Skip to content

· Private foundation

Held Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$154k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$142kPhilanthropy$121kInternational$92kReligion$62kCrime & Legal$42kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kEducation$10kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $128k
$7,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$59k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$27,500
ABIDE CENTER$23,000
CHRISTIAN INTERNATIONAL$15,000
YWAM SLAVIC MINISTRIES$15,000
LIGHTS OF HOPE FOUNDATION$14,400
OMAHA RAPID RESPONSE$12,000
Individual grant recipient$11,000
WESTSIDE CHURCH$10,000
SANJIVANI UNIVERSITY$7,500
MOUNT ABARIM BAPTIST MISSION$6,000
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA$3,123
SKUTT CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$2,800
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ELKHORN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION$2,225
THE NAVIGATORS$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 68% of grant dollars ($361k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 32% that went abroad ($168k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%OMAHA RAPID RESPONSE: $13k → 12%OMAHA RAPID RESPONSE: $12k → 12%OMAHA RAPID RESPONSE: $12k → 12%OMAHA RAPID RESPONSE: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
NY
OR
IN
CO
NE
TN
NC
MS
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 32% of all-years giving ($168k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$84k · 5 grants
Dominican Republic$62k · 4 grants
Panama$22k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$449k · 12 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$449k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+26%

Still filing today

33%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionYouth DevelopmentInternationalHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ABIDE CENTER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $142k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2020–2024 · $76k
  • CI
    CHRISTIAN INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $62k

Funded once

  • BM
    BAPTIST MEDICAL & DENTAL MISSION INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +34%
  • HO
    HOUSE ON THE ROCK
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eyewitness Missions
Philanthropy
2
Bible Mission Global

Bible mission's purpose and vision is to win people for christ through cooperation and partnership of local churches. bmg strategically serves with, and through the local churches. our purpose is to help the local churches (through…

Religion
3
Hope Outreach International Ministries

Evangelizing the lost through gospel crusades, camps and conferences; Empowering orphans and widows and those in need through Christ-centered vocational training; and Equipping ministers of the gospel through Christian seminars and…

Religion
4
Impact Ministries with the Michalski

Christian Mission in Russia, Eastern Europe, Central Asia to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ via crusades, to plant Christian churches, to train local pastors/ministers and to distribute the Bible. In addition, to provide humanitarian…

International
5
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
6
Salt With a Mission

Teach the ministry of christ

Religion
7
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
8
Kingdom of God Ministry

We are a Christian organization. The mission of this ministry is to preach the Gospel to all nations through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, declare God's glory among the nations and His marvelous deeds.

—
9
Rejoice Ministries International

RMI provides pastoral care ministry and support globally, with conferences, seminars, retreats, meetings and individual counseling.

Civil Rights
10
Bible Open Air Mission

Purpose is sending individuals around the world to win souls to jesus christ by preaching the gospel evangelism.

Religion
11
Awakening Lives to World Missions

Awakening Lives to World Missions (ALWM) International carries out ongoing, fruitful, life changing ministry in Bangladesh, Belarus, Cambodia, Kenya, Laos, Myanmar, Tanzania, Thailand & Vietnam through our ministry partners, missionaries…

Religion
12
Silk Wave Mission

SWM Mission is an abbreviation for Silk Wave Mission, and is an organization that serves as a united prayer movement, church planting movement, and missionary church movement for spiritual recovery and revival in Turkey and the Islamic…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baptist Medical & Dental Mission International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rapid Response Omahas Disaster Relief Team. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ABIDE CENTER: $142,100 · OtherABIDE CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $76,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRISTIAN INTERNATIONAL: $62,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $27,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIGLESIA BAUTISTA BIBLICA DE DAVID - CASA HOGAR: $22,000 · OtherIGLESIA BAUTISTA BIBLICA DE DAVID - CASA HOGAR+14 more: $40,678 · Other+14 moreLights of Hope Foundation: $42,000 · ReligionLights of …MOUNT ABARIM BAPTIST MISSIONS: $6,000 · ReligionMOUNT ABAR…+2 more: $1,300 · ReligionRAPID RESPONSE OMAHAS DISASTER RELIEF TEAM: $39,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH WITH A MISSION-SLAVIC MINISTRIES: $15,000 · InternationalBAPTIST MEDICAL & DENTAL MISSION INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · InternationalHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Glow Mission: $500 · Youth DevelopmentELKHORN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $2,975 · Recreation & Sports
Other$405,278Religion$49,300Human Services$39,500International$25,000Youth Development$6,500Recreation & Sports$2,975

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAPID RESPONSE OMAHAS DISASTER RELIEF TEAM: $39,500 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetYOUTH WITH A MISSION-SLAVIC MINISTRIES: $15,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetBAPTIST MEDICAL & DENTAL MISSION INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT ABARIM BAPTIST MISSIONS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetELKHORN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $2,975 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCBMC INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Glow Mission: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lights of Hope Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RAPID RESPONSE OMAHAS DISASTER RELIEF TEAM ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION-SLAVIC MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST MEDICAL & DENTAL MISSION INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT ABARIM BAPTIST MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds ELKHORN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CBMC INC ↗
  • Who funds The Glow Mission ↗
  • Who funds SOW THE LOVE MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Held Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Held Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Held Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph