Skip to content
Heart to Heart Hospice Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Heart to Heart Hospice Foundation

Assistance with hospice expenses for terminal patients.

$445k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$432kArts & Culture$93kEducation$67kPhilanthropy$52kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kFood & Nutrition$10kHuman Services$10kYouth Development$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $190,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $444,906 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $254,406 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $131k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$30,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH TEXAS ALZHEIMERS PRO-AM INC$60,000
GROUND ZERO EMERGENCY TRAINING CENTER$35,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$30,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$30,000
CORNWALL HEALTH FOUNDATION SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN$25,000
THE SALVATION ARMY OF NORTH TEXAS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MEALS ON WHEELS SENIOR SERVICES: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$413k · 6 repeat orgs$263k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
15

Total granted

$413k
$193k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+43%

Still filing today

100%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic BenefitAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $141k · revenue +32%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    4× · 2018–2024 · $106k · revenue +26%
  • TJ
    TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $25k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • NP
    NATIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $55k
  • DP
    DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +45%
  • UC
    URBAN COMMUNICATIONS GROUPgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
2
University of Southern Mississippi Foundation

To build relationships with alumni and friends in order to secure private funds and other resources for the benefit of the university of southern mississippi (usm). the foundation receives, invests and distributes private gifts in support…

Education
3
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
4
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
5
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
6
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
7
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
10
Indiana University Foundation

The Indiana University Foundation (IUF) maximizes private philanthropic support for Indiana University by fostering lifelong relationships with key stakeholders and providing advancement leadership and fundraising services for (Continued…

Education
11
Miami University Foundation

Support of miami university

Education
12
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wayne State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $140,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INCNORTH TEXAS ALZHEIMERS PRO-AM INC: $120,000 · HealthNORTH TEXAS ALZHEIMERS PRO-AM INCAmerican Heart Association Inc: $106,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATIONNATIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA LLC: $55,493 · OtherNATIONAL PUBLIC ME…URBAN COMMUNICATIONS GROUP: $25,000 · OtherURBAN COMMUNICATIO…THE SALVATION ARMY NORTH TEXAS AREA COMMAND: $10,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY…WORKFORCE TALENT EDUCATORS ASSOCIAT: $7,500 · OtherWORKFORCE TALENT E…SMITH COUNTY ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD: $5,000 · OtherILITCH CHARITIES INC: $8,900 · OtherILITCH CHARITIES I…Wreaths Across America: $8,500 · OtherWreaths Across Ame…TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationTYLER JUNIO…Madonna University: $11,500 · EducationMadonna Uni…GRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationGRAYSON COU…WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationWAYNE STATE…LANSING COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationLANSING COM…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …UNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …UNIVERSITY OF SAINT FRANCIS OF FORT WAYNE INDIANA INC: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …THE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $52,000 · PhilanthropyDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $30,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $7,720 · Arts & CultureGROUND ZERO EMERGENCY TRAINING CENTER FOUNDATION: $35,000 · AnimalsMEALS ON WHEELS SENIOR SERVICES: $10,000 · Human ServicesTARRANT AREA GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 · Human Services
Health$391,500Other$120,393Education$76,500Philanthropy$52,000Arts & Culture$37,720Animals$35,000Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $140,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS ALZHEIMERS PRO-AM INC: $120,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $106,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $52,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGROUND ZERO EMERGENCY TRAINING CENTER FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMadonna University: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS SENIOR SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILITCH CHARITIES INC: $8,900 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWreaths Across America: $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $7,720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORKFORCE TALENT EDUCATORS ASSOCIAT: $7,500 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetLANSING COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTARRANT AREA GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAINT FRANCIS OF FORT WAYNE INDIANA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments Fou…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Texas Instruments FoundationTX11.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heart to Heart Hospice Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heart to Heart Hospice Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Heart to Heart Hospice Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Heart to Heart Hospice Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heart to Heart Hospice’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home