Skip to content

· Private foundation

Helmsmanshipinc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Environment$55kHealth$53kEducation$42kHuman Services$41kArts & Culture$39kRecreation & Sports$33kFood & Nutrition$27kPublic Benefit$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$3,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$564k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OCEANS VOYAGE INSTITUTE$10,000
1130 NAUTICAL DONATIONS$10,000
SE SIDE EXP INCUBATOR$8,750
VAR MISC ORGANIZED CHARITIES$6,105
MOUNT CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
WIREPOINTS$5,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$4,000
SALVATION ARMY$4,000
ST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL$3,500
ST PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,500
CHICAGO POLICE SAILING ASSOC$3,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHICAGO RIVER$3,000
CHICAGO TRAINING CENTER$3,000
MEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO$2,500
CANAL CORRIDOR ASSOCIATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOUTH CHICAGO PARENTS AND FRIENDS: $3k → 14%SOUTH CHICAGO PARENTS AND FRIENDS: $2k → 14%SOUTH CHICAGO PARENTS AND FRIENDS: $2k → 14%SOUTH CHICAGO PARENTS AND FRIENDS: $2k → 14%SOUTH CHICAGO PARENTS & FRIENDS: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$287k · 27 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
17

Total granted

$287k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
+12%

Still filing today

59%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHealthFood & NutritionPublic BenefitEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OV
    Ocean Voyages Institute
    4× · 2019–2024 · $25k · revenue +27%
  • CY
    CHICAGO YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $15k · revenue +287%
  • WC
    WIREPOINTS CORP
    5× · 2019–2024 · $11k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +12%
  • CA
    CONSTANCE ABBEY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • SA
    ST ANN CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Yacht Club

Chicago yacht club's mission is to encourage and promote the comingling of members through yachting by providing recreation activities, classes and regattas for members and their guests.

—
2
Chicago Parks Foundation

The Chicago Parks Foundation is a separate 501 (c) (3) non-profit organization that also serves as the strategic partner for the coordination of fundraising and charitable resources for the Chicago Park District.

Recreation & Sports
3
Chicago Rowing Foundation

To promote foster and support both sweep rowing and sculling to youth and adults in the Greater Chicago Metropolitan Area and to educate coach and train the general public in skills relating to rowing and in-water safety.

—
4
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
5
Sail Chicago

Sailing instruction

Recreation & Sports
6
Chicago's Environmental Fund
—
7
Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce

The chicagoland chamber of commerce combines the power of people, with our legacy of leadership and business advocacy, to drive a dynamic economy. we focus on delivering value for our members, making chicagoland a world-class place to live…

—
8
Chicago Convention and Tourism Bureau

The chicago convention and tourism bureau is the premier sales and marketing organization that promotes chicago's world-class assets to global leisure travel and convention business to ensure the economic vitality of the city and its…

—
9
The Chicago Club

The chicago club is and shall continue to be the premier club in the city of chicago, serving the business, civic, educational, and philanthropic leaders, and their families, by providing a private club with outstanding dining, service,…

—
10
Chicago Votes

Chicago Votes is a non-partisan, non-profit organization building a more inclusive democracy by putting power in the hands of young Chicagoans. We're engaging and developing a new generation of leaders by opening the doors of government,…

Civil Rights
11
Students Run Chicago
Health
12
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the Chicago River; the most unlike its peers is Ocean Voyages Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/28
Grantees still filing
13/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Ocean Voyages Institute: $25,000 · OtherOcean Voyages InstituteST PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH: $23,500 · OtherST PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCHCHICAGO MARITIME ARTS CENTER: $21,000 · OtherCHICAGO MARITIME ARTS CENTERCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CHICAGO: $19,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CHICAGOCHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUM: $18,000 · OtherCHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUMSALVATION ARMY: $16,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYCANAL CORRIDOR ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · OtherCANAL CORRIDOR ASSOCIATIONHOOVER INSTITUTE: $12,000 · Other1130 NAUTICAL DONATIONS: $10,000 · OtherPRAGER U FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherSE SIDE EXP INCUBATOR: $8,750 · Other+22 more: $67,370 · Other+22 moreGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO: $11,750 · Food & NutritionCHICAGO YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $14,800 · Recreation & SportsChicago Training Center: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsGeorge Pocock Rowing Foundation: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsJACKSON PARK YACHT CLUB: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF THE PARKS: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $500 · Recreation & SportsRECOVERY ON WATER INC: $7,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,500 · HealthROSELAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthWIREPOINTS CORP: $10,750 · Public BenefitArmed Forces Council of Chicago: $500 · Public BenefitPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · Education+1 more: $50 · EducationSOUTH CHICAGO PARENTS & FRIENDS INC: $9,250 · Human Services
Other$245,620Food & Nutrition$26,750Recreation & Sports$25,800Health$13,500Public Benefit$11,250Education$11,050Human Services$9,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOcean Voyages Institute: $25,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCHICAGO MARITIME ARTS CENTER: $21,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetCHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUM: $18,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCANAL CORRIDOR ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCHICAGO YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $14,800 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO: $11,750 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWIREPOINTS CORP: $10,750 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH CHICAGO PARENTS & FRIENDS INC: $9,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRECOVERY ON WATER INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHICAGO RIVER: $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRESPIRATORY HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Training Center: $6,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONSTANCE ABBEY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetGeorge Pocock Rowing Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PARKS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSELAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetArmed Forces Council of Chicago: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHANGE ILLINOIS: $405 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ocean Voyages Institute ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO MARITIME ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds CANAL CORRIDOR ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds WIREPOINTS CORP ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CHICAGO PARENTS & FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds RECOVERY ON WATER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHICAGO RIVER ↗
  • Who funds RESPIRATORY HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Training Center ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSTANCE ABBEY INC ↗
  • Who funds George Pocock Rowing Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON PARK YACHT CLUB ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PARKS ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NAVY LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dr Scholl FoundationIL19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dr Scholl Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Stone Barrett Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Canning Foundation · The Joyce Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Tides Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Helmsmanshipinc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helmsmanshipinc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Helmsmanshipinc?

    Find your warmest path to Helmsmanshipinc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Helmsmanshipinc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph