Daybreak Development: $25k → 6%OMF: $10k → 8%Cincinnati Chinese Church: $7k → 16%Team: $6k → 7%Daybreak Development: $20k → 6%OMF: $10k → 8%Cincinnati Chinese Church: $3k → 16%TEAM: $6k → 7%Daybreak Development: $20k → 6%OMF: $10k → 8%OMF: $5k → 8%OMF: $4k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Heritage Youth-for-All-Nations Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Heritage Youth-for-All-Nations Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$643k · 20 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$643k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+46%

Still filing today

35%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DD
    DAYBREAK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $151k · revenue +55%
  • IC
    InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +9%
  • AI
    ANSWERS IN GENESIS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $21k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue 0%
  • WT
    WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +46%
  • E
    Ethos
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
3
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
5
Tyndale Bible Translators

Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services

Religion
6
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
7
Charis Bible College Inc

Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.

Religion
8
Biblical Education By Extension Inc

To assist the church, primarily in closed countries, in the establishment of continuing indigenous church-based training centers in which servant leaders are equipped to develop growing and reproducing churches.

Religion
9
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
10
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
11
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
12
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA; the most unlike its peers is Daybreak Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OMF: $128,600 · OtherOMFIndividual grant recipient: $63,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCINCINNATI CHINESE CHURCH: $39,100 · OtherCINCINNATI CHINESE CHURCHTEAM: $30,200 · OtherTEAMAmbassadors for Christ: $21,000 · OtherAmbassadors for ChristNational Network of Youth Ministries: $18,100 · Other+12 more: $63,200 · Other+12 moreDAYBREAK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $151,000 · InternationalDAYBREAK DEVELOPMENT CORP…MIO Frontiers: $80,900 · ReligionMIO FrontiersInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $24,400 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian …ANSWERS IN GENESIS INC: $21,000 · ReligionANSWERS IN GENESIS INCCHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION INC: $7,000 · ReligionLDI FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Religion+1 more: $4,200 · ReligionThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $21,000 · Education
Other$364,100International$151,000Religion$143,500Education$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAYBREAK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $151,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetMIO Frontiers: $80,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANSWERS IN GENESIS INC: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNational Network of Youth Ministries: $18,100 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetChristian Renewal Ministries Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLDI FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBlue Ridge Christian Counseling: $4,900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetARTISTS IN CHRISTIAN TESTIMONY INC: $4,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAYBREAK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MIO Frontiers ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds ANSWERS IN GENESIS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds National Network of Youth Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Christian Renewal Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds LDI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Blue Ridge Christian Counseling ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS IN CHRISTIAN TESTIMONY INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA13.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heritage Youth-for-All-Nations Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heritage Youth-for-All-Nations Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Heritage Youth-for-All-Nations Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Heritage Youth-for-All-Nations Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heritage Youth-for-All-Nations’ filings →

    More from the funding graph