Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Herbert J & Ann M Rowe Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Human Services$47kReligion$36kHealth$19kEducation$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kPhilanthropy$8kAnimals$6kArts & Culture$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$366k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOWNTOWN ECUMENICAL SERVICES COUNCIL$7,700
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF$7,500
RIPPLE OF ONE$5,400
FOOTHILLS AREA YMCA$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FOOTHILLS AREA YMCA: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$131k · 10 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$131k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
+321%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHealthAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RO
    RIPPLE OF ONE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $43k · revenue +143%
  • FC
    FOOTHILLS CARE CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $19k · revenue +64%
  • RI
    READING IN MOTION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +321%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • JS
    J SMITH YOUNG YMCA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Owen County Family Ymca Inc

Putting christian principles into action and practice through programs that promote well being through physical fitness, and enhancement of personal growth for all members of the community through various programs offered.

Human Services
2
Family Ymca of Fayette County

The family ymca of fayette county offers various programs provided to promote christian values, health enhancement, family enrichment, and leadership development in youth and adults.

Human Services
3
Rocky Mount Family Ymca Inc

The mission of the rocky mount family ymca is to put christian principles into practice to improve the quality of life in our communities with programs and services that strengthen the spirit, mind and body for all.

4
Young Men's Christian Association of Southeast Texas

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services
5
Community Health Center of Richmond Inc

To provide quality health care and specialty services that are affordable and accessible.

Health
6
Piedmont Family Ymca Inc

Put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, & body.

Human Services
7
Ymca of Southeast Missouri

The ymca mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy body, mind and spirit for all. the ymca emphasizes the value of honesty, respect, caring and responsibility.

Human Services
8
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Provide quality healthcare to the people of edgecombe, nash and wilson counties.

9
Georgia Mountains Young Men's Christian

The ymca, ("the y") is a cause-driven organization that is for youth development, for healthy living, and for social responsibility.

Human Services
10
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

11
Illinois Valley Ymca

To put christian principles into practice that build a healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services
12
Richard G Snyder Ymca

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foothills Area Ymca and the most unlike its peers is Oconee County Humane Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DOWNTOWN ECUMENICAL SERVICES COUNCIL — $36,200 · OtherDOWNTOWN ECUMENICAL SERVICES COUNCILDESC Downtown Emergency Service Ctr — $7,700 · OtherDESC Downtown Emergency Service CtrCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF — $7,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OFEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF — $5,000 · OtherEDUCATION FOUNDATION OFJACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY — $3,500 · Other+4 more — $6,500 · Other+4 moreRIPPLE OF ONE — $43,443 · EducationRIPPLE OF ONEFOOTHILLS CARE CENTER INC — $18,700 · HealthFOOTHILLS CARE…READING IN MOTION — $6,000 · Arts & CultureOCONEE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $6,000 · AnimalsFOOTHILLS AREA YMCA — $2,500 · Human ServicesJ SMITH YOUNG YMCA INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $2,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$66,400Education$43,443Health$18,700Arts & Culture$6,000Animals$6,000Human Services$3,500Housing & Shelter$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRIPPLE OF ONE — $43,443 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetFOOTHILLS CARE CENTER INC — $18,700 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetREADING IN MOTION — $6,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOCONEE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFOOTHILLS AREA YMCA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJ SMITH YOUNG YMCA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RIPPLE OF ONE
  • Who funds FOOTHILLS CARE CENTER INC
  • Who funds READING IN MOTION
  • Who funds OCONEE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds FOOTHILLS AREA YMCA
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds J SMITH YOUNG YMCA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Herbert J & Ann M Rowe Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • St Matthews House Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph