Skip to content

· Private foundation

Helen Graham Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$222k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$935kHealth$458kArts & Culture$208kCommunity Improvement$110kInternational$60kScience & Tech$50kPhilanthropy$14kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PERC$50,000
OUTWARD BOUND$45,000
INST FOR NEURO DISORDERS (IND)$40,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$25,000
JACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY$15,000
PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
HOLLINS UNIVERSITY$10,000
BRIDGES TO COMMUNITY$10,000
MCV FOUNDATION$5,000
THE READING TEAM$5,000
VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,500
WOMEN'S GIVING ALLIANCE$1,500
HOPE'S DOOR$1,000
READ TO GROW$1,000
MYFACE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE READING TEAM: $5k → 17%THE READING TEAM: $5k → 17%THE READING TEAM: $5k → 17%THE READING TEAM: $5k → 17%THE READING TEAM: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
NY
PA
CT
CA
VA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Helen Graham Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 13% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 11%.

Helen Graham Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 21 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
2

Total granted

$1.9M
$60k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BRIDGES TO COMMUNITY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +0%
  • PM
    PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART
    9× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +14%
  • VH
    VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • I
    IND
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
2
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
3
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
4
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
5
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
6
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
7
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
8
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
11
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teach for America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Philadelphia Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PERC: $455,000 · OtherPERCINST FOR NEURO DISORDERS (IND): $380,000 · OtherINST FOR NEURO DISORDERS (IND)OUTWARD BOUND: $310,000 · OtherOUTWARD BOUNDBRIDGES TO COMMUNITY INC: $110,000 · OtherBRIDGES TO COMMUNITY INCJACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY: $56,000 · OtherIND: $50,000 · Other+8 more: $43,500 · OtherHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $140,000 · EducationHOLLINS UNIVERSITY …Teach for America Inc: $112,500 · EducationTeach for America I…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $47,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIF…MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $27,000 · EducationMEDICAL COLLEGE OF …+1 more: $5,000 · EducationPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $107,000 · Arts & CultureVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $40,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FUND INC: $50,000 · InternationalREADING TEAM INC: $22,000 · Human Services
Other$1,404,500Education$331,500Arts & Culture$147,000International$50,000Human Services$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $140,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $112,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGES TO COMMUNITY INC: $110,000 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $107,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FUND INC: $50,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $47,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $40,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREADING TEAM INC: $22,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF HISTORIC KINGSTON: $5,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetREAD TO GROW INC: $5,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHOPES DOOR INC: $5,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TO COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds READING TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HISTORIC KINGSTON ↗
  • Who funds READ TO GROW INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPES DOOR INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Helen Graham Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helen Graham Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Helen Graham Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Helen Graham Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Helen Graham’s filings →

    More from the funding graph