Skip to content

· Private foundation

Heilicher Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$454k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$195k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.5MEducation$749kReligion$411kArts & Culture$173kHousing & Shelter$41kRecreation & Sports$18kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $320k
$22,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION$195,000
SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY$125,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
TALMUD TORAH$25,000
JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY$22,000
MINNESOTA HILLEL$20,000
JEWFOLK MEDIA INC$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $260k → 11%WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE: $10k → 14%MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $195k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $180k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $160k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $160k → 11%MOISHE HOUSE: $10k → 11%HEILICHER MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $130k → 11%SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY: $125k → 11%HEILICHER MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $115k → 11%HEILICHER MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $90k → 11%HEILICHER MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $80k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $58k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $55k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $52k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $44k → 11%SABES JCC: $40k → 11%JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $37k → 11%SABES JCC: $30k → 11%SABES JCC: $30k → 11%SABES JCC: $30k → 11%SABES JCC: $30k → 11%TALMUD TORAH: $25k → 11%TALMUD TORAH: $25k → 11%TALMUD TORAH: $25k → 11%SABES JCC: $25k → 11%SABES JCC: $25k → 11%TALMUD TORAH: $25k → 11%SABES JCC: $25k → 11%TALMUD TORAH: $25k → 11%SABES JCC: $25k → 11%JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $22k → 11%TALMUD TORAH: $20k → 11%TALMUD TORAH: $20k → 11%TALMUD TORAH: $20k → 11%TALMUD TORAH: $20k → 11%JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $17k → 11%JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $16k → 11%JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $16k → 11%JEWFOLK MEDIA INC: $15k → 11%JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $11k → 11%JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $11k → 11%JEWFOLK MEDIA INC: $10k → 11%JEWFOLK MEDIA INC: $10k → 11%JEWFOLK MEDIA INC: $10k → 11%HERZL CAMP: $10k → 11%JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 11%MINNESOTA HILLEL: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 14 repeat orgs$165k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$1.5M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+23%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $624k · revenue +169%
  • JH
    JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE UPPER MIDWEST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $150k · revenue +34%
  • MH
    MINNESOTA HILLEL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • WB
    WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • Y
    YOURJEWISH
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • HC
    HERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
2
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc
Youth Development
5
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
6
Hillel Foundation at Miami University

Hillel at Miami University, the center of Jewish life on campus, seeks to engage, connect, and empower students to explore their Jewish identity creating a vibrant Jewish community and inspiring the next generation of Jewish leaders.

—
7
The University of Iowa Louis Shulman Hillel Foundation

The mission of Iowa Hillel is to enhance the lives of Jewish students at the University of Iowa, so they may enrich the Jewish people and the world. Iowa Hillel envisions a world for our students where they find a community here at Iowa…

—
8
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

—
9
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
10
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
11
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
12
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minneapolis Jewish Federation; the most unlike its peers is The Institute for Holocaust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY: $624,176 · OtherHAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $260,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTALMUD TORAH: $205,000 · OtherTALMUD TORAHJEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE UPPER MIDWEST: $150,000 · OtherJEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE UPPER MIDWESTSMITH JEWISH ACADEMY: $125,000 · OtherSMITH JEWISH ACADEMYMINNESOTA HILLEL: $85,600 · OtherMINNESOTA HILLEL+8 more: $104,000 · Other+8 moreMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $1,503,000 · PhilanthropyMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATIONJEWFOLK MEDIA INC: $85,000 · ReligionHERZL CAMP FOUNDATION: $18,000 · ReligionMOISHE HOUSE: $15,000 · ReligionThe Institute for Holocaust: $20,000 · Arts & CultureHERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,553,776Philanthropy$1,503,000Religion$118,000Arts & Culture$20,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $1,503,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetHAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY: $624,176 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetJEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE UPPER MIDWEST: $150,000 over 9y, 18% of budgetMINNESOTA HILLEL: $85,600 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetJEWFOLK MEDIA INC: $85,000 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetThe Institute for Holocaust: $20,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHERZL CAMP FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds HAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE UPPER MIDWEST ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds JEWFOLK MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Institute for Holocaust ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS ↗
  • Who funds HERZL CAMP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOISHE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN20.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Tankenoff Families Foundation · Mike & Linda Fiterman Family Foundation · Baratz Family Foundation Inc · Marshall & Elaine Siegel Foundation · The Beverly Foundation · The Z S & M Wilf Foundation Inc · The Jay and Rose Phillips Family Foundation of Minnesota · American Endowment Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heilicher Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heilicher Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heilicher’s filings →

    More from the funding graph