Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Helping Hand Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$916k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$188k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Human Services$590kHousing & Shelter$353kCommunity Improvement$247kFood & Nutrition$197kPhilanthropy$100kHealth$76kEducation$60kYouth Development$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $296k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $588k
$19,400
Median grant
2
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUIST BANK$188,000
UNITED WAY$100,000
FAMILY SERVICES OF UPPER OHIO VALLEY$75,750
HELPING HEROS$65,000
GREATER WHEELING COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$56,414
SEEING HAND ASSOCIATION$52,500
THE LIFE HUB$50,000
APPALACHIAN OUTREACH$46,000
HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER$44,045
SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING$43,500
BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING$40,000
OLD MAN RIVERS MISSION$25,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR THE MENTALLY ILL$22,500
YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM$19,400
COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC$17,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $602k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $15k → 19%BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING: $72k → 13%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $18k → 21%BROOKE HANCOCK FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $3k → 12%BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING: $40k → 13%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $17k → 21%BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING: $10k → 13%THE LIFE HUB INC: $100k → 15%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $5k → 21%COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $5k → 21%HELPING HEROS: $65k → 15%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH: $50k → 15%THE LIFE HUB: $50k → 15%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH: $46k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $44k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $19k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $13k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $12k → 15%OHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $11k → 15%OHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $5k → 15%OHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 15 repeat orgs$383k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$1.3M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
0%

Still filing today

73%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $338k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionEmploymentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $215k · revenue +3%
  • TG
    THE GREATER WHEELING COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $138k · revenue +19%
  • OM
    OLD MAN RIVERS MISSION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $47k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • WH
    WHEELING HOUSE AUTHORITY
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • JC
    JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $9k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southeastern Ohio Center for Independent Living

Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.

Human Services
2
Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc

Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.

Human Services
3
Holmes County Council On Aging Inc

To promote the physical, emotional, intellectual, and social well being of the senior citizens of holmes county, ohio through the delivery of supportive services such as meal and transportation programs thereby enhancing the quality of…

Human Services
4
Meals on Wheels of Hamilton County

Mowhc supports individuals who are elderly, disabled, and homebound by delivering nutritious meals, reducing hunger, improving health and promoting independence.

Food & Nutrition
5
Human Resources Center Inc

Services to challenged individuals in Vocational,Residential, Home Based, and Community settings.

Human Services
6
Jackson County Board On Aging Inc

To provide nutrition and meal services to jackson county ohio and to supply transportation services to senior citizens, the disabled, and others.

7
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
8
Cass County Community Living Inc

Housing/food - handicap

9
Stark County Council On Aging

Provide elderly services to allow persons to stay in their own homes

Human Services
10
House of Hope for Recovery Inc

Rehabilitation of adult alcoholics and drug addicts.

11
Human Development Commission

Our mission is restoring hope by helping people and changing lives.

Human Services
12
Christs Hands Inc

Organization operates a kitchen providing daily meals and housing opportunities serving harlan county and surrounding area. food boxes and personal items are also provided on a periodic basis.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Greater Wheeling Coalition for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is Life Hub Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
4/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRUIST BANK — $246,500 · OtherTRUIST BANKFAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC — $214,588 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INCTHE GREATER WHEELING COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $138,081 · OtherTHE GREATER WHEELING COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INCUNITED WAY — $100,000 · OtherUNITED WAYTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC — $88,500 · OtherTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC+17 more — $138,646 · Other+17 moreLIFE HUB INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesLIFE HUB INCBROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING — $122,000 · Human ServicesBROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGINGAPPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC — $96,225 · Human ServicesAPPALACHIAN OUTREACH INCHELPING HEROES INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HEROES INCCOMMUNITY RESOURCES INC — $45,045 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY RESOURCES INCYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC — $44,400 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INCTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC — $44,045 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC+3 more — $35,555 · Human Services+3 moreGROW OHIO VALLEY INC — $58,500 · Food & NutritionSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC — $52,500 · EmploymentOLD MAN RIVERS MISSION — $47,000 · Housing & ShelterCASA FOR CHILDREN INC — $12,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$926,315Human Services$602,270Food & Nutrition$58,500Employment$52,500Housing & Shelter$47,000Crime & Legal$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC — $214,588 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetLIFE HUB INC — $150,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetTHE GREATER WHEELING COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $138,081 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetBROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING — $122,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC — $96,225 over 2y, 23% of budgetTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC — $88,500 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetHELPING HEROES INC — $65,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetGROW OHIO VALLEY INC — $58,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC — $52,500 over 1y, 18% of budgetOLD MAN RIVERS MISSION — $47,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCES INC — $45,045 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC — $44,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC — $44,045 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetOHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK — $18,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $15,055 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCASA FOR CHILDREN INC — $12,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetBROOKE HANCOCK FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC
  • Who funds LIFE HUB INC
  • Who funds THE GREATER WHEELING COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC
  • Who funds BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC
  • Who funds THE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC
  • Who funds HELPING HEROES INC
  • Who funds GROW OHIO VALLEY INC
  • Who funds SEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds OLD MAN RIVERS MISSION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC
  • Who funds OHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK
  • Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds CASA FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds BROOKE HANCOCK FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley IncWV28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company · Hess Family Foundation · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · Vna Home Support Services Inc · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc · Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust · James B Chambers Memorial

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Helping Hand Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Helping Hand Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Helping Hand Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph