· Private foundation
Heinemannmark & Judy Foundation-Im
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $341k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $215k
- $250k+1 grant · $340k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FOUND | $340,000 |
| MISSION TO THE WORLD PCA INC | $77,500 |
| 1826 NETWORK | $76,000 |
| CLEMSON UNIVERSITY | $61,141 |
| PCA REFORMED UNIVERSITY MINISTERIES | $44,000 |
| OUTREACH FOUNDATION OF THE | $42,000 |
| THIRD MILLENIUM MINISTERIES INC | $35,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA | $32,467 |
| JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY | $23,429 |
| PAUL MITCHELL THE SCHOOL CHARLOTTE | $22,650 |
| TEAM | $22,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INC | $22,000 |
| EQUIPPING LEADERS INTERNATIONAL INC | $18,000 |
| TRUTH XCHANGE | $17,000 |
| CHRISTIAN STRONGHOLD BAPTIST CHURCH | $11,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
51 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TITRUTHXCHANGE INC6× · 2019–2024 · $277k · revenue +11% · 29% of their budget
- TMTHIRD MILLENNIUM MINISTRIES INC5× · 2020–2024 · $140k · revenue +49%
- NCNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC2× · 2019–2021 · $135k · revenue ×103
Funded once
- MTMISSION TO THE WORLDone grant, 2019 · $152k
- FMFRIENDSHIP MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $101k
- FMFRIENDSHIP MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCone grant, 2020 · $62k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.
Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…
North greenville university exists to glorify god by cultivating graduates who are equipped to serve as transformational leaders for church and society.
Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.
Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.
Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.
East texas baptist university (etbu) was founded in 1912 as a fully accredited institution of higher education. affiliated with the baptist general convention of texas, etbu educates students by integrating biblical faith and learning to…
Northeastern seminary strives to be a vibrant source for christian theological formation whose students are formed in a biblical vision of gracious christianity and impact wholeness to the world in an expansive array of vocations and…
Pacific school of religion prepares a diverse cadre of spiritually rooted leaders with the vision, resilience, and skill to create a world where all can thrive. grounded in the rigorous study and faithful practice of progressive christian…
Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.
North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…
Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fuller Theological Seminary and the most unlike its peers is Global Faith Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
- Who funds The 1826 NETWORK ↗
- Who funds TRUTHXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds THIRD MILLENNIUM MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Creighton University ↗
- Who funds THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc ↗
- Who funds Equipping Leaders International Inc ↗
- Who funds JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CAIRN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN BIBLE COLLEGES INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Savannah College of Art and DesignInc ↗
- Who funds POWER CROSS ↗
- Who funds COVENANT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ENTRUST ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SERGE GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds PRINCETON CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Dallas Seminary Foundation · South Carolina Christian Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Hugh and Charlotte Maclellan Charitable Charitable Trust · Tyndale House Ministries
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Heinemannmark & Judy Foundation-Im funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Heinemannmark & Judy Foundation-Im?
Find your warmest path to Heinemannmark & Judy Foundation-Im through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.