Skip to content

· Private foundation

Herbert a Meisler Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$275k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$5.0MHealth$621kHousing & Shelter$106kPhilanthropy$35kReligion$30kHuman Services$24kCrime & Legal$12kPublic Benefit$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$250,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$842k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MITCHELL'S PLACE$250,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $100 → 12%CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $500 → 10%THE SEEING EYE: $100 → 4%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $500 → 7%JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $250 → 15%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $200 → 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%FUSE PROJECT: $100 → 19%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MOBILE: $2k → 19%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MOBILE: $1k → 19%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MOBILE: $1k → 19%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MOBILE: $1k → 19%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MOBILE: $600 → 19%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MOBILE: $500 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
OR
SD
IA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
VA
TN
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Herbert a Meisler Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in AL; by stated purpose, 0%.

Herbert a Meisler Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.9M · 38 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
38

Total granted

$5.9M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+3%

Still filing today

58%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthArts & CulturePublic BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MITCHELL'S PLACE INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $504k · revenue +107%
  • HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
    3× · 2019–2024 · $22k · revenue +41%
  • TC
    THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $12k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • JA
    JAGUAR ATHLETIC FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +77%
  • GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +7%
  • AP
    ALABAMA POLICY INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Air Transport Association of America Inc

Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…

—
2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
6
Childfund Alliance

Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…

International
7
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
8
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
9
American Academy of Pediatrics

The mission of the american academy of pediatrics is to obtain optimal physical, mental and social health for all infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. the academy seeks to promote this goal by encouraging and assisting its…

Health
10
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
11
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
12
The Jackson Laboratory

The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Alabama; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/49
Grantees still filing
35/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $5,009,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA+56 more: $289,313 · Other+56 moreMITCHELL'S PLACE INC: $504,350 · HealthMITCHELL'S …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100,000 · HealthAMERICAN CA…+2 more: $3,700 · HealthTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $25,000 · PhilanthropyMOBILE AREA JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $9,500 · PhilanthropyHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $21,500 · ReligionRonald McDonald House Charities of Mobile Inc: $6,100 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $2,200 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $500 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $500 · Human Services+4 more: $550 · Human ServicesMobile Symphony Inc: $2,829 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,575 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE: $1,000 · Arts & CultureANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,100 · Civil Rights
Other$5,298,313Health$608,050Philanthropy$34,500Religion$21,500Human Services$13,850Arts & Culture$5,404Civil Rights$5,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMITCHELL'S PLACE INC: $504,350 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $21,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $11,500 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetMOBILE AREA JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $9,500 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Mobile Inc: $6,100 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA: $3,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMobile Symphony Inc: $2,829 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALABAMA POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $2,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM FOCUS INC: $1,600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,575 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUTTS WITH A MISSION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE A STRAY: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUSE PROJECT: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MITCHELL'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE AREA JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Mobile Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds Mobile Symphony Inc ↗
  • Who funds JAGUAR ATHLETIC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA POLICY INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Senior Citizens Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds TEAM FOCUS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mayer & Arlene Mitchell Charitable FoundationAL28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mayer & Arlene Mitchell Charitable Foundation · The Ben May Charitable Trust Hancock Whitney Bank Successor Trustee · Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Cd Helen and Jeff Glaze Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Lisa Mitchell Charitable Foundation · Joy M & James Grodnick Charitable Founda Tion · Ws Foundation Inc Blacksher White-Spunner · Dog Hill Foundation · The Hyman Foundation · The Catranis Family Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Herbert a Meisler Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Herbert a Meisler Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Herbert a Meisler Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Herbert a Meisler Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Herbert a Meisler’s filings →

More from the funding graph