Skip to content

· Public charity

Healthnetwork Foundation Fka Health Net Foundation Inc

Connecting members with the leading healthcare providers to make the best medical care available for their needs and to make donations thru our partner hospitals to our doctors to fund education and research improving medicine for all.

$7.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$4.2M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.6MEducation$30kEmployment$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k17 grants · $455k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $380k
  • $250k+4 grants · $6.4M
$35,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$86M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS GRANTS UNDER 5000 PER$4,233,881
JOHN HOPKINS$1,360,000
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS$400,001
CLEVELAND CLINIC$361,203
CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$120,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$100,000
OCEN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$100,000
BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION$60,000
HOSPITALS FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$45,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HEALTH SYSTEM$40,000
THE MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM$40,000
UC HEALTHCARE SYSTEM$35,000
HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL$30,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MED CENTER$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHEAR FAMILY FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
KS
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 30 repeat orgs$329k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
12

Total granted

$16M
$284k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+55%

Still filing today

77%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEmploymentEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +105%
  • THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +62%
  • UH
    UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +148%
  • SF
    SHEAR FAMILY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +202%
  • TM
    THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +91%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
4
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
5
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
6
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
7
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
8
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the brown university health system, rih is committed to its mission: delivering health with care.

Health
9
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
10
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
11
Florida Health Sciences Center Inc

As the region's leading safety net hospital, tampa general hospital is committed to providing area residents with excellent and compassionate health care ranging from the simplest to the most complex medical services. our shared purpose:…

Health
12
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University Hospitals Health System Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shear Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
29/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION: $2,872,500 · HealthJOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATIONTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $1,537,203 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $1,390,001 · HealthUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INCMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $600,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $440,000 · Health+20 more: $1,609,500 · Health+20 moreVARIOUS GRANTS UNDER 5000 PER: $6,772,381 · OtherVARIOUS GRANTS UNDER 5000 PER+14 more: $818,000 · Other+14 moreYale University: $150,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $35,000 · PhilanthropyNicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation: $25,000 · PhilanthropySHEAR FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesTWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUE: $10,000 · Employment
Health$8,449,204Other$7,590,381Education$230,000Philanthropy$60,000Human Services$50,000Employment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION: $2,872,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $1,537,203 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $1,390,001 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $600,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $440,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM: $231,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE RELIEF OF THE RUPTURED AND CRIPPLED MAINTAINING THE: $180,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $175,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBaptist Health South Florida Inc: $160,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $150,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $144,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBaptist Health Foundation Inc: $135,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBascom Palmer Eye Institute Alumni Association Inc: $90,000 over 6y, 48% of budgetThe Christ Hospital: $78,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEAR FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCraig and Frances Lindner Center of Hope: $44,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $32,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago Medical Center: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Society IncGA16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Mayo Clinic · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Johns Hopkins University · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assn · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Healthnetwork Foundation Fka Health Net Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Healthnetwork Foundation Fka Health Net Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Yale New Haven Hospital: 0% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Healthnetwork Foundation Fka Health Net Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Healthnetwork Foundation Fka Health Net Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Healthnetwork Foundation Fka Health Net’s filings →

More from the funding graph