Skip to content
Healing Hearts Changing Minds Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Healing Hearts Changing Minds Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$155k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Health$229kEducation$129kInternational$100kYouth Development$50kSocial Science$46kHuman Services$10k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $134k
$5,150
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TAOS WHOLE COMMUNITY HEALTH$40,000
SHEFAJEWISH PSYCHEDELIC SUPPORT$25,977
HUMBOLDT CENTER FOR NEW GROWTH$21,925
HEALING TRAUMAS INTERNATIONAL INC$15,377
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF WORCESTER INC$11,220
FIRESIDE PROJECT INC$10,000
RALLY SOUND INC$10,000
INDIGENOUS PEYOTE CONSERVATION INITIATIVE$5,150
END OF LIFE PSYCHEDELIC CARE$5,000
NPA FOUNDATION$3,000
USONA INSTITUTE$2,500
LIMINA FOUNDATION$1,040
THE CAREER CATCHERS INC$1,000
WOMEN'S VISIONARY COUNCIL INC$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HEAL TRAUMAS INTERNATIONAL INC: $10k → 8%LAWRENCE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $25k → 10%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF WORCESTER INC: $11k → 11%ALMA INSTITUTE: $24k → 8%SHEFAJEWISH PSYCHEDELIC SUPPORT: $26k → 10%FIRESIDE PROJECT INC: $10k → 10%WOMEN'S VISIONARY COUNCIL INC: $1k → 12%LUNQUIST INSTITUTE: $1k → 14%HUMBOLDT CENTER FOR NEW GROWTH: $22k → 18%RECONSIDER INC: $10k → 16%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $1k → 17%THANK YOU LIFE: $48k → 10%INDIGENOUS PEYOTE CONSERVATION INITIATIVE: $5k → 27%LIMINA FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%TAOS WHOLE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $40k → 18%LIVING CANVAS FOUNDATION: $515 → 9%USONA INSTITUTE: $3k → 10%NPA FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%END OF LIFE PSYCHEDELIC CARE: $5k → 13%HEALING TRAUMAS INTERNATIONAL INC: $15k → 5%NAROPA UNIVERSITY: $48k → 12%THE CAREER CATCHERS INC: $1k → 8%LAWRENCE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $25k → 10%RALLY SOUND INC: $10k → 11%ALMA INSTITUTE: $20k → 8%ACCESS TO DOORWAYS: $65k → 10%UC BERKELEY: $82k → 10%HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT: $61k → 17%THANK YOU LIFE: $20k → 10%USONA INSTITUTE: $3k → 10%NAROPA UNIVERSITY: $40k → 12%ALMA INSTITUTE: $3k → 8%CHACRUNA INSTITUTE: $2k → 10%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA U: $40k → 17%HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT: $39k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$357k · 6 repeat orgs$362k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$357k
$210k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
0%

Still filing today

83%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $152k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +200%
  • NU
    Naropa University
    2× · 2023–2024 · $88k · revenue +22%
  • TY
    Thank You Life
    2× · 2023–2024 · $68k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • UB
    UC BERKELEY
    one grant, 2024 · $82k
  • AT
    Access to Doorways Incgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $65k · revenue +868%
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA U
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Synaptic Institute Inc

Providing care and connection to self, others, and the world at large. Our mission is to cultivate skillful, ethical, and socially responsible practitioners of entheogenic medicine rooted in holism, traditional wisdom, and science.

Health
2
Apollo Pact Inc

Advocacy Activities: Engage in advocacy efforts. Integrate former study participants from FDA clinical trials studying psychedelic compounds. Information Sharing: Collaborate with academic researchers. Identify FDA, Address the mental…

Health
3
Open Mind Collective

Our mission is to conduct research, teach, and provide direct care using psychedelic medicine and other means to heal the minds and hearts of traumatized and vulnerable individuals and communities, alleviating transgenerational suffering.

Health
4
Sana Healing Collective

We are committed to individualized, client-led approaches utilizing psychedelic-assisted therapy, including ketamine-assisted therapy, along with other integrative practices that promote the wellbeing of the whole person

Health
5
National Center for Psychedelic Education

Supported education and research training for mental health.

Education
6
American Psychedelic Practitioners Association

Safely and holistically support the integration of psychedelic medicines and practices into the us healthcare system.

—
7
Alchemy Community Therapy Center

Alchemy Community Therapy Center provides high-quality training, accesible psychedelic therapy, and innovative research, fostering effective and culturally-responsible mental health treatment for underserved communities.

Health
8
Psychotherapy Action Network
Health
9
Sierra Psychedelic Society

To build community, provide education, and promote risk management around the therapeutic potential of psychedelic medicine.

Education
10
Free Range Psychiatry Inc

Our mission is to help people holistically come off psychiatric medications by empowering them to connect to their inner wisdom and heal root causes of dis-ease.

Health
11
Zendo Project Inc

Zendo Project offers professional harm reduction education to communities and organizations, and provides peer support services at events to help transform difficult psychedelic experiences and other complex emotions into opportunities for…

Health
12
People of Color Psychedelic Collective Inc

Advancing psychedelic education

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heroic Hearts Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Npa Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Naropa University: $87,513 · OtherNaropa UniversityUC BERKELEY: $82,238 · OtherUC BERKELEYALMA INSTITUTE: $46,000 · OtherALMA INSTITUTECROSSROADS COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $40,000 · OtherCROSSROADS COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INCTRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA U: $39,969 · OtherTRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UHUMBOLDT CENTER FOR NEW GROWTH INC: $21,925 · OtherHUMBOLDT CENTER FOR NEW GROWTH INCHEALING TRAUMAS INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,377 · Other+5 more: $13,515 · OtherThank You Life: $68,200 · HealthThank You LifeAccess to Doorways Inc: $65,000 · HealthAccess to Doorways IncFireside Project Inc: $10,000 · HealthFireside Project IncHeal Traumas International Inc: $10,000 · HealthHeal Traumas Internation…+1 more: $5,000 · HealthHEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC: $99,850 · InternationalHEROIC HEARTS PR…+2 more: $2,040 · InternationalLAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHEFA JEWISH PSYCHEDELIC SUPPORT: $25,977 · ReligionSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF WORCESTER: $11,220 · ReligionINDIGENOUS PEYOTE CONSERVATION INITATIVE: $5,150 · ReligionRALLYSOUND INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureEnd of Life Psychedelic Care Inc: $5,000 · EducationNPA FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationChacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant: $2,000 · Education
Other$346,537Health$158,200International$101,890Youth Development$50,000Religion$42,347Arts & Culture$10,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC: $99,850 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetNaropa University: $87,513 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThank You Life: $68,200 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetLAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSHEFA JEWISH PSYCHEDELIC SUPPORT: $25,977 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF WORCESTER: $11,220 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHeal Traumas International Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetUSONA INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEnd of Life Psychedelic Care Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetChacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Joe & Sandy Sambe…Riverstyx FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Joe & Sandy Samberg Foundation IncNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Joe & Sandy Samberg Foundation Inc · Riverstyx Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Healing Hearts Changing Minds Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Healing Hearts Changing Minds Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Healing Hearts Changing Minds’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home