Skip to content
Hdi Equality for All Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hdi Equality for All Foundation

$356k
Granted FY2019
81
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2019 · 81 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$160
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SELF ENHANCEMENT INC$8,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$8,000
MAKE A WISH$8,000
ML FOUNDATION$8,000
ML FOUNDATION$8,000
IRCO$8,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$8,000
MAKE A WISH$8,000
LATINO NETWORK$8,000
SELF ENHANCEMENT INC$8,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$8,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$6,500
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN$6,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$6,500
KAIROS$6,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ADELANTE MUJERES: $5k → 8%LATINO NETWORK: $8k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $7k → 12%BLACK PARENT INITIATIVE: $7k → 12%BLACK PARENT INITIATIVE: $5k → 12%BLACK PARENT INITIATIVE: $5k → 12%BLACK PARENT INITIATIVE: $3k → 12%BLACK PARENT INITIATIVE: $3k → 12%BLACK PARENT INITIATIVE: $2k → 12%BETTIES360: $3k → 12%BETTIES360: $3k → 12%BETTIES360: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Campbell Institute

Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

Unclassified
2
Friends of the Children-Portland

Friends - portland commits to standing alongside our community's youth as they work to overcome barriers to their success. each child receives 1:1 support and guidance from a salaried, professional mentor (called a friend), from…

Youth Development
3
Our Children Oregon

Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…

Philanthropy
4
Kidworks Community Development Corp

Kidworks inspires purpose in youth, fuels their growth, and catalyzes their impact in the community and the world.

Human Services
5
Better Together Central Oregon

Our mission is to improve educational outcomes for children and youth from cradle to career in Central Oregon. They do this by fostering cross-sector collaboration bringing together partners from education, business, health, philanthropy,…

Human Services
6
Youth Progress Association

Youth progress is a nonprofit organization that is licensed as a child caring agency (cca) to serve youth ages 12-25 in the custody of the oregon youth authority (oya) or the oregon department of human services (dhs). youth progress uses…

Health
7
Friends of the Children - Seattle

Friends of the children - seattle has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. youth in the friends…

Youth Development
8
Neighborhood House Inc

Neighborhood house's vision is that every neighbor have the community and support they need to thrive. our programs span three pillars of excellence: safety net and community health, education, and wealth building. we serve community…

Human Services
9
Kairospdx

Kairospdx's singularly focused mission is to close the racial achievement and opportunity gaps by cultivating confident, creative, compassionate leaders exceeding academic standards at each developmental milestone from ages 0-10.

Education
10
Together We Are Greater Than

The mission of together we are greater than is to support and empower students from poverty-impacted communities to thrive in school, college and career.

—
11
Mitch Charter School

We believe that the strength of our community lies in its diversity. we know the power of many different voices at the table. these voices resound from the hearts and minds of our youth, who hold the keys to a just, fair and sustainable…

Education
12
Young Roots Oregon

The mission of young roots oregon is to creatively help young families build healthy foundations. our multi-generational vision is to give pregnant and parenting adolescents through age 24 and their children equitable opportunities for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native American Youth and Family Center; the most unlike its peers is BETTIES3SIXTY. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SELF ENHANCEMENT INC: $35,700 · OtherSELF ENHANCEMENT INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $24,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBKAIROS: $23,500 · OtherKAIROSMAKE A WISH: $22,500 · OtherMAKE A WISHIndividual grant recipient: $21,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $20,850 · OtherHACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $20,000 · OtherTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONML FOUNDATION: $16,000 · OtherML FOUNDATIONPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE: $10,200 · Other+6 more: $28,200 · Other+6 moreBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS COLUMBIA NORTHW: $29,150 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG …PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $7,950 · Youth DevelopmentPLAYWORKS EDUCATI…FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $6,500 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE CH…Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest: $5,200 · Youth DevelopmentGirls Inc of the …NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $4,750 · Youth DevelopmentNATIVE AMERICAN Y…Black Parent Initiative: $24,450 · Human ServicesBlack Parent Ini…Latino Network: $14,500 · Human ServicesLatino NetworkBETTIES3SIXTY: $8,500 · Human ServicesBETTIES3SIXTYADELANTE MUJERES: $4,750 · Human ServicesADELANTE MUJERESCOMMUNITY CYCLING CENTER: $14,600 · Recreation & SportsURBAN GLEANERS: $6,500 · Food & NutritionSMART READING: $6,500 · Education
Other$222,950Youth Development$53,550Human Services$52,200Recreation & Sports$14,600Food & Nutrition$6,500Education$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSELF ENHANCEMENT INC: $35,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBlack Parent Initiative: $24,450 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetHACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $20,850 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLatino Network: $14,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $7,950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN GLEANERS: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGirls Inc of the Pacific Northwest: $5,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetADELANTE MUJERES: $4,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $4,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBINA HEAD START INC: $3,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …OCF Joseph E Weston P…The Collins FoundationMeyer Memorial TrustMarie Lamfrom Charita…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Juan Young TrustOnpoint Community Cre…Careoregon IncMaybelle Clark Macdon…The Autzen FoundationM J Murdock Charitabl…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR24.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Juan Young Trust · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Careoregon Inc · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Autzen Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hdi Equality for All Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hdi Equality for All Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Albina Head Start Inc: 81% of income from government
  • Hacienda Community Development Corporation: 48% of income from government
  • Black Parent Initiative: 45% of income from government
  • Adelante Mujeres: 31% of income from government
  • Native American Youth and Family Center: 23% of income from government
  • Latino Network: 15% of income from government
  • Self Enhancement Inc: 14% of income from government
  • The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization: 4% of income from government
  • Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest: 4% of income from government
  • Smart Reading: 3% of income from government
  • Community Cycling Center: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hdi Equality for All Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hdi Equality for All Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hdi Equality for All’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home