Skip to content

· Private foundation

Henry a Jubel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$9.9MAnimals$2.0MArts & Culture$265kScience & Tech$226kEnvironment$51kFood & Nutrition$50kRecreation & Sports$31kEmployment$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LOUIS ZOO$750,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES$616,543
MAGIC HOUSE$75,000
MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDENS$25,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERISTY OF ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES$15,000
THE CHILD CENTER OF NY$2,500
ST LOUIS ZOO$2,500
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOUNDATION FOR STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MO: $20k → 8%WESTMINSTER CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $10k → 11%HANNIBAL CAREER & TECHNICAL CENTER: $13k → 12%MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY STUDENT DESIGN LEARNING CENTER: $15k → 16%ST LOUIS ZOO: $750k → 21%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 23%FOUNDATION FOR STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MO: $19k → 8%HANNIBAL CAREER & TECHNICAL CENTER: $10k → 12%ST LOUIS ZOO: $750k → 21%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 23%FOUNDATION FOR STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MO: $10k → 8%ST LOUIS ZOO: $100k → 21%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 23%ST LOUIS ZOO: $100k → 21%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 23%ST LOUIS ZOO: $100k → 21%MAGIC HOUSE: $75k → 11%ST LOUIS ZOO: $100k → 21%MAGIC HOUSE: $75k → 11%ST LOUIS ZOO: $52k → 21%MAGIC HOUSE: $50k → 11%ST LOUIS ZOO: $50k → 21%MAGIC HOUSE: $25k → 11%MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDENS: $26k → 21%MAGIC HOUSE: $25k → 11%MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDENS: $25k → 21%MAGIC HOUSE: $15k → 11%MISSOURI BONTANICAL GARDENS: $25k → 21%MISSOURI BONTANICAL GARDENS: $25k → 21%ST LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER: $20k → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES: $1.3M → 11%ST LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER: $20k → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES: $1.3M → 11%ST LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER: $15k → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES: $1.3M → 11%ST LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER: $15k → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES: $1.3M → 11%ST LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER: $15k → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES: $1.3M → 11%ST LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER: $13k → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES: $1.3M → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES: $1.0M → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES: $625k → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES: $617k → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERISTY OF ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES: $15k → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERISTY OF ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES: $15k → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES: $15k → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 15 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$13M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+4%

Still filing today

40%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MAGIC HOUSE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $265k · revenue +77%
  • SI
    SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $70k · revenue +118%
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURI INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $49k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • ST
    STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURI
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • PM
    PHILANTHROPY MISSOURI
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +4%
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
2
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
3
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
7
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
8
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
9
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
10
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
11
University of Southern Mississippi Foundation

To build relationships with alumni and friends in order to secure private funds and other resources for the benefit of the university of southern mississippi (usm). the foundation receives, invests and distributes private gifts in support…

Education
12
Minnesota Institute for Talented Youth

Mity's mission is to inspire and challenge intellectually curious students to pursue their passions within a diverse, inclusive community and empower them by building skills and relationships for lifelong success.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philanthropy Missouri; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCES: $9,792,686 · OtherWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCESST LOUIS ZOO: $2,012,000 · OtherST LOUIS ZOO+10 more: $303,763 · OtherTHE MAGIC HOUSE: $265,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FOR STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURI INC: $48,500 · EducationWESTMINSTER CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $30,000 · EducationMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $50,515 · EnvironmentSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,750 · ReligionPHILANTHROPY MISSOURI: $3,354 · Philanthropy
Other$12,108,449Arts & Culture$265,000Education$148,500Environment$50,515Religion$3,750Philanthropy$3,354

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MAGIC HOUSE: $265,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $50,515 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURI INC: $48,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHILANTHROPY MISSOURI: $3,354 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MAGIC HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPY MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henry a Jubel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henry a Jubel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Henry a Jubel Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Henry a Jubel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Henry a Jubel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph