How much does Heartland Regional Medical Center give?

Heartland Regional Medical Center reported 35 itemized grants totaling $2,316,972, out of $2,773,892 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 18 and 28 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does Heartland Regional Medical Center fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (76%), Education (12%), Human Services (2%).

Who are Heartland Regional Medical Center's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Mosaic Medical Center Maryville ($26M), Mosaic Health System ($18M), Heartland Foundation ($7.1M).

Does Heartland Regional Medical Center fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Heartland Regional Medical Center?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Community Foundation of Northwest Missouriinc, Commerce Bancshares Foundation, Harold P Dugdale Charitable Trust.

Where is Heartland Regional Medical Center based?

Heartland Regional Medical Center is based in MO.

Heartland Regional Medical Center

Heartland Regional Medical Center at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Heartland Regional Medical Center

To put the needs of the patient first by empowering a culture where caregivers bring their best, ensuring a healthier future for generations to come.

$2.8M

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$421k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$53MEducation$8.1MHuman Services$1.7MHousing & Shelter$1.5MPhilanthropy$1.4MCommunity Improvement$977kEmployment$872kFood & Nutrition$778kOther$0

02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 35 grants below total $2,316,972, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,773,892 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $456,920 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k8 grants · $44k
$10k–50k11 grants · $245k
$50k–250k14 grants · $1.4M
$250k+2 grants · $676k

$35,000

Median grant

States reached

$582M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
Heartland Foundation	$421,116
YMCA of St Joseph Missouri	$255,000
Samaritan Counseling Center Inc	$210,000
United Way of Greater St Joseph	$152,380
Second Harvest Community Food Bank	$150,500
Social Welfare Board	$150,000
YWCA of St Joseph Missouri	$102,400
North Central Missouri College Foundation	$100,000
St Joseph Area Chamber of Commerce	$97,075
Community Missions Corporation	$61,715
Albrecht-Kemper Museum of Art Foundations	$60,500
Ashland United Methodist Church	$58,300
Northwest Missouri Childrens Advocacy Center	$56,500
Habitat for Humanity	$53,000
Pivotal Point	$50,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$18M · 43 repeat orgs$51M to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$18M

$51M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%

+31%

Still filing today

81%

63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $259k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HF
Heartland Foundation
9× · 2017–2025 · $7.1M · revenue +367% · 55% of their budget
MW
MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +53%
UW
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST JOSEPH
7× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +2%

Funded once

MM
Mosaic Medical Center Maryvillegraduated
one grant, 2019 · $26M · revenue +156% · 66% of their budget
MH
Mosaic Health Systemgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $18M · revenue +235% · 100% of their budget
NM
Northwest Medical Center Association Inc
one grant, 2019 · $6.7M · revenue +12% · 27% of their budget

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Northland Health Care Access

Operating an integrated community health system providing access to health care for the uninsured low income residents of three counties in Missouri

Health

Missouri Jobs With Justice

Educate the community on workers' rights

Employment

Heartland Regional Medical Center

To put the needs of the patient first by empowering a culture where caregivers bring their best, ensuring a healthier future for generations to come.

Health

Community Clinic of Southwest Missouri

The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.

—

Labette County Medical Center

We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.

Health

Missouri Center for Patient Safety

Center for patient safety seeks to reduce preventable patient harm by improving patient safety culture, working in collaboration with providers, associations and government entities.

Health

Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health

Stl Care Company

The mission of stl care company is to improve public health services designed to prevent and reduce sickness, produce positive health, provide quality nursing home care, encourage proactive use of health and medical resources, acquire…

Health

Jefferson Community Health Center Inc

Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.

Health

Missoula Area Chamber of Commerce

An association providing community leadership and business advocacy sustaining economic vitality.

—

Clark Community Mental Health Center

Reduce the stigma and promote awareness surrounding mental health within the communities we serve, promote wellness, and provide individualized care with an integrated approach.

Health

Missouri Jobs With Justice Voter Action

To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, ballot initiatives, and government programs as a voice of the working class, to promote social justice, and to stimulate the economy; and, to conduct research, educate the public, and…

Civil Rights

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

51/51

Grantees still filing

41/51

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Health$51,802,221Other$12,608,943Human Services$1,650,582Housing & Shelter$1,495,649Philanthropy$1,356,899Education$580,000Crime & Legal$278,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Northwest MissouriincMO38.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Northwest Missouriinc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Harold P Dugdale Charitable Trust · United Way of Greater St Joseph · Wm and Margaret Schreiber Char Tr · Harry and Helena Messick Charitable Tr · The Depriest Family Foundation Inc · The Sunderland Foundation · Norma J and William J Kenney Charitable · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The Moya Family Foundation · Helen N Poston Charitable Trust

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heartland Regional Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heartland Regional Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Heartland Regional Medical Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home