Skip to content
Healy Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Healy Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$25kHousing & Shelter$8kHealth$8kFood & Nutrition$6kYouth Development$4kPhilanthropy$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$193k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL$2,000
THE HERREN PROJECT$2,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$1,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
SML GOOD NEIGHBORS$500
COTS$500
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY HOCKEY ASSOC$500
VERMONT FOOD BANK$500
SOUTH BURLINGTON FOODSHELF$500
VERMONT CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$250
HUNGER FREE VERMONT$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 10%SML GOOD NEIGHBORS: $500 → 8%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 10%SML GOOD NEIGHBORS: $500 → 8%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 10%SML GOOD NEIGHBORS: $500 → 8%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 10%SML GOOD NEIGHBORS: $500 → 8%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 10%SML GOOD NEIGHBORS: $500 → 8%SML GOOD NEIGHBORS: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 15 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
21

Total granted

$40k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+43%

Still filing today

73%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $12k · revenue +98%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +39%
  • SG
    SML GOOD NEIGHBORS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VT - COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
2
Spoonfuls

Spoonfuls is an organization that facilitates the recovery and distribution of healthy, perishable food that would otherwise be discarded. spoonfuls works efficiently to deliver this food directly to the community organizations and…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
4
Vermont Council On World Affairs Inc

See schedule othe mission of the vermont council on world affairs is to promote awareness and understanding of the world and its people, places and cultures through education and engagement. the future of vermont depends upon the world…

—
5
Connecticut Foodshare Inc

The mission of the connecticut foodshare is to deliver an informed and equitable response to hunger by mobilizing community partners, volunteers, and supporters.

—
6
Feeding Westchester Inc

Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.

—
7
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
8
Willing Hands Enterprises Inc

Willing hands delivers fresh food to more than 80 social service organizations throughout the upper valley of new hampshire and vermont that serve as food access points to our community. fresh food is recovered from local farms, grocery…

Human Services
9
Fair Food Network Inc

Fair food network is organized to grow community health, wealth, and resilience through food, to increase access to affordable healthy food, help local food economies thrive and build resilience in local food and agriculture systems.

Food & Nutrition
10
Vermont Network Against Domestic an Sexual Violence Inc

The vermont network aims to uproot the causes of domestic and sexual violence in vermont and create a world free of oppression where actions, beliefs and systems support all people to thrive. we accomplish this through our key programs…

Human Services
11
Our Neighbors' Table Inc

The Organization is committed to establishing a community that provides for the whole person with nourishing food, kindness and dignity. The Organization provides food directly to those experiencing food insecurity while also directing the…

Human Services
12
Veap Inc

VEAP is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, multi-service, human service organization with the mission of "Together, we create pathways to stronger, more hopeful, communities through access to healthy food, housing stability and supportive services."

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Passage Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Fumbelo Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATION: $2,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATIONSOUTH BURLINGTON FOODSHELF: $2,000 · OtherSOUTH BURLINGTON FOODSHELFFAMILY PROMISE: $2,000 · OtherFAMILY PROMISEUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VT - COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $2,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VT - COMMUNITY PAR…VERMONT CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,750 · OtherVERMONT CHILDREN'S HOSPITALWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $1,250 · OtherWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INCUNHCR - UKRAINE: $1,000 · OtherCOTS: $1,000 · OtherWELLSLEY VILLAGE CHURCH: $1,000 · OtherSAFE PASSAGE INC: $1,000 · OtherTHE BARKA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · OtherHUNGER FREE VERMONT INC: $750 · Other+12 more: $5,750 · Other+12 moreCOMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $11,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNAT…SML GOOD NEIGHBORS INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesSML GOOD NEIGHBORS INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN IN…Save The Children Federation Inc: $2,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federa…FRIENDS OF FUMBELO INC: $1,250 · InternationalFRIENDS OF FUMBELO INCTHE HERREN PROJECT: $3,000 · HealthSTERN CENTER FOR LANGUAGE AND LEARNING: $500 · HealthCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $1,500 · Housing & ShelterROSIE'S PLACE INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterANEW PLACE INC: $750 · Housing & ShelterVERMONT FOODBANK: $2,000 · Food & NutritionTHE NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM INC: $100 · Food & NutritionSPARK KINDNESS INC: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$22,500Human Services$14,500International$12,750Health$3,500Housing & Shelter$3,250Food & Nutrition$2,100Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSML GOOD NEIGHBORS INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HERREN PROJECT: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPARK KINDNESS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BARKA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSAFE PASSAGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER FREE VERMONT INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANEW PLACE INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA Place To Turn Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation for MetroWest Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTERN CENTER FOR LANGUAGE AND LEARNING: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community…The Pfizer Foundation…The Ayco Charitable F…Verizon FoundationPaypal Charitable Giv…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…
The Vermont Community FoundationVT13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Healy Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Healy Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Safe Passage Inc: 55% of income from government
  • Committee On Temporary Shelter Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Hunger Free Vermont Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Spark Kindness Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Stern Center for Language and Learning: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Healy Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Healy Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Healy’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home