Skip to content

· Private foundation

Heramb Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$91kEducation$35kHealth$30kReligion$23kPhilanthropy$10kFood & Nutrition$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$497k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIA Cares Charitable Fndn$2,500
Navajo Evangelical Lutheran Mission$1,000
HRDC Griffin Place Holding Corp$1,000
San Diego Food Bank$1,000
Montana Food Bank Network$1,000
Evangelical Lutheran Church in Amer$1,000
Interfaith Shelter Network$500
Haven$500
Salvation Army$500
Miramar Nat'l Cemetary Fndn$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Human Resource Development Council: $700 → 10%Home of Guiding Hands: $35k → 11%Home of Guiding Hands: $25k → 11%Home of Guiding Hands: $9k → 11%Home of Guiding Hands: $5k → 11%Home of Guiding Hands: $5k → 11%Home of Guiding Hands: $5k → 11%Copley-Price Family YMCA: $250 → 11%Copley-Price Family YMCA: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$170k · 9 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$170k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+29%

Still filing today

56%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyReligionCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOME OF GUIDING HANDS CORPORATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $84k · revenue +74%
  • JC
    JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK
    3× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +149%
  • SI
    Soroptimist International of North San Diego
    3× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • SH
    Sharp Hospital Auxiliary
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • NL
    Navajo Lutheran Mission
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • LS
    Lutheran Social Services Southern C
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Door Opportunities

Feeding the homeless population in san d

Food & Nutrition
2
Crisis House

The mission of crisis house is to respond immediately to stop the cycle of domestic violence and homelessness and to connect families and individuals to crucial resources that empower them to renew their lives.

Human Services
3
Catholic Charities Diocese of San Diego

Catholic Charities provides social services and administers various governmental and social programs. Designed to meet the challenge of the ever-changing community by utilizing spiritual, human and financial resources, our programs enable…

Human Services
4
San Diego Hunger Coalition

San diego hunger coalition works collaboratively with community partners to create equitable access to food assistance through research, education, and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
5
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
6
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
7
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
8
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
9
Housing Help of San Diego

The specific purpose of Housing Help of San Diego (HHOSD) is to provide supportive services and tailored solutions with a goal of obtaining and maintaining affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
10
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
11
Neighborhood House Assn

Developing children, families, and future leaders of our communities through empowerment, education, and wellness from our house to yours. this is done by leading the way in developing confident, self-sufficient, healthy families and…

Human Services
12
The Food Depot

The food depot fosters healthy communities by engaging a network of partners and developing solutions to create a hunger-free new mexico.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding San Diego; the most unlike its peers is Navajo Evangelical Lutheran Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Sharp Memorial Hospital Auxiliary: $50,000 · OtherSharp Memorial Hospital AuxiliarySharp Hospital Auxiliary: $15,000 · OtherSharp Hospital AuxiliaryBIA Cares Charitable Fndn: $9,850 · OtherBIA Cares Charitable FndnEvangelical Lutheran Church in Amer: $9,500 · OtherEvangelical Lutheran Church in AmerNavajo Lutheran Mission: $5,000 · Other+15 more: $12,000 · Other+15 moreHOME OF GUIDING HANDS CORPORATION: $84,000 · Human ServicesHOME OF GUIDING HANDS CORPORATION+2 more: $1,200 · Human ServicesNavajo Evangelical Lutheran Mission Inc: $9,500 · ReligionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $4,000 · Food & NutritionMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $1,000 · Food & NutritionSoroptimist International of North San Diego: $1,950 · Crime & LegalHRDC GRIFFIN PLACE HOLDING CORPORTATION: $1,000 · Community ImprovementINDIVIDUAL & FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK: $500 · PhilanthropyTHE THURSDAY CLUB FOUNDATION: $175 · Philanthropy
Other$101,350Human Services$85,200Religion$9,500Food & Nutrition$6,000Crime & Legal$1,950Community Improvement$1,000Philanthropy$675

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOME OF GUIDING HANDS CORPORATION: $84,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNavajo Evangelical Lutheran Mission Inc: $9,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIVIDUAL & FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THURSDAY CLUB FOUNDATION: $175 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOME OF GUIDING HANDS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Navajo Evangelical Lutheran Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Soroptimist International of North San Diego ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds HRDC GRIFFIN PLACE HOLDING CORPORTATION ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN BORDER CONCERNS MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds INDIVIDUAL & FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE THURSDAY CLUB FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heramb Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heramb Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heramb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph