West Virginia · Nonprofit
BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING
BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING (West Virginia) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $129,531 to it, the largest being HELPING HAND FOUNDATION ($122,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 11,253 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,253 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- John C Williams Charitable Tr 8024shared funders
- Bbch Community Partnersportfolio match
- Northeast Missouri Area Agency on Agingportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 65% · 2018 71% · 2019 62% · 2020 71% · 2021 78% · 2022 74% · 2023 77% · 2024 75%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
85% of BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $5k → $72k.
1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
Left out of every figure on this page: $104k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc). These are real filings, and they are not money BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING raised.
From the IRS filings of BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING leans on a few funders — its largest provides 94% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING's grant income comes from West Virginia funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $31 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- John C Williams Charitable Tr 8024shared fundersPA · backs 14 organizations that share your funders
- Bbch Community Partnersportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Northeast Missouri Area Agency on Agingportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Cicoa Aging & In-Home Solutions Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Umrc-Porter Hills Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ageguide Northeastern Illinois Area on Agingportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Pierce Katharine C Uwportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- IAAAA Education Institute Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Western Illinois Area Agency on Agingportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Area Agency on Aging for North Floridaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- East Central Il Area Agency on Aging Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ten County Aging Board Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Government funding BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $838k on record.
- Corporation for National and Community Service$838k
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In West Virginia
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
97% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING?
- BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING (West Virginia) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $129,531 to it, the largest being HELPING HAND FOUNDATION ($122,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $129,531 in grants to BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING?
- HELPING HAND FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $122,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like BROOKE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in West Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing