Skip to content

· Private foundation

Herbert Zimmerman Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$148kYouth Development$75kHealth$27kPhilanthropy$14kHuman Services$13kHousing & Shelter$7kEducation$5kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$79k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WE WANT MORE$30,000
WARWICK HOPE ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$3,000
CORP CHARITY GIVING$3,000
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$2,500
TURNING POINT USA$2,000
LOUDOUN SERENITY HOUSE$2,000
CHEERFUL HEART MINISTRIES$1,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500
NEW HOPE FOR KIDS$500
PAYPAL GIVING FUND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LITTLE ST NICK FOUNDATION: $500 → 6%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
KS
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$322k · 17 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
28

Total granted

$322k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+22%

Still filing today

41%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CHILDREN'S DREAM FUND INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $11k · revenue +37%
  • LS
    Loudoun Serenity House
    3× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +388%
  • SR
    STARTING RIGHT NOW
    2× · 2019–2020 · $3k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • JM
    JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +19%
  • CITY YEAR INC
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
3
Chase the Victory Corporation

Our mission is to strengthen the support of families grieving the loss of a child, fighting childhood cancer, and inspire hope and kindness.

Human Services
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
7
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
8
Wipe Out Kids' Cancer Inc

Wipe out kids cancer offers comfort and hope to kids with cancer through support programs serving the entire family and funds innovative research leading to new discoveries and treatments in the fight against pediatric cancer. "support and…

—
9
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Debbie's Dream Foundation

Debbie's dream foundation:curing stomach cancer is dedicated to raising awareness about stomach cancer, providing education, advocacy, and support internationally to patients, families, and caregivers affected by the disease, and advancing…

Human Services
12
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Dream Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is In Two Weeks Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
15/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

A LIGHT TO THE NATIONS: $116,000 · OtherA LIGHT TO THE NATIONSBOYS TOWN OF JERUSALEM: $75,000 · OtherBOYS TOWN OF JERUSALEMCHEERFUL HEART MINISTRIES: $15,500 · OtherCORP CHARITY GIVING: $15,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S DREAM FUND INC: $11,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10,000 · Other+30 more: $50,026 · Other+30 moreWE WANT MORE INC: $45,000 · PhilanthropyWE WANT MORE I…+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyNEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC: $2,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $1,000 · HealthBite Me Cancer Inc: $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthLoudoun Serenity House: $4,650 · Housing & ShelterORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterSUNCOAST VOICES FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Crime & LegalPEDAL THE CAUSE: $1,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE SAINT NICK FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Human ServicesTHE POTTER'S INN: $1,200 · Religion
Other$292,526Philanthropy$45,500Health$7,000Housing & Shelter$5,650Crime & Legal$2,500Human Services$2,500Religion$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWE WANT MORE INC: $45,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S DREAM FUND INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLoudoun Serenity House: $4,650 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSTARTING RIGHT NOW: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUNCOAST VOICES FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POTTER'S INN: $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIn Two Weeks Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBite Me Cancer Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $638 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SAINT NICK FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WE WANT MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DREAM FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Loudoun Serenity House ↗
  • Who funds STARTING RIGHT NOW ↗
  • Who funds SUNCOAST VOICES FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE POTTER'S INN ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds Global Samaritan Resources Inc ↗
  • Who funds In Two Weeks Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Bite Me Cancer Inc ↗
  • Who funds ORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL12.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Herbert Zimmerman Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Herbert Zimmerman Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Children's Dream Fund Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Herbert Zimmerman Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Herbert Zimmerman Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Herbert Zimmerman’s filings →

More from the funding graph